본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한용운 시가에 나타난 선(禪) 표현의 국면과 미학

A Study on the Seon(禪) Expression and Aesthetic of HanYongUn’s Siga(詩歌)

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This paper is written in order to research for the Seon(禪) expression and aesthetic of HanYongUn’s Siga(詩歌). HanYongUn is very famous as Seon master and independent campaigner, modern poet in Korea. He wrote many kinds of literary works, for example, many modern poetry, modern novels, Sijo, Chino-Korean Poetry etc. It’s very exceptional that he wrote a lot of Korean traditional Sijo and Chino-Korean Poetry. Because he was a modern poet as same as modern novelist. He was practicing Seon meditation throughout his life. So he naturally expressed Seon in his Chino-Korean Poetry and his Korean traditional Sijo, even in his modern poetry. That’s why the Seon(禪) expression and aesthetic of HanYongUn’s Siga(詩歌) should be studied. So studying on his Seon(禪) expression and aesthetic of HanYongUn’s Siga(詩歌) can help someone to understand the essence of HanYongUn’s all literature. There were found the fact that the expression type of HanYongUn’s Seon are different according to literature genres: his Chino-Korean Poetry, his Korean traditional Sijo, his modern poetry. Firstly, HanYongUn expressed Seon(禪) by using objects as one of various daily lifes in his Chino-Korean Poetry. His various daily life was mainly described in his Chino-Korean Poetry. His daily life is connected with the time and space situation, meeting or parting people situation, composing poetry situation, watching object situation, thinking and acting by himself situation etc. When his expressing Seon in his Chino-Korean Poetry, he adapted the rhetoric of paradox and symbolistic. Secondly, when his expressing Seon in Korean traditional Sijo, his purpose was teaching people: monk, lay people. He wanted to correct the way of routine teaching and to break down the dualism by expressing Seon in his Sijo. When his expressing Seon in his Korean traditional Sijo, he adapted the rhetoric of command and conclusively speaking, irony. Thirdly, when his expressing Seon in modern poetry, he built his lover which means principle and nation as well as lover. In the process of describing the relationship between himself and lover, he expressed Seon in modern poetry. The relationship between himself and lover was circulative. Because they are sometimes being united, other times being separated in circulation. In order to express these circulations he adapted the rhetoric of paradox and symbolistic in his modern poetry. Even though I studied the Seon(禪) expression and aesthetic of HanYong Un’s Siga(詩歌) in three aspects But there could be the other things to study about these kinds of theme. I might continue researching the other kinds of theme next time in the near future.

Abstract

This paper is written in order to research for the Seon(禪) expression and aesthetic of HanYongUn’s Siga(詩歌). HanYongUn is very famous as Seon master and independent campaigner, modern poet in Korea. He wrote many kinds of literary works, for example, many modern poetry, modern novels, Sijo, Chino-Korean Poetry etc. It’s very exceptional that he wrote a lot of Korean traditional Sijo and Chino-Korean Poetry. Because he was a modern poet as same as modern novelist. He was practicing Seon meditation throughout his life. So he naturally expressed Seon in his Chino-Korean Poetry and his Korean traditional Sijo, even in his modern poetry. That’s why the Seon(禪) expression and aesthetic of HanYongUn’s Siga(詩歌) should be studied. So studying on his Seon(禪) expression and aesthetic of HanYongUn’s Siga(詩歌) can help someone to understand the essence of HanYongUn’s all literature. There were found the fact that the expression type of HanYongUn’s Seon are different according to literature genres: his Chino-Korean Poetry, his Korean traditional Sijo, his modern poetry. Firstly, HanYongUn expressed Seon(禪) by using objects as one of various daily lifes in his Chino-Korean Poetry. His various daily life was mainly described in his Chino-Korean Poetry. His daily life is connected with the time and space situation, meeting or parting people situation, composing poetry situation, watching object situation, thinking and acting by himself situation etc. When his expressing Seon in his Chino-Korean Poetry, he adapted the rhetoric of paradox and symbolistic. Secondly, when his expressing Seon in Korean traditional Sijo, his purpose was teaching people: monk, lay people. He wanted to correct the way of routine teaching and to break down the dualism by expressing Seon in his Sijo. When his expressing Seon in his Korean traditional Sijo, he adapted the rhetoric of command and conclusively speaking, irony. Thirdly, when his expressing Seon in modern poetry, he built his lover which means principle and nation as well as lover. In the process of describing the relationship between himself and lover, he expressed Seon in modern poetry. The relationship between himself and lover was circulative. Because they are sometimes being united, other times being separated in circulation. In order to express these circulations he adapted the rhetoric of paradox and symbolistic in his modern poetry. Even though I studied the Seon(禪) expression and aesthetic of HanYong Un’s Siga(詩歌) in three aspects But there could be the other things to study about these kinds of theme. I might continue researching the other kinds of theme next time in the near future.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 나옹, "나옹록" (2001), 장경각
  2. 유창식, "진본청구영언" (1957), 신생문화사
  3. 김흥규, "고시조대전" (2012), 고려대민족문화연구원
  4. 임선묵, "근대시조대전" (1981), 홍성사
  5. 한용운, "님의 沈默" (1926), 滙東書館
  6. 한용운, "한용운시전집" (1989), 문학사상사
  7. 한용운, "한용운전집 1-6" (1973), 신구문화사
  8. 한용운, "한용운 시전집" (2006), 장수
  9. 김광원, "만해 한용운의 선시", 유심, 19, pp.30~54 (2004), 만해사상실천선양회
  10. 김대춘, "卍海 韓龍雲의 漢詩硏究", 東岳漢文學論集, 10, pp.499~573 (2001), 東國大學校 한문학회
  11. 김용직, "만해 한용운 문학, 형이상(形而上)시의 위상과 원천", 만해학연구, pp.7~27 (2008), 만해사상실천선양회
  12. 김재홍, "한용운문학연구" (1982), 일지사
  13. 김종균, "한용운의 한시와 시조", 어문연구, (21), pp.103~122 (1979), 일조각
  14. 김종균, "萬海 韓龍雲의 時調", 국어국문학, (83), pp.55~74 (1980), 국어국문학회
  15. 남정희, "한용운 시의 역설과 그 의미 - 유식학과 금강경을 중심으로-", 국제어문, (53), pp.75~106 (2011), 국제어문학회
  16. 유문선, "北韓에서의 萬海 韓龍雲 문학 연구", 어문연구(語文硏究), 34(2), pp.183~208 (2006), 한국어문교육연구회
  17. 문덕수, "한용운연구", pp.3~14 (1999), 새문사
  18. 박진환, "만해 한용운 ; 역설의 미학으로 보는 님의 시학", 東洋文學, (창간), pp.262~282 (1988), 동양문학사
  19. 서준섭, "한용운의 禪과『님의 침묵』- 만해 시의 재해석을 위한 시론", 萬海學報, 4, pp.81~105 (2002), 만해사상실천선양회
  20. 신규탁, "『십현담주해(十玄談註解)』에 나타난 만해 한용운 선사의 선사상", 禪文化硏究, (16), pp.7~42 (2014), 한국불교선리연구원
  21. 심재기, "萬海 韓龍雲의 文體推移", 冠岳語文硏究, 3, pp.267~276 (1978), 서울大學校 國語國文學科
  22. 이종건, "만해 한용운의 시조와 한시", 시조학논총, (23), pp.133~160 (2005), 한국시조학회
  23. 이태희, "六堂과 萬海 時調의 語調", 시조학논총, (24), pp.9~9 (2006), 한국시조학회
  24. 전재강, "시조문학의 이념과 풍류", pp.312~336, 보고사
  25. 전재강, "나옹 선시에 나타난 시공 표현의 용어 유형", 우리말글, 57, pp.283~313 (2013), 우리말글학회
  26. 전재강, "나옹 선시에 나타난 체언 계열 어휘의 양면성", 어문학, (121), pp.215~244 (2013), 한국어문학회
  27. 전재강, "나옹 선시에 나타난 용언 계열 어휘의 양면성", 한국시가연구, 35, pp.33~66 (2013), 한국시가학회
  28. 전재강, "나옹시 하위 유형의 작품 세계와 선적 표현", 국어교육연구, (54), pp.459~494 (2014), 국어교육학회(since1969)
  29. 전재강, "경허 선시의 표현 원리", 우리말글, 60, pp.157~190 (2014), 우리말글학회
  30. 전재강, "경허시에 나타난 인식과 서정의 거리", 어문학, (124), pp.197~230 (2014), 한국어문학회
  31. 전재강, "태고 보우와 석옥 청공 선시의 비교 연구", 우리말글, 62, pp.217~242 (2014), 우리말글학회
  32. 전재강, "한용운 시조의 내면 세계와 표현 미학", 시조학논총, (43), pp.177~206 (2015), 한국시조학회
  33. 전재강, "한용운 한시에 나타난 일상성과 그 확산적 관계망", 국어국문학, (172), pp.239~267 (2015), 국어국문학회
  34. 전국선원수좌회 편찬추진위원회, "간화선", pp.62~70 (2015), 조계종출판사
  35. 한춘섭, "萬海 韓龍雲의 文學 : 時調詩를 中心으로", 시조문학, (52), pp.95~114 (1979), 시조문학사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)