김수영의 시에서 ‘형식’의 의미와 지향 - 시어의 특성과 반복 기능을 중심으로 -
The Meaning of ‘Format’ and Oriented in the Poem Sooyoung Kim - Focused on Properties of Poetic Words and Function of Repetition -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines works by Kim Soo-young from the perspective of “form” and studies the orientation of form and its relationship with “content.” By doing so, this paper intends to prove that for Kim Soo-young, “form” means “ethical form.” Form has two different meanings to Kim Soo-young. First, form is “place of langue” where detailed aspects of life and problems are described. Thus, the poet tried to reveal and reproduce life by choosing and adopting specific nouns that were widely used in a daily life. Second, form is operation of language with which individual beings show differences. His choice and development of unique nouns which can be called “vacuum language” is a way to maximize mobility of language. In addition, repetition is a method that clearly demonstrates the poet’s concept of form. Through repetition, he showed various differences and acquired aesthetic novelty. Here, repetition does not mean repeating the same meaning of signifiers but exploring the potential of predicates by eradicating central and fixed meaning in sentences. That is, by repetition, the fixed meaning of a subject or a common noun was weakened while differences of exsistents and temporary phases were vividly expressed by predicates. Likewise, repetition is a formative way to narrate the real meaning and value of existents. In this regard, his poets have a ethical form that horizontally depicts the value of all existents. Kim Soo-young strived to figure out how “form” itself can include and reveal “content.” His poets display “content” through form. It is in line with his theory of poetry, so-called theory of the whole body and above all, his works are precious examples of “practices of literature,” which resisted to totalitarianism and standardization.
Abstract
This paper examines works by Kim Soo-young from the perspective of “form” and studies the orientation of form and its relationship with “content.” By doing so, this paper intends to prove that for Kim Soo-young, “form” means “ethical form.” Form has two different meanings to Kim Soo-young. First, form is “place of langue” where detailed aspects of life and problems are described. Thus, the poet tried to reveal and reproduce life by choosing and adopting specific nouns that were widely used in a daily life. Second, form is operation of language with which individual beings show differences. His choice and development of unique nouns which can be called “vacuum language” is a way to maximize mobility of language. In addition, repetition is a method that clearly demonstrates the poet’s concept of form. Through repetition, he showed various differences and acquired aesthetic novelty. Here, repetition does not mean repeating the same meaning of signifiers but exploring the potential of predicates by eradicating central and fixed meaning in sentences. That is, by repetition, the fixed meaning of a subject or a common noun was weakened while differences of exsistents and temporary phases were vividly expressed by predicates. Likewise, repetition is a formative way to narrate the real meaning and value of existents. In this regard, his poets have a ethical form that horizontally depicts the value of all existents. Kim Soo-young strived to figure out how “form” itself can include and reveal “content.” His poets display “content” through form. It is in line with his theory of poetry, so-called theory of the whole body and above all, his works are precious examples of “practices of literature,” which resisted to totalitarianism and standardization.
참고문헌 (30)
- 김수영, "김수영 전집 1-시" (2012), 민음사
- 김수영, "김수영 전집 2-산문" (2012), 민음사
- 고려대학교 현대시 연구회, "김수영 사전" (2012), 서정시학
- 권혁웅, "현대시에 나타난 리듬의 변주", 현대문학의 연구, (56), pp.335~367 (2015), 한국문학연구학회
- 게오르그 루카치, "영혼과 형식" (1988), 심설당
- 김영희, "김수영 시의 리듬 연구 - ‘시행발화(詩行發話)’를 중심으로", 우리어문연구, (31), pp.243~271 (2008), 우리어문학회
- 김종훈, "이상과 김수영 시에 나타난 반복의 상반된 의미", 한국문학이론과 비평, 19(1), pp.191~212 (2015), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 김준오, "시론" (2011), 삼지당
- 김홍중, "마음의 사회학" (2011), 문학동네
- 나희덕, "김수영 시의 리듬구조에 나타난 행과 연의 문제", 현대문학의 연구, (37), pp.303~326 (2009), 한국문학연구학회
- 로만 야콥슨, "문학 속의 언어학" (1989), 문학과 지성사
- 르네 웰렉, "문학의 이론" (2000), 을유문화사
- 마르틴 하이데거, "예술작품의 근원" (1994), 경문사
- 미셸 푸코, "말과 사물" (2013), 민음사
- 박연희, "김수영의 전통 인식과 자유주의 재론 -「거대한 뿌리」(1964)를 중심으로-", 상허학보, 33, pp.215~244 (2011), 상허학회
- 신익호, "김수영 시의 한시적(漢詩的) 구조의 병렬 반복 연구", 현대문학이론연구, (42), pp.19~44 (2010), 현대문학이론학회
- 서동욱, "들뢰즈의 철학" (2012), 민음사
- 오형엽, "김수영 시의 반복과 변주 연구", 한국언어문화, (51), pp.57~80 (2013), 한국언어문화학회
- 옥타비오 파스, "활과 리라" (1998), 솔출판사
- 옥타비오 파스, "흙의 자식들 외" (2003), 솔
- 에밀 슈타이거, "시학의 근본개념" (1978), 삼중당
- 이경수, "한국 현대시와 반복의 미학" (2005), 월인
- 이미순, "김수영의 언어론에 대한 연구", 개신어문연구, (31), pp.231~260 (2010), 개신어문학회
- 이승규, "김수영 시의 리듬 의식 연구", 어문론총, (46), pp.330~360 (2007), 한국문학언어학회
- 장석원, "문제는 형식이다", 시작, (가을), pp.54~68 (2008), 천년의 시작
- 장석원, "‘프로조디, 템포, 억양’을 통한 새로운 리듬 논의의 확대 -김수영의「사랑의 변주곡(變奏曲)」을 중심으로-", 국제어문, (52), pp.231~259 (2011), 국제어문학회
- 전은진, "김수영 시의 어휘 사용 양상과 공기어네트워크 분석", 한국언어문화, (53), pp.357~382 (2014), 한국언어문화학회
- 질 들뢰즈, "차이와 반복" (2011), 민음사
- 질 들뢰즈, "니체와 철학" (2012), 민음사
- 황동규, "김수영의 문학" (1983), 민음사
