新兴主观极量构式“A2得不像话”研究―兼论“不像话”的准程度副词化―
Research On the new Subjective Maximum Construction “A2 de bu Xiang Hua”: Also on the quasi-degree adverbalization of “bu xiang hua”
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
“A2 de(得) bu xiang hua(不像话)” is an emerging high-frequency construction in modern Chinese. It expresses that the cognitive stress subject makes a subjective maximum evaluation that a trait of a subject in line with and far beyond their own psychological expectations. Variable “A2” of the construction is mainly monosyllabic and disyllabic positive adjectives. This construction mainly as a predicate or a separate sentence is a typical declarative construction. Most constructive use cases have positive evaluation semantics. This construction is a rhetorical construction formed by the grammatical construction “V1 de(得) bu xiang hua(不像话)” through multiple interactions. At the same time, it is accompanied by the quasi-degree adverbization of “bu xiang hua(不像话)”. In addition, the article also discusses the similarities and differences between “A de(得) bu xiang hua(不像话)” and “A dao(到) bu xiang hua (不像话)”.
Abstract
“A2 de(得) bu xiang hua(不像话)” is an emerging high-frequency construction in modern Chinese. It expresses that the cognitive stress subject makes a subjective maximum evaluation that a trait of a subject in line with and far beyond their own psychological expectations. Variable “A2” of the construction is mainly monosyllabic and disyllabic positive adjectives. This construction mainly as a predicate or a separate sentence is a typical declarative construction. Most constructive use cases have positive evaluation semantics. This construction is a rhetorical construction formed by the grammatical construction “V1 de(得) bu xiang hua(不像话)” through multiple interactions. At the same time, it is accompanied by the quasi-degree adverbization of “bu xiang hua(不像话)”. In addition, the article also discusses the similarities and differences between “A de(得) bu xiang hua(不像话)” and “A dao(到) bu xiang hua (不像话)”.
참고문헌 (37)
- 陈振宇, "汉语的指称与命题" (2017), 上海人民出版社
- 杜轶, "对外汉语研究(第8期)" (2012), 对外汉语研究
- 李宇明, "汉语量范畴研究" (2000), 华中师范大学出版社
- 石毓智, "汉语语法" (2010), 商务印书馆
- 张国宪, "现代汉语形容词功能与认知研究" (2006), 商务印书馆
- 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室, "现代汉语词典" (2016), 商务印书馆
- 朱德熙, "语法讲义" (1982), 商务印书馆
- 李金凤, "“X不像话”及其主观性分析", 现代语文(语言研究版), (5) (2017)
- 刘大为, "从语法构式到修辞构式(上)", 当代修辞学, (3) (2010)
- 刘荣荣, "程度评价构式“X得不像话”研究", 绥化学院学报, (6) (2018)
- 陆俭明, "从语法构式到修辞构式再到语法构式", 当代修辞学, (1) (2016)
- 沈家煊, "概念整合与浮现意义——在复旦大学“望道论坛”报告述要", 修辞学习, (5) (2006)
- 施春宏, "“招聘”和“求职”:构式压制中双向互动的合力机制", 当代修辞学, (2) (2014)
- 施春宏, "互动构式语法的基本理念及其研究路径", 当代修辞学, (2) (2016)
- 唐贤清, "“极”作程度补语的历时发展及跨语言考察", 古汉语研究, (4) (2010)
- 唐贤清, "程度补语“煞”的历时来源及跨方言考察", 理论月刊, (2) (2011)
- 唐贤清, "“死”作程度补语的历时发展及跨语言考察", 语言研究, (3) (2011)
- 唐贤清, "程度副词作补语的跨语言考察", 民族语文, (1) (2014)
- 王长武, "表主观极量的“X到不能再X”结构", 汉语学习, (5) (2016)
- 王志英, "“不像话”的词汇化与标记化", 平顶山学院学报, (4) (2020)
- 吴福祥, "南方方言几个状态补语标记的来源(二)", 方言, (1) (2002)
- 吴福祥, "汉语能性述补结构“V得", 不C”的语法化, 2002, pp.(1), ~
- 吴为善, "“A不到哪里去”的构式解析、话语功能及其成因", 中国语文, (4) (2011)
- 徐阳春, "结构助词“得”与“的”的分合", 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版), (3) (2003)
- 姚海斌, "现代汉语程度补语“不得了”与“了不得”研究", 对外汉语研究, (2) (2020)
- 叶南, "程度副词作状语和补语的不对称性", 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), (5) (2007)
- 曾海清, "“A得不能再A”结构考察", 汉语学习, (4) (2010)
- 甄珍, "现代汉语主观极量构式“要多A有多A”研究", 汉语学习, (1) (2015)
- 张爱玲, "构式视角下“不行”向准程度副词的语法化", 语言与翻译, (1) (2021)
- 张辉, "论主观极量义构式“X得不行”", 汉语学习, (3) (2017)
- 张天雪, "“不像话”的语法化", 语文学刊, (3) (2011)
- 张秀松, "“毕竟”义“到底”句的主观化表达功能", 语文研究, (3) (2008)
- 张谊生, "程度副词充当补语的多维考察", 世界汉语教学, (2) (2000)
- 张谊生, "试论当代汉语新兴的补语标记“到”", 当代语言学, (1) (2014)
- 张谊生, "从到顶义述宾短语到极性义程度副词——以“之极、至极”和“之至、之致”为例", 语言科学, (4) (2015)
- Goldberg, Adele. E., "Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), The University of Chicago Press
- Goldberg, Adele. E., "Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language" (2006), Oxford University Press