문학장의 진실과 광기의 문학적 의미 - 「소문의 벽」 다시 읽기 -
A Truth of Literary Field and Literary Meaning of Madness : Going back to Reading Wall of Rumour
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The paper aims to put the spotlight the meaning of the self-statement in Lee Chung Jun's Wall of Rumour. The writer try to discuss the research subject into two layers. One is self-statement and the other is one out of the literary field. The established study on it has suggested that the self- statement in the novel is focused on the character Park Jun's inner-trauma and hidden power that disturbs the self-statement. But the argument can’t explain the problematic nature. Meanwhile, the writer examines the problem to the politics in the literary subjects of its field not only the problem of personal self-statement. the literary field itself is the one for judgement, selection, and removal of the literature in other-ness to prove the literary appropriateness each literary subjects. Park Jun’s self-statement can be achieved with the new meaning when selection and exclusion of the literary subjects are regarded as intervened aspect. In special, the writer discussed the continual failure of Park Jun’s self-statement with the connection of the inner-structure in the literary field and could interpreted the bound author’s universal fate in the modern system. Secondly, the writer focused on the problem of the origin and the desire in Park Jun’s self-statement through he performed the madman’s act. He was not so accepted as a subject of the self-statement in literary field that he played madman out of the literary field. But this performance was not simple dissemblance. His performance was the self-statement shown with the body out of the literary field. last but not least, the writer considered the Dr. Kim’s treatment as the external literary field that the origin and desire were explicated in Park Jun’s self-statement.
Abstract
The paper aims to put the spotlight the meaning of the self-statement in Lee Chung Jun's Wall of Rumour. The writer try to discuss the research subject into two layers. One is self-statement and the other is one out of the literary field. The established study on it has suggested that the self- statement in the novel is focused on the character Park Jun's inner-trauma and hidden power that disturbs the self-statement. But the argument can’t explain the problematic nature. Meanwhile, the writer examines the problem to the politics in the literary subjects of its field not only the problem of personal self-statement. the literary field itself is the one for judgement, selection, and removal of the literature in other-ness to prove the literary appropriateness each literary subjects. Park Jun’s self-statement can be achieved with the new meaning when selection and exclusion of the literary subjects are regarded as intervened aspect. In special, the writer discussed the continual failure of Park Jun’s self-statement with the connection of the inner-structure in the literary field and could interpreted the bound author’s universal fate in the modern system. Secondly, the writer focused on the problem of the origin and the desire in Park Jun’s self-statement through he performed the madman’s act. He was not so accepted as a subject of the self-statement in literary field that he played madman out of the literary field. But this performance was not simple dissemblance. His performance was the self-statement shown with the body out of the literary field. last but not least, the writer considered the Dr. Kim’s treatment as the external literary field that the origin and desire were explicated in Park Jun’s self-statement.
참고문헌 (14)
- "소문의 벽" (1998), 열림원
- 권오룡, "이청준 깊이 읽기" (1999), 문학과지성사
- 김윤식, "한국소설사" (1993), 예하
- 김치수, "이청준론" (1991), 삼인행
- 이재선, "현대소설의 서사주제학" (2007), 문학과지성사
- 미셸 푸코, "광기의 역사" (2003), 나남출판
- 피에르 부르디, "예술의 규칙" (1999), 동문선
- 김태환, "자율성 개념과 문학사회학", 문학과사회, 14, pp.1069~ (2001), 문학과지성사
- 나소정, "이청준 소설의 공포증 모티프 연구", 한국문예비평연구, (23), pp.255~278 (2007), 한국현대문예비평학회
- 우찬제, "약전으로 읽는 문학사2", pp.443~444 (2008), 소명출판
- 이광호, "이청준 소설에 나타난 시선과 광기의 정치학 : 중편 「소문의 벽」을 중심으로", 인문학연구, (43), pp.205~226 (2012), 인문학연구원
- 이선영, "‘탈권력’을 위한 권력적 글쓰기 -이청준의 「소문의 벽」 연구-", 국어국문학, (162), pp.383~411 (2012), 국어국문학회[DOI]
- 최재선, "이청준의 『소문의 벽』 연구", 문명연지, (24), pp.25~ (2009)
- 황경, "이청준 소설에 나타난 예술적 주체의 죽음과 소설론의 상관성 연구", 현대문학이론연구, (53), pp.363~383 (2013), 현대문학이론학회
