노계(蘆溪) 박인로(朴仁老) 가사(歌辭) 연구(硏究) -전쟁가사인 <태평사>와 <선상탄>을 중심으로
A Study on Nogye Park In-Ro’s Gasa
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper tries to understand how Nogye‘s experience during wartime is embodied in his works. Among his works, this paper would focus on <Taepyeongsa> and <Seonsangtan>, two Gasas that use war as major subject. Nogye‘s life both involves life of a soldier and Confucian scholar, and this fact differentiates his life from lives of other writers or Confucian scholars. Nogye, as a soldier who actually participated in war, wrote <Seonsangtan> and <Taepyeongsa>, which were based on his real experience. His intention of creating those two works is written in collection of his works, and we would carefully examine his motive of creation and his intention based on this record. Using this as grounds, we would define his intention of creation. Basically, Nogye tried his best to keep the basic principles of Confucian scholar and to demonstrate those principles himself throughout his life, and he did so. This is a core element in understanding his works. The fact that his works include lots of 전고 made his works to be underestimated up until now. However, it was because he was ‘Seongaja’. He was not only a good singer, but he was also talented in writing lyrics. Therefore, it was natural for him to use expressions of 전고 in parts of his works which bears conventional aspects in them. And this is also related with Nogye’s works that were done in form of ‘Daejak’(works that he worte instead) and ‘Myeonjak’(works that he wrote by order). Nogye clearly stated his intention of creation for each works, not like other writers of Chosun dynasty. This can be seen as his intention of clearly showing that he had wrote works according to orders of others or as a ghostwriter of others. Thus, works that are done in form of ‘Daejak’(works that he worte instead) or ‘Myeonjak’(works that he wrote by order) had to be written in appropriate level of expressions and contents of the nobility. As shown in <Taepyeongsa> or <Seonsangtan>, reality of war and will of writer is specifically embodied in works. <Taepyeongsa> consoles and cheers up soldiers for the victory of war and represents sentiment of group that longs for peace. <Seonsangtan> embodies sentiment of resentment and lament about the war through Nogye’s voice. Nogye is also a Confucian scholar who strived to live his life keeping basic principles of scholar.
Abstract
This paper tries to understand how Nogye‘s experience during wartime is embodied in his works. Among his works, this paper would focus on <Taepyeongsa> and <Seonsangtan>, two Gasas that use war as major subject. Nogye‘s life both involves life of a soldier and Confucian scholar, and this fact differentiates his life from lives of other writers or Confucian scholars. Nogye, as a soldier who actually participated in war, wrote <Seonsangtan> and <Taepyeongsa>, which were based on his real experience. His intention of creating those two works is written in collection of his works, and we would carefully examine his motive of creation and his intention based on this record. Using this as grounds, we would define his intention of creation. Basically, Nogye tried his best to keep the basic principles of Confucian scholar and to demonstrate those principles himself throughout his life, and he did so. This is a core element in understanding his works. The fact that his works include lots of 전고 made his works to be underestimated up until now. However, it was because he was ‘Seongaja’. He was not only a good singer, but he was also talented in writing lyrics. Therefore, it was natural for him to use expressions of 전고 in parts of his works which bears conventional aspects in them. And this is also related with Nogye’s works that were done in form of ‘Daejak’(works that he worte instead) and ‘Myeonjak’(works that he wrote by order). Nogye clearly stated his intention of creation for each works, not like other writers of Chosun dynasty. This can be seen as his intention of clearly showing that he had wrote works according to orders of others or as a ghostwriter of others. Thus, works that are done in form of ‘Daejak’(works that he worte instead) or ‘Myeonjak’(works that he wrote by order) had to be written in appropriate level of expressions and contents of the nobility. As shown in <Taepyeongsa> or <Seonsangtan>, reality of war and will of writer is specifically embodied in works. <Taepyeongsa> consoles and cheers up soldiers for the victory of war and represents sentiment of group that longs for peace. <Seonsangtan> embodies sentiment of resentment and lament about the war through Nogye’s voice. Nogye is also a Confucian scholar who strived to live his life keeping basic principles of scholar.
참고문헌 (22)
- 김문기, "譯註 蘆溪集" (1999), 역락
- 李殷相, "鷺山文選" (1947), 永昌書館
- 李相寶, "蘆溪詩歌硏究" (1980), 이우출판사
- 정재호, "한국가사문학론" (1986), 집문당
- 元容文, "蘆溪 朴仁老論", 어문론집, (35) (1996), 민족어문학회
- 서인석, "한국고전문학작가론" (1998), 소명출판
- 崔雄, "韓國古典詩論으로 본 蘆溪詩歌", 冠嶽語文硏究, 2 (1977)
- 成範重, "蘆溪文學의 展開樣相과 그 意味", 국어국문학, (94) (1985), 국어국문학회
- 禹應順, "朴仁老의 ‘安貧樂道’ 意識과 自然", 한국학보, 41 (1985), 일지사
- 具壽榮, "蘆溪 朴仁老의 詩歌硏究", 석사, pp.1987
- 崔相殷, "노계가사의 작품구조와 현실인식", 반교어문연구, 1 (1988), 반교어문연구회
- 崔顯載, "蘆溪 朴仁老의 善歌者으로서의 面貌와 그 意義", 우리말, 25 (2002), 우리말글학회
- 최상은, "蘆溪歌辭의 창작기반과 문학적 지향", 한국시가연구, 11 (2002), 한국시가학회
- 오선주, "蘆溪의 ‘代作", 命作’ 속 개별 의식 試考-「立巖二十九曲」을 중심으로-, 2013, pp.(87), 175~199[DOI]
- 朴晟義, "松江·蘆溪·孤山의 詩歌文學" (1966), 玄岩社
- 崔雄, "한국고전시가작품론 2, 白影 鄭炳昱 先 生 10週忌追慕論文集刊行委員會" (1992), 集文堂
- 고순희, "임란 이후 17세기 우국가사의 전개와 성격", 한국고전연구, 2 (1996), 한국고전연구회
- 김용철, "<태평사>의 내용 구성과 미적 형식", 한국문학논총, 29 (2001), 한국문학회
- 이승남, "노계가사에 나타난 戰爭과 江湖의 형상화 방식", 한국어문학연구, 41 (2003), 한국어문학연구학회
- 김정석, "17세기 전반에 나타난 현실과 그 인식", 국학연구, 7 (2005), 한국국학진흥회
- 이금희, "임진전쟁기의 참상과 문학적 형상화 - <용사음>과 <태평사> 비교 -", 국학연구론총, (12), pp.1~30 (2013), 택민국학연구원
- 황병익, "壬亂期 부산지역 戰亂歌辭의 의미 고찰", 港都釜山, (26) (2010), 부산광역시 시사 편찬위원회
