空间维度形容词“LONG/SHORT”的词汇类型学研究
An Analysis of ‘LONG/SHORT’ from the Perspective of Lexical Semantic Typology
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Drawing on the theoretical framework and methodology of the Moscow Lexical Typology Group (MLexT), this paper examines the usage of the basic meanings of the spatial dimensional adjectives “LONG/SHORT” in thirteen languages. Among the thirteen languages investigated, the basic meanings of “LONG/SHORT” in all Asian and European languages can indicate the distance between any two points in space, including “one-dimensional linear objects”, “two-dimensional flat objects” and “three-dimensional objects with outstanding features”. This reflects the cognitive commonality of different countries from different regions and cultures. The basic meanings are the same in the thirteen languages, reflecting the stability of core vocabulary. However, when “LONG/SHORT” is used to describe a “three-dimensional object with an outstanding height”, there are differences among the thirteen languages. In Asian languages, “LONG/ SHORT” cannot describe “stature” except for Mongolian and Indonesian. In Indonesian, only “SHORT” can be used to describe “stature”, while in Mongolian, both “LONG/SHORT” can be used to describe it. Except for English, almost all European languages can use “LONG/SHORT” to describe “stature”. In English, only “SHORT” can be used to describe “stature”. We have thereby demonstrated cross-linguistic semantic commonalities and verified the feasibility and applicability of the MLexT theory in lexical typology. Meanwhile, the differences between different languages in different regions and the same region also reveal the differences in the socio-cultural context of human cognition.
Abstract
Drawing on the theoretical framework and methodology of the Moscow Lexical Typology Group (MLexT), this paper examines the usage of the basic meanings of the spatial dimensional adjectives “LONG/SHORT” in thirteen languages. Among the thirteen languages investigated, the basic meanings of “LONG/SHORT” in all Asian and European languages can indicate the distance between any two points in space, including “one-dimensional linear objects”, “two-dimensional flat objects” and “three-dimensional objects with outstanding features”. This reflects the cognitive commonality of different countries from different regions and cultures. The basic meanings are the same in the thirteen languages, reflecting the stability of core vocabulary. However, when “LONG/SHORT” is used to describe a “three-dimensional object with an outstanding height”, there are differences among the thirteen languages. In Asian languages, “LONG/ SHORT” cannot describe “stature” except for Mongolian and Indonesian. In Indonesian, only “SHORT” can be used to describe “stature”, while in Mongolian, both “LONG/SHORT” can be used to describe it. Except for English, almost all European languages can use “LONG/SHORT” to describe “stature”. In English, only “SHORT” can be used to describe “stature”. We have thereby demonstrated cross-linguistic semantic commonalities and verified the feasibility and applicability of the MLexT theory in lexical typology. Meanwhile, the differences between different languages in different regions and the same region also reveal the differences in the socio-cultural context of human cognition.
참고문헌 (38)
- 任永军, "现代汉语空间维度词语义分析", 硕士, pp.2000
- 伍莹, "现代汉语空间维度形容词语义系统研究", 博士, pp.2011
- Bierwisch, M., "Dimensional adjectives: grammatical structure and conceptional interpretation" (1967), Springer
- 풍정정, "한국어 공간감각어 ‘길다", 짧다’와중국어 ‘長, Journal of korean Culture, pp.2016, 34[DOI]
- Galeote, M., "Adult performance in naming spatial dimensions of objects", The Spanish Journal of Psychology (1999)
- Greimas, A. Julien, "Sémantique structurale" (1966), Librarie Larousse
- 김진수, "한·중 공간형용사 ‘길다’와 ‘長’의 의미 대조 연구", 인문학연구, 48(2), pp.25~48 (2014), 인문과학연구소
- Lang, Ewald, "Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook. 2" (2001), Moutonde Gruyter
- Lang, Ewald, "The semantics of dimensionsal designation of spatial objects" (1989), Springer
- Lyons, J, "Semantice. (Vol.2)" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Rakhilina, E, "Kognitivnyj Analiz Predmetenyx Imën: Semantika i so etaemost" (2000), Russkie Slovari
- Rakhilina, E., "The Lexical Typology of semantic shifts" (2016), De Gruyter Mouton
- Doing lexical typology with frames and semantic maps. Basic research program working papers series:linguistics, "Rakhilina, E", WP BRP, ~, pp.WP BRP 18 (2014), LNG
- Vogel, Anna, "Swedish dimensional adjectives" (2004), Almqvist &Wiksell International
- Wienold, Gotz, "The Locus of Meaning" (1997), Kurosho
- Vandeloise, Claude, "Length, width and potential passing" (1988), Rudzka-Ostyn
- 黑龙江大学俄语系词典编辑室, "大俄汉词典" (2001), 商务印书馆
- 梁立基, "新印度尼西亚语汉语词典" (1989), 商务印书馆
- 牛津大学出版社, "新牛津英汉双解大词典" (2013), 上海外语教育出版社
- 祁广谋, "越南语汉越词词典" (2017), 商务印书馆
- 日本讲谈社, "日汉大辞典" (2002), 上海译文出版社
- 商务印书馆辞书研究中心, "罗贝尔法汉词典" (2003), 商务印书馆
- 孙义桢, "新时代西汉大词典" (2008), 商务印书馆
- 吴金瑞, "拉丁汉文辞典" (1987), 光启出版社
- 萧少云, "泰汉词典" (1990), 商务印书馆
- 新蒙汉词典编委会, "新蒙汉词典" (2002), 商务印书馆
- 叶本度, "朗氏德汉双解大词典" (2007), 外语教学与研究出版社
- 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典室, "现代汉语词典" (2016), 商务印书馆
- "국립국어원 표준국어대사전"[URL]
- "北京大学中国语言学研究中心语料库(以下简称CCL)"[URL]
- "德语语料库德国德语协会语料库(以下简称IDS)"[URL]
- "俄语国家语料库(以下简称Ruscorpora)"[URL]
- "法国国家科学研究院语料库(以下简称CNRS)"[URL]
- "韩国Naver Dictionary(以下简称NAVER)"[URL]
- "句酷双语语料库(以下简称Jukuu)"[URL]
- "利兹大学语料库(以下简称Leeds)"[URL]
- "美国当代英语语料库(以下简称COCA)"[URL]
- "泰国国家语料库"[URL]