18세기 경상도 단성현 법물야면의 혼인 양상
A Study on the Marriage Aspect of Beopmulya - myeon, Danseong - hyeon, Gyeongsang - do in the 18th Century
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The local relationship of marriage had an important meaning in the pre-modern society. At that time, marriage was not performed through free love but it was arranged marriage via hawk. The fact strengthened the political, intentional characteristic of marriage. The figure is shown well in the marriage relationship of the high class. The high class preferred the long-distance marriage to maintain social position of family and reinforce solidarity between classes through marriage. In the record of family register, it was general that the marriage of the high class was inter-hyeon marriage. However, it is not impossible to know whether the border of marriage was province or hyeon. When considering the fact that there was no powerful surname, who was in high public post, in Danseong area, it is assumed that the family looked for marriage partners in adjacent guns or hyeons such as Hapcheon and Samga. The clan village, which has been formed since the 18th century, became the main factor for the high class to look for marriage partner in the remote place. Therefore, the powerful noble class showed the figure of 'hierarchical marriage' with the woman of same descent family. It was the unavoidable method as the number of marriage partners decreased. The case of the middle or low class was different from that of the high class. The classes concentrated on the marriage within village (ri (village) unit) to reinforce the local solidarity. It was found that in inner-hyeon marriage, the marriage within village of the middle class shared more than 70%. They tried to maintain and reinforce their social solidarity and search for convenience of life through overlapped marriage on the basis of small local society unit. It is assumed that it showed the type of mutual cooperation for agriculture labor. The marriage of the middle or low class was not intentional or political when compared to that of the high class. Usually, the class tried to supplement weak decent family and reinforce mutual solidarity through the marriage in near place. Unlike the high class that has formed clan village, the class could find the marriage partner more easily in near place. The class was gakseongbati that had weak local foundation so it was easy for the class to find marriage partner in near place. The marriage of this class did not concentrated on paternal line. 'Local marriage' that without the classification of father's or mother's relative, the woman of decent family left to near place was relatively active. The narrow marriage network means the reduction of human relation or activity. After all, it caused the result to firm the relation between the high and the low. Because of the reason, the scope of marriage worked as the standard to classify the high and the low.
Abstract
The local relationship of marriage had an important meaning in the pre-modern society. At that time, marriage was not performed through free love but it was arranged marriage via hawk. The fact strengthened the political, intentional characteristic of marriage. The figure is shown well in the marriage relationship of the high class. The high class preferred the long-distance marriage to maintain social position of family and reinforce solidarity between classes through marriage. In the record of family register, it was general that the marriage of the high class was inter-hyeon marriage. However, it is not impossible to know whether the border of marriage was province or hyeon. When considering the fact that there was no powerful surname, who was in high public post, in Danseong area, it is assumed that the family looked for marriage partners in adjacent guns or hyeons such as Hapcheon and Samga. The clan village, which has been formed since the 18th century, became the main factor for the high class to look for marriage partner in the remote place. Therefore, the powerful noble class showed the figure of 'hierarchical marriage' with the woman of same descent family. It was the unavoidable method as the number of marriage partners decreased. The case of the middle or low class was different from that of the high class. The classes concentrated on the marriage within village (ri (village) unit) to reinforce the local solidarity. It was found that in inner-hyeon marriage, the marriage within village of the middle class shared more than 70%. They tried to maintain and reinforce their social solidarity and search for convenience of life through overlapped marriage on the basis of small local society unit. It is assumed that it showed the type of mutual cooperation for agriculture labor. The marriage of the middle or low class was not intentional or political when compared to that of the high class. Usually, the class tried to supplement weak decent family and reinforce mutual solidarity through the marriage in near place. Unlike the high class that has formed clan village, the class could find the marriage partner more easily in near place. The class was gakseongbati that had weak local foundation so it was easy for the class to find marriage partner in near place. The marriage of this class did not concentrated on paternal line. 'Local marriage' that without the classification of father's or mother's relative, the woman of decent family left to near place was relatively active. The narrow marriage network means the reduction of human relation or activity. After all, it caused the result to firm the relation between the high and the low. Because of the reason, the scope of marriage worked as the standard to classify the high and the low.
참고문헌 (20)
- 권기중, "조선 후기 향리층의 혼인 네트워크—『경상도단성현호적대장』을 중심으로—", 韓國史學報, (33), pp.313~335 (2008), 고려사학회
- 권내현, "조선후기 동성촌락 구성원의 통혼 양상단성현 신등면 안동권씨 사례", 한국사연구, (132), pp.109~136 (2006), 한국사연구회
- 권오정, "19세기 제주도 촌락의 촌락내혼율과 촌락 내 혼인관계 연구-제주 대정현 사계라 호적중초를 중심으로-", 제주도연구, 23 (2003)
- 권태억, "조선왕조시대 인구추정에 관한 일시론", 동아문화, 14 (1977)
- 김건태, "18세기 초혼과 재혼의 사회사- 단성호적을 중심으로 -", 역사와 현실, (51), pp.195~223 (2004), 한국역사연구회
- 김건태, "19세기 단성지역의 결혼관행", 古文書硏究, 28, pp.235~263 (2006), 한국고문서학회
- 김경란, "조선후기『단성현호적대장』의 여성파악실태 연구", 박사, pp.2003
- 김준형, "조선 후기 단성현 법물면 지역 촌락의 변화. in: 한국사론 32" (2001)
- 김택규, "씨족부락의 구조연구" (1979), 일조각
- 여중철, "한국 농촌의 지역적 통혼권. in: 신라가야문화 9.10" (1978)
- 李成妊, "19세기 제주 大靜縣 邑治 거주민의 혼인양상―大靜縣衙中日記와 ‘東城里戶籍中草’를 중심으로", 대동문화연구, 1(57), pp.7~29 (2007), 대동문화연구원
- 이성임, "조선 후기 동성촌락 구성원의 혼인관계 —단성현 법물야면 商山金氏 사례를 중심으로—", 韓國史學報, (32), pp.245~266 (2008), 고려사학회
- 정승모, "통혼권과 지역사회체계연구", 한국문화인류학, 15 (1983)
- 정지영, "조선후기 과부의 수절과 혼인", 고문서연구, 18 (2000)
- 정지영, "조선후기 여성호주 연구", 박사, pp.2000
- 정진영, "18~19세기 호적대장 ‘호구’기록의 검토", 大東文化硏究, 39 (2001)
- 조강희, "영남지방의 혼반연구-진성이씨 퇴계파 종손을 중심으로 한 추적조사-", 민족문화논총, 6 (1984)
- 조강희, "전통사회의 혼인에서 지연의 문제", 민족문화논총, 16 (1996)
- 한영국, "조선 왕조 호적의 기초적 연구", 한국사학, 6 (1985)
- 善生永助, "朝鮮の聚落" (1935), 朝鮮總督府
