‘생성 인공지능(Generative-AI) 시대’의 시작과 청소년 현장의 과제
The Beginning of the Age of Generative-AI and the Challenges of Youth Fields
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 연구는 챗GPT(ChatGPT)의 등장으로 시작된 생성 인공지능 시대에 대해 청소년 현장의 과제를 찾기 위한 것이다. 2022년 말에 등장한 ChatGPT는 본격적인 생성 인공지능 시대를 열었다. 이것은 기존의 인공지능 기술을 넘어서 삶의 다양한 영역에서 큰 변화를 가져왔다. 그러나 이러한 발전에 따른 사회적 쟁점이 동시에 늘어나고 있으며, 사회적 대비가 미비한 상황에 직면하고 있다. 이 글은 특히 청소년 현장에서 이러한 사회적 쟁점과 관련된 과제를 탐구하고, 적절한 대응 방안을 찾기 위한 방향성을 제시하고자 한다.
Abstract
AI is no longer a distant story or an imaginary of the future, but has already entered the larger realm of our lives. At a completely different stage, a new stage, a situation that requires a social response. In the absence of defined areas of limited and unclear technical standards, legal frameworks, and social values, the development of artificial intelligence is proceeding very rapidly. There is a need for regulation on copyright, concerns about new types of social problems and crimes, including the protection of personal information, and the need for reform of laws and institutions and active policy responses. In particular, since the popularization of AI has begun in the absence of social standards or legal and institutional mechanisms related to artificial intelligence, it is necessary to discuss and prepare to respond to new changes in all areas, and it is necessary to respond and prepare the youth scene with regard to the youth who will be at the center of this change more than anyone else. The era of generative AI or ChatGPT can be a new challenge for young people. Youth can get more information faster and easily create the results they want. In other words, young people will be exposed to new information due to advances in AI technology, and they will have more choices while also having the capacity to take responsibility for those choices. In addition, the development of artificial intelligence technology is causing new types of crimes, and the privacy and privacy of young people may be threatened. Accordingly, it is necessary to respond to changes in technology related to the emergence of generative AI in the youth field, and all stakeholders related to artificial intelligence should work together to derive educational tasks such as values, systems, and norms, including accurate recognition of artificial social agents who have appeared in front of the public. With this background and necessity, the purpose of this article is to find out about the challenges that the youth scene should prepare for in the era of generative AI-ChatGPT, which has already arrived.
참고문헌 (37)
- Ahmed Tlili, "What if the devil is my guardian angel:ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education", Smart Learning Environments, 10(1) (2023)
- "Commercial applications of GPT-3that are already live" (2023)[URL]
- Bock, D. E., "Artificial intelligence: disrupting what we know about services", Journal of Services Marketing, 34(3), pp.317~334 (2020)
- Bouschery, S., "Augmenting Human Innovation Teams with Artificial Intelligence:Exploring Transformer-Based Language Models" (2023)[DOI]
- Brachten, F., "The acceptance of chatbots in an enterprise context – A survey study", International Journal of Information Management, 60, pp.102375~ (2021)
- "Don’t fear ChatGPT: education will always trump technology" (2023)[URL]
- Dwivedi, Yogesh K, "“So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy", International Journal of Information Management, 71 (2023)
- Alexander Richer, "ChatGPT as a member of hybrid teams", 7~9
- Ilias O. Pappas, "ChatGPT for human augmentation", 9~10
- Ramarkrishnan Raman, "CharGPT and education-is a symbiotic relationship possible?", 25~26
- Tom Crick, "ChatGPT and education policy and practice", 30~32
- "Why is ChatGPT Making Waves in the AI Market?" (2022)[URL]
- "Ethics guildlines for trustworthy AI" (2019)[URL]
- Floride, L, "Distributed morality in an information Society", Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, pp.727~743 (2013)
- "ChatGPT: Everything you need to know about OpenAI’s GPT-3 tool" (2023)[URL]
- Lim, W. M., "Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators", International Journal of Management Education, 21(2) (2023)
- Miao, "인공지능과 교육 : 정책 입안자를 위한 지침" (2021), 유네스코
- Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0), "National Institute of Standards and Technology(NIST)", U.S.Department of Commerce, ~, pp.NIST AI 100-1 (2023)
- GPT-4 Technical Report, "OpenAI", OpenAI, ~ (2023)
- Perkins, Mike, "Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era:ChatGPT and beyond", Journal of University Teaching &Learning Practice, 20(2), pp.1~24 (2023)
- Stahl, Bernd Carsten, "Exploring ethics and human rights in artificial intelligence – A Delphi study", Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 191 (2023)
- T. M. Holtgraves, "Perceiving artificial social agents", Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), pp.2163~2174 (2007), ACM Digital Library
- Tingting Zhang, "The contributions of AI in the development of ideological and political perspectives in education", Heliyon RESEARCH ARTICLE, 9(3) (2023), Heliyon
- Wang, Fei-Yue, "What Does ChatGPT Say: The DAO from Algorithmic Intelligence to Linguistic Intelligence", IEEE, 2023, ~
- Zhou, JieAff, "ChatGPT:potential, prospects, and limitations", Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, pp.1~6 (2023)
- 교육부, "초·중등학교 교육과정 총론(교육부 고시 제2022-2호 일부개정 포함)", 교육부, ~ (2022)
- "디지털 리터러시란?", 디지털리터러시교육협회[URL]
- 목광수, "인공지능 시대의 인간: 윤리적 관점을 중심으로", 제51회 콜로키움 자료 (2022), 국가생명윤리정책원
- 컴퓨터·정보 소양 함양 방안 탐색, "박상욱", 한국교육과정평가원, ~ (2018)
- 포스트 코로나 시대의디지털 리터러시 함양방안, "정재원", 한국교육개발원, ~, pp.한국교육개발원 연구보고서(RR2021-13) (2021)
- 제임스 배럿, "파이널 인벤션" (2016), 동아시아
- 최숙영, "AI 리터러시 프레임워크에 대한 연구", 컴퓨터교육학회 논문지, 25(5), pp.73~84 (2022), 한국컴퓨터교육학회[DOI]
- 교육과정 연계 디지털 리터러시 교육 가이드라인 개발 연구, "한국교육학술정보원(KERIS)", 한국교육학술정보원, ~ (2022)
- AI 보안 법·제도·정책 현황 및 전망, "한국인터넷진흥원", 한국인터넷진흥원(KISA), ~ (2021)
- 홍석한, "유네스코 ‘인공지능 윤리에 관한 권고’에 대한 법적 고찰", 법학연구, 30(2), pp.313~343 (2022), 법학연구소[DOI]