공동체 글쓰기 연구 - sns 글쓰기를 중심으로
A Study on Community Writing -Focusing on SNS writing
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Community writing would advance communication with others in a broad sense. To find the link, the self constantly explores and conflicts with others. Although reconciliation seems impossible, the ultimate purpose of the conflicts is the reconciliation. Recovering ‘us’ by testifying others and proving myself makes levels of sympathy strong. The misconception about sharing is derived from a monistic concept of space. In order for writers to be free from restrictions of time, space and sense, they should realize that they are paradoxically with someone. We should be immersed in a task of looking for a source of literate sensitivity, which becomes a base of professional and practical writing, writing activities of aspiring writers who orient pure literature and writing activities of every human being. Manifestation of desire to write should not be a far away matter limited to professional writers or talented writers. That way, literature would be loved by people as a public art and it would contribute to developing their potential. Community writing aims for what community feels, in other words, it aims for the value of sympathy. Each individual is already a community, and realizing the fact that fate of community is linked to the individual is the beginning of community writing. After all, literate sensitivity is manifested, grows and continues with the help of community. By examining and identifying ‘community’, this study prospects the future of community writing. First, this study presumes the self and others are communal existence. Second, this study establishes act of the self and others as the will of communal communication. Third, this study examines communication on SNS writing. In addition, this study establishes the communal concept, corrects the instrumental thought which mainly considers usefulness important, and identifies the literate possibility of writing community.
Abstract
Community writing would advance communication with others in a broad sense. To find the link, the self constantly explores and conflicts with others. Although reconciliation seems impossible, the ultimate purpose of the conflicts is the reconciliation. Recovering ‘us’ by testifying others and proving myself makes levels of sympathy strong. The misconception about sharing is derived from a monistic concept of space. In order for writers to be free from restrictions of time, space and sense, they should realize that they are paradoxically with someone. We should be immersed in a task of looking for a source of literate sensitivity, which becomes a base of professional and practical writing, writing activities of aspiring writers who orient pure literature and writing activities of every human being. Manifestation of desire to write should not be a far away matter limited to professional writers or talented writers. That way, literature would be loved by people as a public art and it would contribute to developing their potential. Community writing aims for what community feels, in other words, it aims for the value of sympathy. Each individual is already a community, and realizing the fact that fate of community is linked to the individual is the beginning of community writing. After all, literate sensitivity is manifested, grows and continues with the help of community. By examining and identifying ‘community’, this study prospects the future of community writing. First, this study presumes the self and others are communal existence. Second, this study establishes act of the self and others as the will of communal communication. Third, this study examines communication on SNS writing. In addition, this study establishes the communal concept, corrects the instrumental thought which mainly considers usefulness important, and identifies the literate possibility of writing community.
참고문헌 (15)
- 김성호, "‘새로운 온라인 공론장’에서의 비전문가의 미술비평- 자발적 비평과 말하기로서의 글쓰기", 미학예술학연구, 39, pp.185~214 (2013), 한국미학예술학회
- 김수이, "공동체, 나눔, 글쓰기 2 - 공동체의 ‘나눔’의 양상과 ‘글쓰기공동체’를 중심으로", 한국문예창작, 13(2), pp.255~285 (2014), 한국문예창작학회
- 고봉준, "근대문학과 공동체, 그 이후 - ‘외부성의 공동체’를 위한 시론", 상허학보, 33, pp.33~69 (2011), 상허학회
- 권혁웅, "시와 공동체", 상허학보, 33(150), pp.13~32 (2011), 상허학회
- 문정애, "어떤 공동체도 이루지 못한 자들의 공동체, 모리스 블랑쇼", 장-뤽낭시, 『밝힐 수 없는 공동체, 오늘의 문예비평, pp.2006[DOI]
- 박준상, "『무위(無爲)의 공동체』의 몇몇 개념들에 대하여", 철학과 현상학 연구, (46), pp.61~86 (2010), 한국현상학회
- 박준상, "이름 없는 공동체:레비나스와 블랑쇼에 대해", 철학과 현상학 연구, (18), pp.3~141 (2002), 한국현상학회
- 박준상, "정치적 ‘행위’와 공동체 —장-뤽 낭시를 중심으로—", 철학논총, 78(4), pp.347~363 (2014), 새한철학회
- 손민달, "현대시에 나타난 ‘공동체’ 연구 - 1990년대 시를 중심으로 -", 어문학, (118), pp.305~333 (2012), 한국어문학회
- 임철규, "눈의 역사 눈의 미학" (2006), 한길사
- 장현미, "SNS에서 글쓰기가 공감경험과 친사회행동에 미치는 효과:페이스북 이용자를 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 58(3), pp.5~35 (2014), 한국언론학회
- 정재찬, "상호텍스트성에 기반한 문학교육의 실천", 독서연구, (21), pp.111~160 (2009), 한국독서학회
- Rifkin, J, "공감의 시대" (2010), 민음사
- 진태원, "마르크스의 유령들" (2007), 이제이북스
- 한나 아렌트, "인간의 조건" (1996), 한길사
