Task Characteristics of a Computerized TTS Dictation Test and Diagnostic Interpretability of Qualitative Error Analysis
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present study attempted to explore the overall efficacy of a computerized text-to-speech dictation test in terms of the task characteristics and the diagnostic interpretability of the test results through automatized error analysis. The computerized dictation test was designed to be conducted in the following four stages: first, subjects listened to the entire passage; second, they typed what they heard; third, they revised their answers (in two different modes: with and without feedback on the previous input); fourth, the computer displayed their scores. Based on the data analysis conducted by the automated scoring program, the research findings revealed the following: 1) the test task characteristics (the absence and presence of immediate feedback on students’ answers and the test item length) of computerized dictation test exerted a significant impact on test taking strategies and subsequent performance; 2) the function word errors were revised less frequently than the content word errors, revealing a problem with students’ comprehension of unstressed phonological sandhi phenomena; 3) the qualitative error analysis implied the diagnostic potential of the computerized dictation test; and 4) the computer-based dictation test was preferable to the conventional paper-based version.
Abstract
The present study attempted to explore the overall efficacy of a computerized text-to-speech dictation test in terms of the task characteristics and the diagnostic interpretability of the test results through automatized error analysis. The computerized dictation test was designed to be conducted in the following four stages: first, subjects listened to the entire passage; second, they typed what they heard; third, they revised their answers (in two different modes: with and without feedback on the previous input); fourth, the computer displayed their scores. Based on the data analysis conducted by the automated scoring program, the research findings revealed the following: 1) the test task characteristics (the absence and presence of immediate feedback on students’ answers and the test item length) of computerized dictation test exerted a significant impact on test taking strategies and subsequent performance; 2) the function word errors were revised less frequently than the content word errors, revealing a problem with students’ comprehension of unstressed phonological sandhi phenomena; 3) the qualitative error analysis implied the diagnostic potential of the computerized dictation test; and 4) the computer-based dictation test was preferable to the conventional paper-based version.
참고문헌 (24)
- Bachman, L. F., "Fundamental considerations in language testing" (1990), Oxford University Press
- Bachman, L. F., "Language testing in practice" (1996), Oxford University Press
- Brown, D. H., "Principles of language learning and teaching" (2000), Addison Wesley Longman
- 최인철, "An Exploratory Validation Study of Computer-based Dictation Tests Utilizing TTS", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 18(4), pp.11~41 (2015), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
- Choi, I-C., "Efficacy of an ICALL tutoring system and process oriented corrective feedback", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), pp.334~364 (2016)
- Choi, Y., "An experimental study of the principal difficulty factors in English listening comprehension", MA, pp.1997
- Coniam, D., "Interactive evaluation of listening comprehension : How the context may help", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11(1), pp.35~53 (1998)
- Corder, S. P., "Error analysis and interlanguage" (1981), Oxford University Press
- Davis, P., "Dictation: New methods, new possibilities" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Donald, E. P., "Validity: What does it mean for the TOEIC Tests?" (2010), ETS
- Ellis, R., "The study of second language acquisition", pp.351~352 (1994), Oxford University Press
- Irvine, P., "Cloze, dictation, and the test of English as a foreign language", Language Learning, 24(2), pp.245~252 (1974)
- Kim, S-J., "Error analysis of English dictation", MA, pp.2001
- 김우영, "Using Dictation Tests to Improve English Language Proficiency in EFL Situations", 영어어문교육, 14(4), pp.73~92 (2008), 한국영어어문교육학회
- Lee, K-H., "Study on the efficiency of dictation as a method of English listening comprehension and its teaching model", MA, pp.2002
- 이선주, "An analysis of the validity of the computerized dictation test and its scoring method", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 9(2), pp.174~196 (2006), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회
- McNamara, T., "Language testing" (2001), Oxford University Press
- EFL Listening and Speaking, "Teaching ESL", pp.2008, Nation, I. S. P.
- Oller, J. W., "Language tests at school: A pragmatic approach" (1979), Longman
- Primsleur, P., "Viewpoints on English as a second language", pp.27~34 (1977), Regents
- Richards, J. C., "A non-contrastive approach to error analysis", English Language Teaching Journal, 25, pp.204~229 (1974)
- Shohamy, E., "Does the testing method make a difference? The case of reading comprehension", Language Testing, 1(2), pp.147~170 (1984)
- Valette, R. M., "Modern language testing" (1977), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc
- Vandergrift, L., "Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research", Language Teaching, 40, pp.191~210 (2007)
