본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Systemic Functional Study of Thematic Organization in the English Writing of Korean College Students

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Employing Halliday’s (1994) Systemic Functional Grammar approach, the present study examines the Korean EFL college students’ way of organizing thematic structures in written English texts, with special focus on the influence of learner proficiency. A total of 150 learners’ argumentative essays consisting of 50 essays each from three levels of learner groups were compared with 50 essays from its native counterparts, with inquiry focused on the thematic selection, usage of various theme features, and semantic distribution of topical themes. The results show that textual themes, multiple themes, and first person pronouns as topical themes are highly overused in the learner texts compared to the native essays. Overall, the level of proficiency significantly affects learners’ choices regarding thematic structures although the enhanced proficiency does not involve the improvement in all aspects of thematic organization. From these findings, it is suggested that the EFL writing pedagogy should pay greater attention to the effective use of thematic organization as a means of enhancing textual coherence and embrace level-specific instructions.

Abstract

Employing Halliday’s (1994) Systemic Functional Grammar approach, the present study examines the Korean EFL college students’ way of organizing thematic structures in written English texts, with special focus on the influence of learner proficiency. A total of 150 learners’ argumentative essays consisting of 50 essays each from three levels of learner groups were compared with 50 essays from its native counterparts, with inquiry focused on the thematic selection, usage of various theme features, and semantic distribution of topical themes. The results show that textual themes, multiple themes, and first person pronouns as topical themes are highly overused in the learner texts compared to the native essays. Overall, the level of proficiency significantly affects learners’ choices regarding thematic structures although the enhanced proficiency does not involve the improvement in all aspects of thematic organization. From these findings, it is suggested that the EFL writing pedagogy should pay greater attention to the effective use of thematic organization as a means of enhancing textual coherence and embrace level-specific instructions.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. Aijmer, K., "Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching", pp.55~76 (2002), John Benjamins
  2. Biber, D., "On the investigation of spoken", written differences, 1986, pp.40, 1~38
  3. Biber, D., "Representativeness in corpus design", Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), pp.243~257 (1993)
  4. Bloor, M., "Given and new information in the thematic organization of text : An application to the teaching of academic writing", Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics, 6(1), pp.33~43 (1992)
  5. Bolton, K., "A corpus-based study of connectors in student writing : Research from international corpus of English in Hong Kong(ICE-HK)", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 7(2), pp.165~182 (2002)
  6. Brown, G., "Discourse analysis" (1983), Cambridge University Press
  7. Chafe, W., "How people use adverbial clauses", Berkeley Linguistics Society, 10, pp.437~449 (1984)
  8. Chang, Y. Y., "Writing: Texts, processes and practices", pp.145~167 (1999), Longman
  9. Crowhurst, M., "Cohesion in argument and narration at three grade levels", Research in the Teaching of English, 21(2), pp.185~201 (1987)
  10. Eggins, S., "Introduction to systemic functional linguistics" (2004), Continuum
  11. Fontaine, L., "The role of thematic and concept texture in scientific text : Comparing native and non-native writers of English", La Revue du GERAS Journal, 5, pp.1~23 (2011)
  12. Francis, G., "Theme in the daily press", Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics, 4, pp.51~87 (1990)
  13. Fries, P. H., "On the status of theme in English : Arguments from discourse", Forum Linguisticum, 6(1), pp.1~38 (1983)
  14. Fries, P. H., "On subject and theme: From the perspective of functions in discourse", pp.317~359 (1995), John Benjamins
  15. Ghadessy, M., "Thematic organisation in academic article abstracts", Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 7, pp.141~161 (1999)
  16. Ghadessy, M., "Thematic organization in parallel texts : Same and different methods of development", Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 20(4), pp.461~488 (2000)
  17. Gómez, M., "Theme and textual organization", Journal of Words, 45(3), pp.293~305 (1994)
  18. Gosden, H., "Discourse functions of marked theme in scientific research articles", English for Specific Purposes, 11(3), pp.207~224 (1992)
  19. Granger, S., "Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non‐native EFL speakers of English", World Englishes, 15(1), pp.17~27 (1996)
  20. Green, C. F., "The incidence and effects on coherence of marked theme in interlanguage texts : A Corpus-based Enquiry", English for Specific Purposes, 19(2), pp.99~113 (2000)
  21. Halliday, M. A. K., "An introduction to functional grammar" (1994), Edward Arnold
  22. Halliday, M. A. K., "Halliday's introduction to functional grammar" (2013), Taylor & Francis
  23. Hasselgren, A., "Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners : A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), pp.237~258 (1994)
  24. Hawes, T., "Problems of thematisation in student writing", RELC Journal, 28(2), pp.35~55 (1997)
  25. Herriman, J., "Themes and theme progression in Swedish advanced learners’ writing in English", Nordic Journal of English Studies, 10(1), pp.1~28 (2011)
  26. Hewings, A., "Analysing academic writing:Contextualized frameworks" (2004), Continuum
  27. Hinkel, E., "The use of model verbs as a reflection of cultural values", TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), pp.325~343 (1995)
  28. Grammatical structures written at three grade levels, "Hunt,K.W", National Council of Teachers of English, ~, pp.NCTE research report no. 3 (1965)
  29. Hyland, K., "Persuasion and context : The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse", Journal of Pragmatics, 30(4), pp.437~455 (1998)
  30. Hyland, K., "Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing" (2004), University of Michigan Press
  31. Alireza Jalilifar, "Thematic Development in English and Translated Academic Texts", Journal of Universal Language, 10(1), pp.81~111 (2009), 언어연구소
  32. Jalilifar, A., "The status of theme in applied linguistics articles", Asian ESP Journal, 6(2), pp.7~39 (2010)
  33. Kim, J. H., "Korean advanced learners’ theme choices as linguistic option in L2 writing:A comparative study with the native corpus", Master, pp.2012
  34. 이성우, "Connectors as Textual Orienting Themes in Korean and Australian Student Essay Writing", 영어교육, 62(1), pp.121~147 (2007), 한국영어교육학회
  35. 이성우, "Investigating Ideational Thematic Content in Korean University Student Essay Writing", 영어교육, 63(2), pp.71~94 (2008), 한국영어교육학회
  36. Lu, X., "Research and practice in professional discourse", pp.589~608 (2002), City University of Hong Kong Press
  37. Martı́nez, I. A., "Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of biology journal articles in English", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(2), pp.103~123 (2003)
  38. Mauranen, A., "Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues", pp.195~230 (1996), John Benjamins
  39. 남대현, "Corpus-Based Analysis of Thematic Structure in L2 Writing", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 18(4), pp.99~120 (2015), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
  40. North, S., "Disciplinary variation in the use of theme in undergraduate essays", Applied Linguistics, 26(3), pp.431~452 (2005)
  41. Oh, S. Y., "The effect of English proficiency on Korean undergraduates'expression of epistemic modality in English argumentative writing", The Journal of Asia TEFL, 10(4), pp.97~132 (2013)
  42. Park, K., "Automatic analysis of thematic structure in written English", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(1), pp.81~101 (2015)
  43. 박광현, "Analysis of Thematic Structure in L2 Writing: A Systemic Functional Perspective", The SNU Journal of Education Research, 24, pp.65~88 (2015), 교육종합연구원
  44. Ping, A. L., "Developing the message : Thematic progression and student writing", The Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(3), pp.93~127 (2007)
  45. Reid, J., "A computer text analysis of four cohesion devices in English discourse by native and nonnative writers", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(2), pp.79~107 (1992)
  46. Rutherford, W. E., "Second language grammar : Learning and teaching" (1987), Routledge
  47. Scarcella, R. C., "How writers orient their readers in expository essays : A comparative study of native and non-native English writers", TESOL Quarterly, 18(4), pp.671~688 (1984)
  48. Schwarz, L., "Text resources and lexical knowledge: Selected papers from the 9th conference on natural language processing", pp.15~26 (2008), Mouton de Gruyter
  49. Thompson, G., "Introducing functional grammar" (2004), Edward Arnold
  50. Vande Kopple, W. J., "Theme, thematic progressions, and some implications for understanding discourse", Written Communication, 8(3), pp.311~347 (1991)
  51. Wang, I., "Theme and rheme in the thematic organization of texts : Implications for teaching academic writing", Asian EFL Journal, 9(1), pp.164~176 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)