초등학교 국어과 성취수준별 학생의 학력 특성 연구 : 2010-2011년 초6 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과를 바탕으로
What Do 6th Grade Students(at Varying Academic Achievement Levels)know about Korean? - A Study Based on the Results of 2010～2011 National Assessment of Educational Achievement in Korean -
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to analyse what standards 6th graders in different academic achievement levels(AAL)achieve in Korean and to find out the hierarchy of the difficulty of the standards among students. Based on the result of NAEA test, we categorize students' academic achievement level into 4 bands; Advanced, Proficient, Basic, Below Basic. We analysed the results of 2010 & 2011 NAEA Korean which are based on the same standards within the test framework. This framework follows the 2007 National Curriculum. Our analysis was conducted in the following procedures; 1) We detected test items students in AAL responded correctly more than 74% for multiple-choice items(MCI) & 65% for open-ended items (OEI) and to check those items in 2 years consecutively. Each item is developed using the same standards of test framework, therefore students in AAL showed proficient achievement in those items with more than 74% (or 65%) correct answer in 2 consecutive years. 2) We also reviewed "discriminating items(DI)" among those 2-year- achieved-items for more in-depth analysis. DI are items with "the property that a large percentage of students at an achievement level can respond correctly to the item whereas at the lower levels cannot" (Beaton et al., 2012:11). 3) Finally we checked correct answer rates of students in one level below for those 2-year-achieved-items in order to understand which item was difficult(or easy) to the students in one level below. Followed these procedures we found that 4 standards were achieved by Basic, 6 by Proficient, 4 by Advanced in 2 years consecutively. We checked these 4, 6, 4 items's correct answer rate of students in one level below as well. Therefore we could determine the degree of standards' difficulty to students. Based on these analysed results, we suggested the possible hierarchy of standards in the national curriculum and useful pieces of advice for teaching students in each academic level.
Abstract
This study aims to analyse what standards 6th graders in different academic achievement levels(AAL)achieve in Korean and to find out the hierarchy of the difficulty of the standards among students. Based on the result of NAEA test, we categorize students' academic achievement level into 4 bands; Advanced, Proficient, Basic, Below Basic. We analysed the results of 2010 & 2011 NAEA Korean which are based on the same standards within the test framework. This framework follows the 2007 National Curriculum. Our analysis was conducted in the following procedures; 1) We detected test items students in AAL responded correctly more than 74% for multiple-choice items(MCI) & 65% for open-ended items (OEI) and to check those items in 2 years consecutively. Each item is developed using the same standards of test framework, therefore students in AAL showed proficient achievement in those items with more than 74% (or 65%) correct answer in 2 consecutive years. 2) We also reviewed "discriminating items(DI)" among those 2-year- achieved-items for more in-depth analysis. DI are items with "the property that a large percentage of students at an achievement level can respond correctly to the item whereas at the lower levels cannot" (Beaton et al., 2012:11). 3) Finally we checked correct answer rates of students in one level below for those 2-year-achieved-items in order to understand which item was difficult(or easy) to the students in one level below. Followed these procedures we found that 4 standards were achieved by Basic, 6 by Proficient, 4 by Advanced in 2 years consecutively. We checked these 4, 6, 4 items's correct answer rate of students in one level below as well. Therefore we could determine the degree of standards' difficulty to students. Based on these analysed results, we suggested the possible hierarchy of standards in the national curriculum and useful pieces of advice for teaching students in each academic level.
참고문헌 (27)
- 2010년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과 분석-국어-, "김도남", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2011-3-2 (2011)
- 년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과 분석 -국어-, "김도남", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2012-2-2 (2012)
- 김영란, "국어과 국가수준 학업성취도 평가의 문항 개선 방안 연구 －2008∼2010년 검사지의 타당도 검토를 중심으로－", 국어교육학연구, (44), pp.67~110 (2012), 국어교육학회
- 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 개선 연구 - 점수체제 개선과 결과 활용 방안, "김성숙", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2009-6 (2009)
- 김수천, "국민의 교육받을 권리와 기초학력 책임지도제", 교육과정연구, 23(4), pp.157~174 (2005), 한국교육과정학회
- 국어과 학업성취도 평가 결과에 나타난 초, 중, 고 학생의 성취수준별 학력 특성”에 대한 토론, In 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과에 기반한 교과별 학력 특성, "김희경", 69~71, pp.연구자료 ORM 2012-91 (2012)
- 남민우, "PISA와 NAEA에서 나타난 우리나라 학생들의 국어 능력 특성 연구", 새국어교육, 89(89), pp.155~186 (2012), 한국국어교육학회
- 2008년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구 -국어, "남민우", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2009-9-1 (2009)
- 2007년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구-국어, "남민우", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2008-5-1 (2008)
- 2009년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구-국어, "남민우", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2010-6-2 (2010)
- 2006 년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구 -국어, "남민우", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2007-3-2 (2007)
- 박선미, "우리나라 학생들의 학교급별 도해력 발달 수준 분석 -2005~2007년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가를 중심으로-", 대한지리학회지, 44(3), pp.410~427 (2009), 대한지리학회
- 박영목, "독서교육론" (2008), 박이정
- 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 -기술보고서, "박정", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRO 2006-4 (2006)
- 송현정, "대학수학능력시험 언어 영역 난이도 관련 변인에 대한 연구", 국어교육, (113), pp.233~262 (2004), 한국어교육학회
- 2004년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구-국어, "이재기", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2005-1-2 (2005)
- 2005년국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구-국어, "이재기", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2006-1-1 (2006)
- 2003년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구-국어, "이재기", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2004-1-2 (2004)
- 장보람, "학습일지에 나타난 초등학생의 국어과 학습 양상", 석사, 초등국어교육전공, pp.2012
- 2003년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구-총론, "정구향", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2004-1-1 (2004)
- 국가수준 학업성취도 평가의 교과별 평가 틀 개발 연구, "정은영", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 CRE 2010-7 (2010)
- Beaton, Albert E, "Alternative approaches to setting performance standards for the National Assessment of Educational Progress(NAEP)" (2012), American Institutes for Research
- Garner, R, "Monitoring passage inconsistency among poor comprehender: A preliminary test of the piecemeal processing explanation", Journal of Educational Research, 74(3), pp.159~162 (1984)
- Monitoring of understanding among seventh graders: An investigation of good comprehender-poor comprehender differences in knowing and regulating reading behavior, Unpublished manuscript, "Garner, R", University of Maryland, ~ (1980)
- Graves, M. F, "Teaching reading in the 21st century" (2007), Pearson
- Huynh, H, "Some Technical Aspects of Standard Setting", Paper presented at Joint Conference on Standard Setting for Large-Scale Assessment (1994)
- Markham, E. M, "Realizing that you don't undersand : Elementary school childern's awareness of inconsistencies", Child Development, 50, pp.643~655 (1979)