중국어 가능 표현 能V得C에 관한 고찰
A study of Chinese possibility expression ‘Neng(能) V de(得) C’
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research focused on the fact that Neng V de C(能V得C) implies ‘possibility’, which means ‘can do~’, while it is different from Neng V C(能VC) and V de C(V得C). Here are the following results: First, when Neng V de C(能V得C) is used in declarative sentence, the adverb such as Cai(才) or Hai(还) is used together in front of it to provide conditions or hypothesis for the goal, and psychological factors such as judgment, guess, claim, and denial are following, ‘Zhiyao……jiu(只要……就)’ is used the most among them. Second, when Neng V de C(能V得C) is used with interrogative such as Zenme(怎么), Shenme(什么), Shei(谁), Nali(哪里), interrogative usually implies scolding, impossibility, strangeness, anxiety, criticism, opposition and it does not indicate location, method, or cause. Third, when Neng V de C(能V得C) is used in interrogative sentence, it usually represents the meaning of rhetoricalness or possibility. The negative meaning formation of rhetorical sentence is mostly due to doubt. The speaker uses rhetorical sentence when he/she thinks the context of the two adjacent sentence is incorrect, abnormal, or does not match. Especially the usage of rhetorical marker such as Nandao(难道), Hebi(何必), Qi(岂) is remarkably high and non-marker interrogative sentences use intonation to convey rhetorical intentions instead of specific rhetorical marker. Finally, declarative and interrogative(non-marker) sentence of Neng V de C(能V得C) have differences in duration, pitch, pitch register, and in case of interrogative sentence final syllable lengthened, intonation rised, and the shape of tone contour was found to be the same as citation tone. This research is meaningful in that it started from syntactic and semantic point of view, analyzed massive amount of corpus and studied how does Neng V de C(能V得C) actually works in real language environment, and it can be used in Chinese education field.
Abstract
This research focused on the fact that Neng V de C(能V得C) implies ‘possibility’, which means ‘can do~’, while it is different from Neng V C(能VC) and V de C(V得C). Here are the following results: First, when Neng V de C(能V得C) is used in declarative sentence, the adverb such as Cai(才) or Hai(还) is used together in front of it to provide conditions or hypothesis for the goal, and psychological factors such as judgment, guess, claim, and denial are following, ‘Zhiyao……jiu(只要……就)’ is used the most among them. Second, when Neng V de C(能V得C) is used with interrogative such as Zenme(怎么), Shenme(什么), Shei(谁), Nali(哪里), interrogative usually implies scolding, impossibility, strangeness, anxiety, criticism, opposition and it does not indicate location, method, or cause. Third, when Neng V de C(能V得C) is used in interrogative sentence, it usually represents the meaning of rhetoricalness or possibility. The negative meaning formation of rhetorical sentence is mostly due to doubt. The speaker uses rhetorical sentence when he/she thinks the context of the two adjacent sentence is incorrect, abnormal, or does not match. Especially the usage of rhetorical marker such as Nandao(难道), Hebi(何必), Qi(岂) is remarkably high and non-marker interrogative sentences use intonation to convey rhetorical intentions instead of specific rhetorical marker. Finally, declarative and interrogative(non-marker) sentence of Neng V de C(能V得C) have differences in duration, pitch, pitch register, and in case of interrogative sentence final syllable lengthened, intonation rised, and the shape of tone contour was found to be the same as citation tone. This research is meaningful in that it started from syntactic and semantic point of view, analyzed massive amount of corpus and studied how does Neng V de C(能V得C) actually works in real language environment, and it can be used in Chinese education field.
참고문헌 (26)
- 강영리, "가능 표현의 실현 용법에 대하여- ‘-을 수 있-’ 및 일본어ㆍ중국어의 대응 표현을 중심으로 -", 비교문화연구, 50, pp.313~346 (2018), 비교문화연구소[DOI]
- 민성아, ""能VC""V得C"的", 언어과학연구, (37), pp.265~281 (2006), 언어과학회
- 박성하, "현대중국어 양태조동사의 부정형식에 관한 고찰", 중국언어연구, (81), pp.97~125 (2019), 한국중국언어학회[DOI]
- 박성하, "언어유형론적인 관점에서 인식적 가능성을 표현하는 문법형태 고찰 - 중국지역 중국·티베트어의 인식양태의 가능성(possibility)을 중심으로", 중어중문학, (79), pp.163~201 (2020), 한국중어중문학회[DOI]
- 송소맹, "현대중국어 양태사의 분포와 정보구조연구", 박사, pp.2020
- 이금희, "“能", 不能VC”와 “V得, 중국어문학논집, pp.2007, (46)[DOI]
- 이미경, "중국어 의문문의 문장강세를 통한 억양변화 고찰 -‘怎麽’를 중심으로-", 중국문학, 59, pp.343~363 (2009), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
- 이미경, "중국어 성조와 한국어 방언 성조에 대한 운율유형론적 고찰", 중국문학, 78, pp.343~370 (2014), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
- 이향원, "어말 장음화의 발화 유지 기능과 화자 특성", 영주어문, 50, pp.79~103 (2022), 영주어문학회
- 陈乃凡, "用辞释例" (1954), 东方书店
- 董成如, "“什么”在反问句中的性质及相关问题", 语言研究, (3) (2017)
- 李剑影, "现代汉语能性范畴研究", 博士, pp.2007
- 刘彬, "“哪里”类反问句否定意义的形成与识解机制", 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), (1) (2019)
- 刘月华, "实用现代汉语语法" (2017), 商务印书馆
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (1994), 商务印书馆
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (2019), 商务印书馆
- 彭利貞, "現代漢語情態研究", 博士, pp.2005
- 衫村博文, "V得C、能VC、能V得C", 汉语学习, (6) (1982)
- 林焘, "汉语语法学习" (2013), 北京大学出版社
- 伊地智, "东方中国语讲座①" (1973), 东方书店
- 殷树林, "现代汉语反问句研究" (2009), 黑龙江大学出版
- 朱德熙, "语法讲义" (1982), 商务印书馆
- Hjalmarsson, A, "Measuring final lengthening for speaker-change prediction", Twelfth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (2011)
- Ogden, R., "Turn transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-ininteraction", Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31(1) (2001)
- Palmer, F. R, "Mood and Modality" (2001), New York Cambridge University Press
- Zellers, M., "Pitch and lengthening as cues to turn transition in Swedish" (2013), INTERSPEECH
