본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

스마트기기에 탑재 가능한 애플리케이션 관련 발명의 특허권법상 보호 방안에 관한 연구

A Study on protecting an invention concerning an application for Smart Devices by Patent law

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper discusses a scheme for protecting inventions, distributed in the form of applications that can be installed on smart devices (hereinafter referred to as “app-related inventions”), based on intellectual property laws and the protection limits of the current copyright law and patent law. App-related inventions can be treated in the same manner as software-related inventions in the current patent law, and can be granted patents if they fulfill predetermined requirements. However, since in the case of app-related inventions, the developer of an application and the manufacturer of a smart device are not normally subject to a subordinate-superior or supervisory relationship and independently perform their respective practices without any economic connection therebetween, a problem arises in that the app-related inventions cannot be substantially protected by the current laws even when they have been patented. That is, in the case of an app-related invention in which one or more software elements are combined with one or more hardware elements, a contradiction may occur in that the practice of a patented invention by a single agent is recognized as an infringement but the practice of the patented invention by a plurality of agents is not recognized as an infringement. This paper discusses a scheme for mitigating the all elements rule and using the mitigated rule and a scheme for introducing the provisions of induced infringement and contributory infringement to the patent law and calling upon the developer of software or an application to take responsibility for infringement in order to substantially protect app-related inventions that are practiced by a plurality of agents.

Abstract

This paper discusses a scheme for protecting inventions, distributed in the form of applications that can be installed on smart devices (hereinafter referred to as “app-related inventions”), based on intellectual property laws and the protection limits of the current copyright law and patent law. App-related inventions can be treated in the same manner as software-related inventions in the current patent law, and can be granted patents if they fulfill predetermined requirements. However, since in the case of app-related inventions, the developer of an application and the manufacturer of a smart device are not normally subject to a subordinate-superior or supervisory relationship and independently perform their respective practices without any economic connection therebetween, a problem arises in that the app-related inventions cannot be substantially protected by the current laws even when they have been patented. That is, in the case of an app-related invention in which one or more software elements are combined with one or more hardware elements, a contradiction may occur in that the practice of a patented invention by a single agent is recognized as an infringement but the practice of the patented invention by a plurality of agents is not recognized as an infringement. This paper discusses a scheme for mitigating the all elements rule and using the mitigated rule and a scheme for introducing the provisions of induced infringement and contributory infringement to the patent law and calling upon the developer of software or an application to take responsibility for infringement in order to substantially protect app-related inventions that are practiced by a plurality of agents.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 김관식, "컴퓨터프로그램의 특허법상 보호에 관한 특허법 제2조 개정시안의 법적 의의 및 과제", 법학연구, 23(1), pp.549~582 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
  2. 온라인상에서의 BM특허침해 보호방안에 관한 연구, "김병일", 한국지식재산연구원, ~ (2003)
  3. 김수동, "BM특허제도의 世界的動向과 韓國에의 本格導入에 따른 問題點과 解決課題", 비교사법, 8(1) (2001), 한국비교사법학회
  4. 김수철, "특허침해에 있어서 공동불법행위 책임에 관한 고찰", 지식재산연구, 7(1), pp.1~28 (2012), 한국지식재산연구원
  5. 김원준, "BM발명의 특허적격성 판단기준에 관한 고찰 - In re Bilski 판결을 중심으로 -", 법학논총, 30(3), pp.133~176 (2010), 법학연구소
  6. 김찬동, "소프트웨어 특허 인정에 따른 대응방안에 관한 연구", 지적재산권, (25) (2008), 한국지적재산권법제연구원
  7. 김철환, "省略發明과 不完全利用論에 관한 小考", 특허소송연구, 3 (2005), 특허법원
  8. 박영규, "소프트웨어발명의 특허성 판단에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 산업재산권, (26), pp.141~174 (2008), 한국산업재산권법학회
  9. 육소영, "컴퓨터 프로그램의 특허성", 비교사법, 10(2), pp.481~512 (2003), 한국비교사법학회
  10. 이영환, "共同不法行爲의 成立範圍", 법학연구, 23(1) (1981), 부산대학교 법학연구소
  11. 이동형, "미국 연방대법원의 BILSKI 사건을 중심으로 본 비즈니스 모델의 특허적격성", 인터넷전자상거래연구, 12(1), pp.59~80 (2012), 한국인터넷전자상거래학회
  12. 정상조, "소프트웨어 特許의 현황과 과제", 비교사법, 14(3), pp.1199~1256 (2007), 한국비교사법학회
  13. 정재훈, "소프트웨어의 法的 保護", 창작과 권리, 35 (2004), 세창출판사
  14. 최형구, "소프트웨어의 특허법적 보호 필요성", 산업재산권, (23), pp.395~422 (2007), 한국산업재산권법학회
  15. 표호건, "소프트웨어관련 발명에서의 間接侵害問題와 複數主體에 의한 特許權侵害", 창작과 권리, (32) (2003), 세창출판사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)