Corpus-Based Analysis of Thematic Structure in L2 Writing
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper reports an analysis of development in Korean students’ argumentative essays using a special analytical unit, Theme. Defined as the initial position of a sentence, Theme is where background information is condensed and connected to new arguments in a logical manner, and thus, can serve as a powerful method of development. Recognizing the lack of research on thematic progression in a Korean EFL context, this paper explores the pattern of thematic progression by comparing Korean students' argumentative essays (KSAE) collected from six different universities (200,469 words) to the Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays (LOCNESS), a 300,000-word collection of essays written by native speakers of English. The results show a significant difference between non-native and native speakers’ essays in all four key aspects of thematic structure: length, function, plurality, and semantic role. These findings indicate Korean students tend to overuse of highly formulaic and repetitive themes. Although the analysis is largely exploratory at this point, the approach taken in this paper shows the potential value of using Theme analysis for L2 writing pedagogy.
Abstract
This paper reports an analysis of development in Korean students’ argumentative essays using a special analytical unit, Theme. Defined as the initial position of a sentence, Theme is where background information is condensed and connected to new arguments in a logical manner, and thus, can serve as a powerful method of development. Recognizing the lack of research on thematic progression in a Korean EFL context, this paper explores the pattern of thematic progression by comparing Korean students' argumentative essays (KSAE) collected from six different universities (200,469 words) to the Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays (LOCNESS), a 300,000-word collection of essays written by native speakers of English. The results show a significant difference between non-native and native speakers’ essays in all four key aspects of thematic structure: length, function, plurality, and semantic role. These findings indicate Korean students tend to overuse of highly formulaic and repetitive themes. Although the analysis is largely exploratory at this point, the approach taken in this paper shows the potential value of using Theme analysis for L2 writing pedagogy.
참고문헌 (24)
- Belmonte, I. A., "Theme-Rheme patterns in L2 writing", Didactica, 10, pp.13~31 (1998)
- Bloor, M., "Given and new information in the thematic organization of text : An application to the teaching of academic writing", Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics, 6(1), pp.33~43 (1992)
- Crystal, D., "How language works" (2007), Penguin
- Downing, A., "An alternative approach to theme : A systemic-functional perspective", Word, 42(2), pp.119~143 (1991)
- Eggins, S., "An introduction to systemic functional linguistics" (2004), Continuum
- Fries, P. H., "Micro and macro connexity of texts", pp.116~152 (1983), Buske
- Fries, P. H., "Thematic development in English texts" (1995), Pinter
- Gomez, M., "Theme and textual organization", Journal of Words, 45(3), pp.293~305 (1994)
- Gosden, H., "Discourse functions of marked theme in scientific research articles", English for Specific Purposes, 11(3), pp.207~224 (1992)
- Gosden, H., "An aspect of holistic modeling in academic writing : Propositional clusters as a heuristic for thematic control", Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(1), pp.19~41 (1998)
- Halliday, M. A. K., "An introduction to functional grammar" (1994), Edward Arnold
- Halliday, M. A. K., "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman Group Ltd
- Halliday, M. A. K., "Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (Vol. 8)" (1994), CRC Press
- Halliday, M. A. K., "An introduction to functional grammar" (2004), Edward Arnold
- Halliday, M. A. K., "Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics" (2009), Continuum
- Herriman, J., "Themes and theme progression in Swedish advanced learners’ writing in English", Nordic Journal of English Studies, 10(1), pp.1~28 (2011)
- Ignatieva, N., "Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use" (2008)
- Martin, J. R., "English Text : System and Structure" (1992), John Benjamins
- Martı́nez, I. A., "Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of biology journal articles in English", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(2), pp.103~123 (2003)
- Mauranen, A., "Academic Writing: Intercultural and textual issues", pp.195~230 (1996), John Benjamins
- North, S., "Disciplinary variation in the use of theme in undergraduate essays", Applied Linguistics, 26(3), pp.431~452 (2005)
- Park, K., "Automatic analysis of thematic structure in written English", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(1), pp.82~102 (2015)
- Schleppegrell, M., "Linguistic features of the language of schooling", Linguistics and Education, 12(4), pp.431~459 (2001)
- Thompson, G., "Introducing functional grammar" (2004), Edward Arnold