본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

安大簡 ≪仲尼曰≫ 譯註 ―전래본 ≪論語≫에 수록된 내용을 중심으로―

Translation and Annotation of Anhui Uniersity bamboo slip Zhongni yue- Focusing on the contents included in the traditional Lunyu

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

It is estimated that the zhongniyue was compiled between 400 BC and 350 BC. Since it is similar to the date of death of Confucius and is likely to be the same as the date of survival of the Zisi(子思), there is a lot of possibility that it is an early version of the lunyu. In addition, in that phrases related to other pre-Qin literature are included, various clues about the formation process of the lunyu and the history of the edition can be secured. This paper first examined the philological characteristics of zhongniyue. First, due to the fact that Confucius was referred to as Zhongni, there is a possibility that it is the work of a school other than the traditional lunyu and Confucian school. Second, it is possible that the degree used in the zhongniyue was edited by a person with a view of the degree of thought due to the related vocabulary. With this in mind, eight phrases that can be compared with the traditional lunyu were selected and analyzed among the Confucius remarks included in the zhongniyue. The conclusions obtained through this are as follows. First, when compared from the perspective of vocabulary, the traditional lunyu is a version in which the contents of the zhongniyue are embodied. Second, in the traditional lunyu, it is possible to clearly grasp the ambiguous context in interpretation through zhongniyue. Third, compared to the traditional version, the Confucius collection compiled during the Warring States Period is an anthology without any special standards or forms. Fourth, Confucius' remarks were constantly processed by later generations until the traditional lunyu was confirmed.

Abstract

It is estimated that the zhongniyue was compiled between 400 BC and 350 BC. Since it is similar to the date of death of Confucius and is likely to be the same as the date of survival of the Zisi(子思), there is a lot of possibility that it is an early version of the lunyu. In addition, in that phrases related to other pre-Qin literature are included, various clues about the formation process of the lunyu and the history of the edition can be secured. This paper first examined the philological characteristics of zhongniyue. First, due to the fact that Confucius was referred to as Zhongni, there is a possibility that it is the work of a school other than the traditional lunyu and Confucian school. Second, it is possible that the degree used in the zhongniyue was edited by a person with a view of the degree of thought due to the related vocabulary. With this in mind, eight phrases that can be compared with the traditional lunyu were selected and analyzed among the Confucius remarks included in the zhongniyue. The conclusions obtained through this are as follows. First, when compared from the perspective of vocabulary, the traditional lunyu is a version in which the contents of the zhongniyue are embodied. Second, in the traditional lunyu, it is possible to clearly grasp the ambiguous context in interpretation through zhongniyue. Third, compared to the traditional version, the Confucius collection compiled during the Warring States Period is an anthology without any special standards or forms. Fourth, Confucius' remarks were constantly processed by later generations until the traditional lunyu was confirmed.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 郭錫良, "고대중국어" (2016), 역락
  2. 수호지진묘죽간정리소조, "수호지진묘죽간" (2010), 소명출판
  3. 요진우, "한문 문법의 분석적 이해" (2001), 계명대학교 출판부
  4. 장백잠, "儒敎經典과 經學" (2002), 경인문화사
  5. 安徽大學漢字發展與應用硏究中心, "安徽大學藏戰國竹簡(二)" (2022), 中西書局
  6. 白于藍, "戰國秦漢簡帛古書通假字彙纂" (2012), 福建人民出版社
  7. 單曉偉, "秦文字字形表" (2017), 上海古籍出版社
  8. 黃懷信, "大戴禮記彙校集注" (2005), 三秦出版社
  9. 江學旺, "西周文字字形表" (2017), 上海古籍出版社
  10. 李守奎, "包山楚墓文字全編" (2012), 上海古籍出版社
  11. 劉寶楠, "論語正義 下" (1990), 中華書局
  12. 劉釗, "古文字構形學" (2006), 福建人民出版社
  13. 上海古籍出版社, "十三經注疏 下" (1997), 上海古籍出版社
  14. 許愼, "說文解字注" (1981), 上海古籍出版社
  15. 徐在國, "戰國文字字形表" (2017), 上海古籍出版社
  16. 宗邦福, "故訓匯纂" (2003), 商務印書館
  17. 朱熹, "四書章句集注" (1983), 中華書局
  18. 이두은, "安徽大學藏戰國竹簡《仲尼曰》篇注解", 중국인문과학, (84), pp.289~315 (2023), 중국인문학회[DOI]
  19. 李家浩, "讀郭店楚墓竹簡瑣議", 中國哲學, 20 (1999)
  20. 徐在國, "安徽大學藏戰國竹簡仲尼篇初探", 文物 (2022)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)