判断表現「-と見る」と「-고 보다」に関する日·韓対照研究 ― 判断主体に注目して ―

Abstract

A Contrastive Study of Japanese-Korean Judgment Expressions : Focusing on the Subject of Judgment of ‘To-miru’ and ‘Ko-poda’ In this paper, the judgment expressions ‘to-miru’ and ‘ko-poda’ were considered, focusing on the subject of judgment. First, by examining whether the subject of judgment is the speaker (author), the listener (reader), or the third person, ‘to-miru’ appears frequently in the sentences of the third person subject(95.3%), and ‘ko-poda’ is the most common in the first person subject(62.2%). Second, considering the difference between the texts of newspapers and literature, this paper pointed out the lexical characteristics of subjects that appear frequently in each person. In the third person subject, both ‘to-miru’ and ‘ko-poda’ have common examples of organizations, members of organizations, experts, and many people, and occupy most of them. In the text of newspaper of ‘to-miru’, the number of organizations is the largest(55.2%), and among them, there are many investigative agencies. On the other hand, ‘ko-poda’ does not account for a large proportion of the newspaper text(19.2%), and among them, there are many examples of non-investigative agencies as a difference. Even in literary texts, ‘to-miru’ often appears in historical novels, and the judgment of historical figures is often indicated by ‘to-miru’, but in ‘ko-poda’ there are many examples of one individual. Also, in the first person subject, ‘to-miru’ has few examples as a whole, and in literature one individual’s examples are only two. But ‘ko-poda’ has the most examples, especially in editorials, colums, and opinions of newspaper. In literary texts, there are many examples of one individual. In the second person subject, ‘to-miru’ has few examples and is not decent sentence, whereas ‘ko-poda’ appears in newspaper interviews and dialogues, and is decent.