영어의 습관적 현재: 적합성 이론 분석
A Relevance-theoretic Approach to Habitual Present in English
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this paper is to show that the so-called habitual present in English is basically a pragmatic phenomenon, which can appropriately be explained as following from a set of assumptions and principles of Relevance Theory. The analysis is based on the recognition that the habitual present is not a homogeneous tense phenomenon and that its non-compositional meaning is primarily the result of pragmatic processes. The study adopts the idea of the relevance-theoretic approach which proposes that a propositional content of ‘what is said’ should be constructed through pragmatic inference, showing that the indeterminacy phenomenon of habitual present can be accounted for as a result of various inferential processes that play a pivotal role in deriving explicature.
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to show that the so-called habitual present in English is basically a pragmatic phenomenon, which can appropriately be explained as following from a set of assumptions and principles of Relevance Theory. The analysis is based on the recognition that the habitual present is not a homogeneous tense phenomenon and that its non-compositional meaning is primarily the result of pragmatic processes. The study adopts the idea of the relevance-theoretic approach which proposes that a propositional content of ‘what is said’ should be constructed through pragmatic inference, showing that the indeterminacy phenomenon of habitual present can be accounted for as a result of various inferential processes that play a pivotal role in deriving explicature.
참고문헌 (27)
- 강미경, "대화 관련성 이론과 발화의 이해", 언어연구, 15, pp.5~17 (1999)
- 강미경, "관련성 원리에 입각한 대화함축과 맥락함축", 언어연구, 16, pp.5~22 (2000)
- Bach, K, "Conversatioknal Implicature", Mind and Language, 9, pp.124~162 (1994)
- Bybee, J. L., "Perspectives on Grammaticalization" (1994), John Benjamins
- Calver, E, "The Uses of the Present Tense Forms in English", Language, 22, pp.317~325 (1946)
- Carlson, G. N., "Reference to Kinds in English", Ph.D., pp.1977
- Carston, R., "Mental Representation: The Interface Between Language and Reality" (1988), Cambridge University Press
- Explicature and Semantics, "Carston, R.", UCL, 1~44, pp.UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12 (2000)
- Carston, R., "Handbook of Pragmatics" (2004), Blackwell
- Comrie, B., "Tense" (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Goldsmith, J., "The Logic of the English Progressive", Linguistic Inquiry, 13, pp.79~89 (1982)
- Grice, H. P., "Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts" (1975), Academic Press
- The Said and the Unsaid, "Horn, L. R.", Ohio State University, 163~192, pp.Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 40 (1992)
- Krifka, M., "The Generic Book" (1995), University of Chicago Press
- Kuno, S, "Gapping: A Functional Analysis", Linguistic Inquiry, 7, pp.300~318 (1976)
- Lawler, J. M., "Studies in English Generics", Ph.D., pp.1973
- Levinson, S., "Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature" (2000), MIT Press
- Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of English Language" (1985), Longman
- Recanati, F., "Pragmatics: A Reader" (1991), Oxford University Press
- Recanati, F, "What Is Said", Synthese, 128, pp.75~91 (2001)
- Rimell, L., "Habitual Sentences and Generic Quantification", Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (2004)
- Saul, J. M., "Pragmatics II: Critical Concepts in Linguistics" (2012), Routledge
- Smith, C., "The Pragmatics and Semantics of Temporal Meaning", Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society Conference (2006)
- Sperber, D., "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1986), Blackwell
- Sperber, D., "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1995), Blackwell
- Paul Grice, Saying and Meaning, "Wharton, T.", UCL, 207~248, pp.UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14 (2002)
- Wilson, D., "Handbook of Pragmatics" (2003), Blackwell