본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘신선 되기’와 ‘신선 찾기’의 현실 담론적 성격 - <남궁선생전>과 <김신선전>의 비교 연구 -

‘Becoming Sinseon' and ‘Searching Sinseon' as a Realistic Discourse - Comparative Study on <Namgungseonsaengjeon> and <Kimsinseonjeon> -

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

<Namgungseonsaengjeon>(The rest is marked in <Namgung>) is composed of internal story narrated by the first person and external story narrated by the third person. Internal story is about Namgungdoo's 'succeeding in life' and 'becoming sinseon'. External story is the background about that the first-person narrator met Mr. Namgung, and the first-person narrator's comment about Mr. Namgung. <Kimsinseonjeon>(The rest is marked in <Kim>) is composed two parts. In the first half, the first-person narrator narrates the messages that he heard from neighbors about Mr. Kim. In the second half, the first-person narrator narrates his direct search about Mr. Kim. So, <Kim> is a narrative about the narrator's 'searching sinseon'. In the two texts, not only ‘succeeding in life' but also ‘becoming sinseon' and ‘searching sinseon' connote realistic discourse. In <Namgung>, Mr. Namgung's ‘succeeding in life' and ‘becoming sinseon' are the trace of his desire and it's failure. Mr. Namgung's failure of ‘succeeding in life' connotes the meaning extraordinary character's frustration, and his failure was caused by disobeying Confucian ethics. The failure of ‘becoming sinseon' connotes the meaning that human's natural desire is acknowledged. In <Kim>, narrator's ‘searching sinseon' was failed. The failure of ‘searching sinseon' connotes the meaning that the sinseon who is taoist hermit with miraculous powers is not exist. Just, sinseon is the man who live in obscurity all through his life. <Namgung>'s narrator can be considered Heo gyun and <Kim>'s narrator Bak Ji-ueon too. When <Namgung>'s narrator and character met each other, narrator, namely the writer longed for sinseon's world, but character, namely Mr. Nam felt doubts about sinseon's life. So, narrator and character were in disagreement. This feature reflects the writer's mental anguish. <Kim>'s narrator and character missed each other. Narrator, namely Mr. Bak was getting the blues at that time. Narrator knew that Mr. Kim had nothing remedy of Taoism, but he wanted to meet him, because he felt sympathy with Mr. Kim about social dissatisfaction. The readers of <Kim> must catch the meaning of hidden side. <Namgung> and <Kim> have relation with the context of Joseon society and literary history. With growing empirical and rational thinking and consciousness, writers created sinseon tale based on reality. So, sinseon tales also have realistic meanings. Especially, two texts have great value in protecting touches of humanity.

Abstract

<Namgungseonsaengjeon>(The rest is marked in <Namgung>) is composed of internal story narrated by the first person and external story narrated by the third person. Internal story is about Namgungdoo's 'succeeding in life' and 'becoming sinseon'. External story is the background about that the first-person narrator met Mr. Namgung, and the first-person narrator's comment about Mr. Namgung. <Kimsinseonjeon>(The rest is marked in <Kim>) is composed two parts. In the first half, the first-person narrator narrates the messages that he heard from neighbors about Mr. Kim. In the second half, the first-person narrator narrates his direct search about Mr. Kim. So, <Kim> is a narrative about the narrator's 'searching sinseon'. In the two texts, not only ‘succeeding in life' but also ‘becoming sinseon' and ‘searching sinseon' connote realistic discourse. In <Namgung>, Mr. Namgung's ‘succeeding in life' and ‘becoming sinseon' are the trace of his desire and it's failure. Mr. Namgung's failure of ‘succeeding in life' connotes the meaning extraordinary character's frustration, and his failure was caused by disobeying Confucian ethics. The failure of ‘becoming sinseon' connotes the meaning that human's natural desire is acknowledged. In <Kim>, narrator's ‘searching sinseon' was failed. The failure of ‘searching sinseon' connotes the meaning that the sinseon who is taoist hermit with miraculous powers is not exist. Just, sinseon is the man who live in obscurity all through his life. <Namgung>'s narrator can be considered Heo gyun and <Kim>'s narrator Bak Ji-ueon too. When <Namgung>'s narrator and character met each other, narrator, namely the writer longed for sinseon's world, but character, namely Mr. Nam felt doubts about sinseon's life. So, narrator and character were in disagreement. This feature reflects the writer's mental anguish. <Kim>'s narrator and character missed each other. Narrator, namely Mr. Bak was getting the blues at that time. Narrator knew that Mr. Kim had nothing remedy of Taoism, but he wanted to meet him, because he felt sympathy with Mr. Kim about social dissatisfaction. The readers of <Kim> must catch the meaning of hidden side. <Namgung> and <Kim> have relation with the context of Joseon society and literary history. With growing empirical and rational thinking and consciousness, writers created sinseon tale based on reality. So, sinseon tales also have realistic meanings. Especially, two texts have great value in protecting touches of humanity.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 강동엽, "허균의 전에 대한 고구", 한국한문학연구, 2, pp.53~68 (1977)
  2. 권진숙, "연암의 김신선전 연구", 경기어문학, 1, pp.188~216 (1980), 경기어문학회
  3. 김영, "「중세 권위주의에 저항한 문인, 교산 허균」, 민족문학사연구소 고전문학분과, 『한국고전문학작가론』", pp.316~334 (1998), 소명출판
  4. 김명호, "신선전에 대하여, in 한국 판소리·고전문학 연구", pp.657~669 (1983), 아세아문화사
  5. 김명호, "「북학을 주창한 근대 리얼리즘의 선구자, 연암 박지원」, 민족문학사연구소 고전문학분과, 『한국고전문학작가론』", pp.389~409 (1998), 소명출판
  6. 김천혜, "소설 구조의 이론" (1990), 문학과지성사
  7. 김현룡, "교산의 남궁선생전 연구", 국문학논집, 5, pp.113~125 (1972), 단국대학교국어국문학과
  8. 김홍식, "김신선전 연구", 전농어문연구, 7, pp.127~144 (1995), 서울시립대학교 문리과대학 국어국문학과
  9. 두창구, "교산의 신선계 전 연구", 비평문학, 13, pp.179~195 (1999), 한국비평문학회
  10. 문범두, "허균의 신선전 연구", 국어국문학연구, 22, pp.113~140 (1994), 영남대 국어국문학과
  11. 문범두, "남궁선생전의 기술태도와 작가의식", 영남어문학, 27, pp.121~145 (1995)
  12. 문영오, "연암소설에서의 도교사상 연구 : 특히 노장철학을 중심으로", 동대논총, 19, pp.9~30 (1989), 동덕여자대학
  13. 문영오, "김신선전에서의 도교사상 요소 고구", 동대논총, 20, pp.83~102 (1990)
  14. 박기석, "<김신선전> 연구", 고전문학과 교육, 7(7), pp.139~158 (2004), 한국고전문학교육학회
  15. 박수밀, "朴趾源의 老莊思想 수용과 神仙觀", 도교문화연구, (22), pp.34~62 (2005), 한국도교문화학회
  16. 박영희, "조선후기 전에 나타난 신선관", 이화어문논집, 11, pp.305~326 (1990), 이화어문학회
  17. 박혜숙, "소설의 등장인물" (2004), 연세대 출판부
  18. 박희병, "조선후기 전의 소설적 성향 연구", 박사, pp.1991
  19. 박희병, "이인설화와 신선전, in 한국고전인물전연구", pp.187~275 (1992), 한길사
  20. 박희병, "나의 아버지 박지원" (2005), 돌배게
  21. 소재영, "허균의 생애와 문학, in 허균의 문학과 혁신사상" (1981), 새문사
  22. 신태수, "남궁선생전 연구", 석사, pp.1987
  23. 이강옥, "조선중기의 도선적 경향과 허균의 문학", 관악어문연구, 4, pp.277~305 (1979), 서울대 국어국문학과
  24. 이경우, "문헌 소재 전 양식의 변모양상, in 한국 판소리·고전문학 연구", pp.612~627 (1983), 아세아문화사
  25. 이신성, "「≪감호집≫ 소재 신선전에 대하여", 고소설연구, 6 (1998), 한국고소설학회
  26. 이영지, "남궁선생전의 서사적 성격", 경상어문, 13, pp.303~328 (2007), 경상대학교 국어국문학과 경상어문학회
  27. 이재수, "한국소설연구" (1969), 선명문화사
  28. 이재인, "허균 전의 탈이데올로기 지향성 연구", 논문집, 49, pp.1~25 (2005), 경기대학교 교무처
  29. 이정진, "전의 서술양식과 소설로의 변용 연구", 박사, pp.1993
  30. 전상경, "남궁선생전의 형성과 작품 구조", 문학과언어, 14, pp.215~233 (1993), 문학과언어연구회
  31. 조동일, "허균, in 한국문학사상사시론", pp.169~187 (1978), 지식산업사
  32. 조성환, "교산 허균의 문학과 사상 : 성소부부고를 중심으로", 인문학논총, 6(1), pp.293~315 (2006), 한국인문과학회
  33. 차충환, "남궁선생전의 서사적 성격", 고황논집, 17, pp.33~49 (1996), 경희대학교대학원
  34. 차충환, "남궁선생전의 의미구조와 작가의식", 인문학연구, 5, pp.197~219 (2001), 경희대학교 인문학연구원
  35. 최삼룡, "남궁선생전에 나타난 도선사상 연구", 한국언어문학, 16, pp.159~182 (1978), 한국언어문학회
  36. 최준하, "다산 정약용의 조신선전 비교고찰", 어문연구, 25, pp.317~331 (1994), 어문연구학회
  37. 최준하, "조선조 신선전에 대한 분석 및 비교고찰", 한국언어문학, 46, pp.161~185 (2001), 한국언어문학회
  38. 최창록, "신선전과 신선소설 장르의 설정", 인문예술논총, 31, pp.67~86 (1982), 대구대학교 인문과학예술문화연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)