고전(古傳)적 예술작품의 인문학적 교육 가능성 - <Mulan>의 리텔링(re-telling)을 중심으로 -

Abstract

This article examined a possibility of a humanistic education through classic re-telling. For this, as it has introduced a real case of re-telling on classical <Mulan> and examined how personal agony and conflict between a classic as art and a classic as a symbol of reality has been accepted to modern society, founding the educational effect and implication. In the 1st chapter, this paper considered a humanistic education at the statement of a liberal education in a university of Korea, in the 2nd chapter, it examined what the representation of a classic as culture and art was. In the 3rd chapter, it studied the course of analyzing <Mulan> and the finding of modern meaning in a classic with a real case. In the 4th chapter, it identified the needs for re-telling through a humanistic question at the viewpoint of understanding other’s suffering and communication. In the 5th chapter, as a conclusion, it drew a possibility of a humanistic education. Like such, it is possible to do a humanistic question through classic re-telling, and the course for finding the answer of it is the way to open a possibility of a humanistic education. Therefore, an essay on art as a cultural artistic symbol that was discussed in the II is possible if a classic is to be as a classic, and art is to be for holding up clarity of art. This is the same context as the reason why this paper tries to suggest the needs for re-telling of a classic. The re-telling of a classic is to find ontological agony of a realistic human being who is buried under a classic, if it was lost; it may be a way to find an answer for a humanistic question. This study expects that such course of re-telling would be helped lead a humanistic question.