본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유치권의 성립요건과 관련한 법적 문제

Legal Matters in connection with the Essential Condition of the Lien

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

A lien was initially developed from the right of 'exceptio doli' according to Roman Law to realize the fáirness dòctrine between two parties as a legal right granted by a way of security in the case where a person who occupies another's possession can refuse the right to return it until he/she is fully reimbursed for the bonds that they are entitled to related to the possession that they hold. Article 320 (1) of the Korean Civil Code that defines lien as one of the statutory real right granted by way of security requires expresses the connection-relation between a establishment as a claim arising with respect claim and subject matter applicable as an essential condition to determine its a thing or marketable securities and it leaves the issue of what claim would be applicable to the secured claim of the lien for the academic treaties and cases to cause conflicting opinions. When the person that possess does real estate has the credit that occurred about the real estate, the real estate lien forces repayment of the actually cover security credit as collateral security which can detain you until repayment receives the credit. Take the principle of undertaking that repays credit secured in line again in buyer of the actually real estate auction in 5 91 Clause of Article of the Civil Execution Act; there is it, but there is not report duty of line in real estate auction procedure. Therefore, buyer is the fact that cannot but collide with a lienor consisting of only the possession without the registration each other because the lienor does not say the formation right or wrong of the lien to the person who is going to do. The civil law takes the situation protecting the cover security credit of the lien to break a principle of the creditor equality by constituting a lien in legal right of the mortgagee relative to the credit of other creditors again; there is it. I explained about the main contents of Lien System and dealt with the important contents of Lien System and suggested especially the problems and improvements in connection with Essential Condition in Lien System.

Abstract

A lien was initially developed from the right of 'exceptio doli' according to Roman Law to realize the fáirness dòctrine between two parties as a legal right granted by a way of security in the case where a person who occupies another's possession can refuse the right to return it until he/she is fully reimbursed for the bonds that they are entitled to related to the possession that they hold. Article 320 (1) of the Korean Civil Code that defines lien as one of the statutory real right granted by way of security requires expresses the connection-relation between a establishment as a claim arising with respect claim and subject matter applicable as an essential condition to determine its a thing or marketable securities and it leaves the issue of what claim would be applicable to the secured claim of the lien for the academic treaties and cases to cause conflicting opinions. When the person that possess does real estate has the credit that occurred about the real estate, the real estate lien forces repayment of the actually cover security credit as collateral security which can detain you until repayment receives the credit. Take the principle of undertaking that repays credit secured in line again in buyer of the actually real estate auction in 5 91 Clause of Article of the Civil Execution Act; there is it, but there is not report duty of line in real estate auction procedure. Therefore, buyer is the fact that cannot but collide with a lienor consisting of only the possession without the registration each other because the lienor does not say the formation right or wrong of the lien to the person who is going to do. The civil law takes the situation protecting the cover security credit of the lien to break a principle of the creditor equality by constituting a lien in legal right of the mortgagee relative to the credit of other creditors again; there is it. I explained about the main contents of Lien System and dealt with the important contents of Lien System and suggested especially the problems and improvements in connection with Essential Condition in Lien System.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 고상룡, "물권법" (2002), 법문사
  2. 곽윤직, "물권법" (2003), 박영사
  3. 김계순, "유치권에 있어서 채권과 목적물 사이의 견련관계", 법학논집, 13(2), pp.29~49 (2009), 법학연구소
  4. 김상용, "물권법" (2009), 화산미디어
  5. 김원수, "압류(가압류)의 효력이 발생한 이후에 유치권을 취득한 자가 매수인(경락인)에게 대항할 수 있는지 여부 - 대법원 2005. 8. 19. 선고 2005다22688 판결 -", 판례연구, 18 (2007), 부산판례연구회
  6. 김증한, "물권법" (1998), 박영사
  7. 송덕수, "물권법" (2012), 박영사
  8. 최창렬, "유치권의 견련관계에 관한 연구", 재산법연구, 21(1), pp.89~119 (2004), 한국재산법학회
  9. 양창수, "유치권의 발생요건으로서의 채권과 물건간의 견련관계", 민법연구, 1 (1991), 박영사
  10. 오시영, "부동산유치권의 성립과 대항력의 구별", 민사법학, (38), pp.211~250 (2007), 한국민사법학회
  11. 이동진, "물권적 유치권의 정당성과 그 한계", 민사법학, 49(1), pp.49~88 (2010), 한국민사법학회
  12. 이상태, "물권법" (2011), 법원사
  13. 이영준, "物權法" (2009), 博英社
  14. 이은영, "물권법" (2006), 박영사
  15. 추신영, "假裝留置權의 進入制限을 위한 立法的 考察", 민사법학, (44), pp.351~383 (2009), 한국민사법학회
  16. 하경일, "경매와 유치권", 경영법무 (2006), 한국경영법무연구소
  17. 鈴木忠一, "註釋 民事執行法(2)" (1984), 第一法規
  18. 福永有利, "不動産上の權利關係の解明と賣却條件, In 民事執行法の基本構造" (1981), 西神田編輯室
  19. 田高寬貴, "個別執行と留置權 : 抵當權との衝突事例をめぐって, In ○擔保制度の現代的展開 : 伊藤進先生古稀記念論文集" (2007), 日本評論社
  20. 田井義信, "新物權ㆍ擔保物權法" (2005), 法律文化社
  21. 酒井一, "權利抗弁 : 留置權"ジュリスト 別冊 民事訴訟法判例百選" (2010), 有斐閣
  22. 淸水元, "留置權槪念の再構成" (1998), 一粒社
  23. 淸水元, "叢書民法總合判例硏究 : 留置權" (1999), 一粒社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)