유토피아적 사유의 현재성에 관한 고찰
On the Presentness of Utopian Thought
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The defective reality in which we live has been a hotbed of various utopian thoughts. But recently, man seems to feel very tired of the utopian imaginations on ideal community. The most important reason for this is to be found in the collective trauma and impotent feeling which the two representative totalitarian utopianisms of the 20th century, Nazism and Marxism packed into the memory of mankind. But I wrote this essay based on the citical mind that the disqualification of the two criminal utopianisms does not need to result in the disqualification of utopia in general. We could never escape our present bad and unjust reality without endeavoring to make the better and more just community. It is because mankind raised the reflectively filtered new hope that it could overcome the despair and fear which Gulag and Holocaust left. Then, we should learn, not the impotence which surrenders to fear, but how to hope in the rational and responsible way, from the failed utopian experiments of the 20th century. Today, progress became something possible but non-necessary like retrogression because we do not believe in the linear progress of human history anymore. It is the very essential openness of human history that again discloses the utopian dimension of our thinking and restores the significance of responsible historic choices. In this point, utopia will be still living in our thinking as the ‘reflected present’ which normatively leads our ever-changing present.
Abstract
The defective reality in which we live has been a hotbed of various utopian thoughts. But recently, man seems to feel very tired of the utopian imaginations on ideal community. The most important reason for this is to be found in the collective trauma and impotent feeling which the two representative totalitarian utopianisms of the 20th century, Nazism and Marxism packed into the memory of mankind. But I wrote this essay based on the citical mind that the disqualification of the two criminal utopianisms does not need to result in the disqualification of utopia in general. We could never escape our present bad and unjust reality without endeavoring to make the better and more just community. It is because mankind raised the reflectively filtered new hope that it could overcome the despair and fear which Gulag and Holocaust left. Then, we should learn, not the impotence which surrenders to fear, but how to hope in the rational and responsible way, from the failed utopian experiments of the 20th century. Today, progress became something possible but non-necessary like retrogression because we do not believe in the linear progress of human history anymore. It is the very essential openness of human history that again discloses the utopian dimension of our thinking and restores the significance of responsible historic choices. In this point, utopia will be still living in our thinking as the ‘reflected present’ which normatively leads our ever-changing present.
참고문헌 (35)
- 김종국, "칸트에서 유토피아와 진보", 철학, (105), pp.1~19 (2010), 한국철학회
- 러셀 자코비, "유토피아의 종말" (2000), 모색
- 박홍규, "유토피아 이야기" (2010), 텍스트
- 벤 뒤프레, "위대한 정치: 보편적 합의를 위한, 출혈 없는 전쟁" (2012), 지식갤러리
- 빌헬름 포센쿨, "윤리학사전", pp.319~320 (1998), 예경
- 손철성, "유토피아, 희망의 원리: 현대 사회에서 유토피아론의 재구성을 위한 철학적 탐구" (2003), 철학과현실사
- 손철성, "허버트 마르쿠제: 마르크스와 프로이트를 결합시키다" (2007), 살림
- 알랭 핀킬크라우트, "잃어버린 인간성: 20세기에 관한 에세이" (1997), 당대
- 앙드레 고르, "프롤레타리아여 안녕" (2011), 생각의나무
- 앙리 르페브르, "현대세계의 일상성" (2005), 기파랑
- 올더스 헉슬리, "멋진 신세계" (1998), 문예출판사
- 욜렌 딜라스-로세리, "미래의 기억 유토피아" (2007), 서해문집
- 월터 카우프만, "인문학의 미래: 왜 인문학을 가르치고 배워야 하는가?" (2011), 동녘
- 위르겐 하버마스, "새로운 불투명성" (1995), 문예출판사
- 이매뉴얼 월러스틴, "유토피스틱스 또는 21세기의 역사적 선택들" (1999), 창작과비평사
- 조관성, "칸트의 교육학 강의 (역주)- 서론에 관한 철학적 주석을 담은 증보판 -." (2007), 철학과 현실사
- 임마누엘 칸트, "영구 평화론: 하나의 철학적 기획" (2008), 서광사
- 임홍빈, "기술문명과 철학" (1995), 문예출판사
- 제임스 힐턴, "잃어버린 지평선" (2010), 문예출판사
- 조지 오웰, "1984년" (1999), 문예출판사
- 김만권, "만민법" (2009), 아카넷
- 존 커크 보이드, "왜 분노하지 않는가: 2048, 공존을 위한 21세기 인권운동" (2011), 중앙북스
- 주강현, "유토피아의 탄생" (2012), 돌베게
- 지그문트 바우만, "새로운 빈곤: 노동, 소비주의 그리고 뉴푸어" (2010), 천지인
- 테오도르 아도르노, "부정변증법" (1999), 한길사
- 테오도어 아도르노, "프리즘: 문화비평과 사회" (2004), 문학동네
- 토머스 모어, "유토피아" (2011), 문예출판사
- 김종기, "다시 읽는 칸트의 영구평화론" (2007), 백산서당
- Engels, Friedrich, "Marx-Engels Werke 19", pp.177~228 (1987), Dietz Verlag
- Hegel, G. W. F., "Hegel Werke 7" (1986), Suhrkamp Verlag
- Jonas, Hans, "Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation" (1979), Insel Verlag
- Jonas, Hans, "Materie, Geist und Schöpfung: Kosmologischer Befund und kosmogonische Vermutung" (1988), Suhrkamp Verlag
- Mannheim, Karl, "Ideologie und Utopie" (1985), Vittorio Klostermann
- Marx, Karl, "Marx-Engels Werke 3", pp.9~530 (1983), Dietz Verlag
- Marx, Karl, "Marx-Engels Werke 25" (1987), Dietz Verlag