정태동사 ‘會·能·可以’의 의미분석과 사용양상 연구
A Study on the Meaning Analysis and Usage Pattern of Chinese Modal verbs ‘Hui, Neng, Keyi’
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Based on the analysis of conversational sentences in Chinese textbooks ‘New Hanyu Kouyu’, this paper points out the reasons why Chinese learners are confused with ‘會(Hui)’, ‘能(Neng)’ and ‘可以(Keyi)’. In the grammar aspect which means the meaning of ‘possibility’ and the meaning of ‘will’, ‘Hui, Neng, Keyi’ known as ‘Auxiliary Verb’ are not very different from each other. but they are different from each other in the ‘Modality’ aspect. Modal verb ‘能(Neng)’ includes ‘Epistemic Modality’, ‘Deontic Modality’ and ‘Dynamic Modality’ all. But modal verb ‘會(Hui)’ doesn’t include ‘Deontic Modality’ and modal verb ‘可以(Keyi)’ doesn’t include ‘Epistemic Modality’. In the ‘Modality’ aspect the main meaning of ‘能(Neng)’ is ‘possibility’ of ‘Dynamic Modality’, the main meaning of ‘會(Hui)’ is ‘conjecture’ of ‘Epistemic Modality’ and the main meaning of ‘可以(Keyi)’ is ‘permission’ of ‘Deontic Modality’. The main reason why learners can’t distinguish clearly in the modal verbs ‘會(Hui)’, ‘能(Neng)’ and ‘可以(Keyi)’ is that in Chinese conversation sentences have similar meaning and usage. Therefore each commonality and difference of the modal verbs ‘會(Hui)’, ‘能(Neng)’ and ‘可以(Keyi)’ will be clearly recognized only when explain in terms of ‘Modality’ which reveal the speaker's subjectivization.
Abstract
Based on the analysis of conversational sentences in Chinese textbooks ‘New Hanyu Kouyu’, this paper points out the reasons why Chinese learners are confused with ‘會(Hui)’, ‘能(Neng)’ and ‘可以(Keyi)’. In the grammar aspect which means the meaning of ‘possibility’ and the meaning of ‘will’, ‘Hui, Neng, Keyi’ known as ‘Auxiliary Verb’ are not very different from each other. but they are different from each other in the ‘Modality’ aspect. Modal verb ‘能(Neng)’ includes ‘Epistemic Modality’, ‘Deontic Modality’ and ‘Dynamic Modality’ all. But modal verb ‘會(Hui)’ doesn’t include ‘Deontic Modality’ and modal verb ‘可以(Keyi)’ doesn’t include ‘Epistemic Modality’. In the ‘Modality’ aspect the main meaning of ‘能(Neng)’ is ‘possibility’ of ‘Dynamic Modality’, the main meaning of ‘會(Hui)’ is ‘conjecture’ of ‘Epistemic Modality’ and the main meaning of ‘可以(Keyi)’ is ‘permission’ of ‘Deontic Modality’. The main reason why learners can’t distinguish clearly in the modal verbs ‘會(Hui)’, ‘能(Neng)’ and ‘可以(Keyi)’ is that in Chinese conversation sentences have similar meaning and usage. Therefore each commonality and difference of the modal verbs ‘會(Hui)’, ‘能(Neng)’ and ‘可以(Keyi)’ will be clearly recognized only when explain in terms of ‘Modality’ which reveal the speaker's subjectivization.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김혜경, "현대중국어 ‘가능’ 양상사(Modal) 분석 -문법화의 관점에서-", 중국어교육과 연구, (16), pp.245~268 (2012), 한국중국어교육학회
- 모해연, "포커스 중국어 문법과 작문" (2016), 차이나하우스
- 박건희, "능원동사 ‘能’과 ‘會’의 오류분석 및 교수방안", 중국학논총, (44), pp.23~44 (2014), 한국중국문화학회
- 박성하, "현대중국어에서 ‘가능성(possibility)’을 나타내는 양태조동사의 오류분석 및 교학 방안 연구", 중국언어연구, (70), pp.101~133 (2017), 한국중국언어학회[DOI]
- 박재승, "조동사‘能’과 ‘可以’의 기능 비교 연구 - 양태범주를 중심으로", 중국연구, 55, pp.47~65 (2012), 중국연구소[DOI]
- 吳勇毅, "實用漢語語法" (2018), YBM
- 윤상희, "정태동사 ‘要·得·應該’의 의미·화용적 교육방법", 외국학연구, (55), pp.127~152 (2021), 외국학연구소[DOI]
- 李寶貴, "北京大學중국어 어법의 모든 것" (2016), 동양북스
- 사위국, "중국어 능원동사와 가능보어의 가능표현 비교 연구", 언어학연구, 18(2), pp.45~68 (2013), 한국언어연구학회
- 임유경, "중국어 문법·작문 업그레이드" (2003), 동양북스
- Zheng Zhenmei, "조동사 ‘能’과 ‘會’의 의미비교 연구 ― 副詞의 의미 제한을 중심으로", 중국어문학논집, (81), pp.179~197 (2013), 중국어문학연구회
- 주취란, "'能(可以)' 與可能補語可能義用法之比較與敎學", 비교문화연구, 11(2), pp.127~148 (2007), 비교문화연구소[DOI]
- 최재영, "중국어 조동사 연구 (1) - 현대중국어 조동사의 특징, 범위, 하위분류를 중심으로 -", 중국연구, 43, pp.277~299 (2008), 중국연구소[DOI]
- 최재영, "상고중국어시기∼근대중국어시기의 금지 표지 연구 -‘不可, 不得, 不能, 不许’를 중심으로", 중어중문학, (67), pp.199~237 (2017), 한국중어중문학회
- 최재영, "중고중국어시기 동적양상(능력류) 조동사의 부정형식 고찰- ‘不能, 不可(以), 不得’를 중심으로", 중어중문학, (75), pp.115~151 (2019), 한국중어중문학회[DOI]
- Palmer, F.R., "Modality and the English Modals" (1979), Longman
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- 鄧小菲, "“能” “會” “可以” 比較研究", 碩士, pp.2006
- 李亞娟, "“能”、“會”和“可以”的認知研究及偏誤分析", 碩士, pp.2009
- 李穎, "漢語助動詞“能”與“會”的語義比較", 中國學 (2015)
- 李元元, "能願動詞“會”、“能”和“可以”的偏誤分析及教學建議", 碩士, pp.2014
- 慕海瓏, "對韓初級漢語教學中的能願動詞“能” “會” “可以”研究", 碩士, pp.2012
- 彭利貞, "現代漢語情態硏究" (2007), 中國社會科學出版社
- 吳曉陽, "能願動詞“能” “會” “可以”的研究", 碩士, pp.2017
- 楊曉健, "能願動詞“能”“會”“可以”交叉義項習得情況考察", 碩士, pp.2014
- 張淩波, "“能、會、可以” 的偏誤分析及其教學策略", 碩士, pp.2016