The Impact of Peer Response on Lexis and Grammatical Structure in L2 Writing through Blended Learning
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Peer response has been considered one of significant activities to improve learners’ writing skills in second language (L2) writing classes. However, a few studies have been examined in terms of peer response focusing on lexis and grammatical structure in a blended learning environment. This study aims to explore these feedback types of lexis and grammatical structure in peer response, and to investigate the influence of peer response on students’ lexis and grammatical structure in L2 writing in a blended learning environment. A case study was conducted on eight university students who were enrolled in an English writing course and engaged in online and offline peer response sessions. The findings are as follows. First, the most repeatedly occurring feedback type was Direct Correction, and more Indirect Correction occurred in online peer response sessions. More language related episodes (LREs) were produced in online peer response sessions than in the offline context. Second, there were increases in scores from Essay 1 to Essay 4. The students’ active participation in peer response sessions throughout blended learning seemed to have a positive influence on their lexis and grammatical structure in L2 writing. Suggestions are made for content literacy in L2 writing and further research directions.
Abstract
Peer response has been considered one of significant activities to improve learners’ writing skills in second language (L2) writing classes. However, a few studies have been examined in terms of peer response focusing on lexis and grammatical structure in a blended learning environment. This study aims to explore these feedback types of lexis and grammatical structure in peer response, and to investigate the influence of peer response on students’ lexis and grammatical structure in L2 writing in a blended learning environment. A case study was conducted on eight university students who were enrolled in an English writing course and engaged in online and offline peer response sessions. The findings are as follows. First, the most repeatedly occurring feedback type was Direct Correction, and more Indirect Correction occurred in online peer response sessions. More language related episodes (LREs) were produced in online peer response sessions than in the offline context. Second, there were increases in scores from Essay 1 to Essay 4. The students’ active participation in peer response sessions throughout blended learning seemed to have a positive influence on their lexis and grammatical structure in L2 writing. Suggestions are made for content literacy in L2 writing and further research directions.
참고문헌 (45)
- Brown, S., "Assessment for learning", Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), pp.81~89 (2004)
- Carson, J. G., "Writing groups : Cross-cultural issues", Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(1), pp.17~30 (1994)
- Caulk, N., "Comparing teacher and student responses to written work", TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), pp.181~188 (1994)
- 차윤정, "Effects of Blended Peer Feedback Modes on Learners’ Writing Performance and Perspectives", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 17(2), pp.11~42 (2014), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
- 최호성, "Interactional Details in Group Peer Feedback in an L2 Writing Class", 현대영어교육, 13(1), pp.133~147 (2012), 현대영어교육학회
- Cohen, A. D., "Reformulation : A technique for providing advanced feedback in writing", Guidelines : A Periodical for Classroom Language Teachers, 11(2), pp.1~9 (1989)
- De Nisi, A. S., "Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved?", Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), pp.129~139 (2000)
- Ellis, R., "A typology of written corrective feedback types", ELT Journal, 63(2), pp.97~107 (2008)
- Ferris, D. R., "Response to student writing: Implications for second language students" (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc
- Ferris, D. R., "Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice" (2005), LawrenceErlbaum
- Hansen, J. G., "Guiding principles for effective peer response", ELT Journal, 59(1), pp.31~38 (2005)
- Hyland, K., "Feedback on second language students' writing", Language Teaching, 39(2), pp.83~101 (2006)
- Jarvis, S., "Capturing the diversity in lexical diversity", Language Learning, 63(1), pp.87~106 (2013)
- 전재영, "웹기반 피드백 유형이 대학생들의 영작문 능력과태도에 미치는 영향", 영어어문교육, 11(1), pp.179~202 (2005), 한국영어어문교육학회
- 강동호, "Feedback on EFL Writing: Teacher, Peer, and Self-review", Foreign Languages Education, 15(1), pp.1~22 (2008), 한국외국어교육학회
- Kaufman, J. H., "Students' perceptions about peer assessment for writing : Their origin and impact on revision work", Instructional Science, 39(3), pp.387~406 (2011)
- Kellogg, R. T., "Training advanced writing skills : The case for deliberate practice", Educational Psychologist, 44(4), pp.250~266 (2009)
- 김보람, "Examining the Effects of Trained Peer Feedback on EFL Students’ Writing", 영어어문교육, 15(2), pp.151~168 (2009), 한국영어어문교육학회
- Laufer, B., "Vocabulary size and use : Lexical richness in L2 written production", Applied Linguistics, 16(3), pp.307~322 (1995)
- Lee, C. H., "Principles and applications of MALL: Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning" (2015), Book Korea
- 이수진, "Effects of Corrective Feedback on Grammatical Accuracy of EFL Writing", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 16(11), pp.963~983 (2016), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
- Lizzio, A., "Feedback on assessment : Students' perception of quality and effectiveness", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), pp.263~275 (2008)
- Mendonça, C. O., "Peer review negotiation : Revision activities in ESL writing instruction", TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), pp.745~769 (1994)
- Moon, Y. I., "The nature of peer revisions in an EFL writing class of a Korean university", English Teaching, 55(1), pp.119~140 (2000)
- Mostert, M., "Where angels fear to tread : Online peer-assessment in a large first-year class", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), pp.674~686 (2013)
- Oshima, A., "Academic Writing Series 4 : Essays" (2013), Pearson Education
- Panova, I., "Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom", TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), pp.573~595 (2002)
- 박찬숙, "The Effect of Self and Peer Feedback: Learner Autonomy in High School Writing Classes", 현대영어교육, 17(3), pp.53~77 (2016), 현대영어교육학회
- 박은영, "웹기반 영작문교육에서의 동료수정 양상 연구", 영어어문교육, 10(1), pp.107~126 (2004), 한국영어어문교육학회
- 장서현, "Korean English Writers’ Noticing Peer Errors and Incorporation of Peer Feedback", 영어어문교육, 22(2), pp.65~86 (2016), 한국영어어문교육학회
- Pica, T., "Second-language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom", Applied Linguistics, 8, pp.3~21 (1987)
- Rollinson, P., "Peer response and revision in an ESL writing group: A case study", Ph. D., pp.1998
- Rollinson, P., "Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class", ELT Journal, 59(1), pp.23~30 (2005)
- Russell, J., "Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching", pp.133~164 (2006), John Benjamins
- Shih, R. C., "Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? integrating facebook and peer assessment with blended learning", Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), pp.829~845 (2011)
- So, L., "The effects of L2 writing instruction and peer response through blended learning on the development of students’ writing ability in higher education", doctoral, pp.2015
- 소리, "Peer Feedback Using Blended Learning in L2 Writing at the University Level", 영어교육, 67(3), pp.307~337 (2012), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
- 소리, "The Impact of Peer Response on L2 Writing in Blended Learning in Higher Education", 응용언어학, 30(4), pp.205~234 (2014), 한국응용언어학회
- Teo, A. K., "Social-interactive writing for English language learners", The CATESOL Journal, 18, pp.160~178 (2006)
- Tsui, A., "Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), pp.147~170 (2000)
- Yang, Y. F., "Students' reflection on online self-correction and peer review to improve writing", Computers & Education, 55(3), pp.1202~1210 (2010)
- 윤서영, "Students’ Reflection on Feedback in L2 Writing in Blended Learning", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 14(2), pp.235~261 (2011), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
- 윤서영, "The Perspectives and Effectiveness of Blended Learning in L2 Writing of Korean University Students", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 13(2), pp.177~204 (2010), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
- Zamel, V., "The composing processes of advanced ESL students : Six case studies", TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), pp.165~187 (1983)
- Zamel, V., "Recent research on writing pedagogy", TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), pp.697~715 (1987)
