Determining Specificity of L2 Peer Response in Learning Management System-Based Writing
3
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Second language (L2) peer response literature is defined in part by discourse research, yet there is scant research on text-specific comments, or comments that make explicit text references, thus resisting generic qualities. The purpose of this case study was to examine such peer response activities in an English writing course at a South Korean university. The data comprises two essay assignments with peer response conducted between two drafts – as accomplished during class time on the class learning management system (LMS) – as well as the subsequent revisions in second drafts. This paper expands on previous coding schemes accounting for area, nature and type commentary to account for a specificity dimension, and also links these categories to revision practices. While students entertained diverse commenting and revising options, popular practices included generic evaluating or revising local or surface-level concerns. This paper offers implications for modelling response activities as well as for how to better define specific and complex idea construction exhibited during response.
Abstract
Second language (L2) peer response literature is defined in part by discourse research, yet there is scant research on text-specific comments, or comments that make explicit text references, thus resisting generic qualities. The purpose of this case study was to examine such peer response activities in an English writing course at a South Korean university. The data comprises two essay assignments with peer response conducted between two drafts – as accomplished during class time on the class learning management system (LMS) – as well as the subsequent revisions in second drafts. This paper expands on previous coding schemes accounting for area, nature and type commentary to account for a specificity dimension, and also links these categories to revision practices. While students entertained diverse commenting and revising options, popular practices included generic evaluating or revising local or surface-level concerns. This paper offers implications for modelling response activities as well as for how to better define specific and complex idea construction exhibited during response.
참고문헌 (32)
- Berg, E. C., "The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.215~241 (1999)
- Bradley, L., "Peer-reviewing in an intercultural wiki environment-student interaction and reflections", Computers and Composition, 34, pp.80~95 (2014)
- Breuch, L. A. K., "Virtual peer review: Teaching and learning about writing in online environments" (2004), State University of New York Press
- Chafe, W. L., "The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production" (1980), Ablex
- Chang, C. F., "Peer review via three modes in an EFL writing course", Computers and Composition, 29(1), pp.63~78 (2012)
- Chang, C. Y. H., "Two decades of research in L2 peer review", Journal of Writing Research, 8(1), pp.81~117 (2016)
- Connor, U., "Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), pp.257~276 (1994)
- Conrad, S., "ESL student revision after teacher-written comments : Text, contexts, and individuals", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), pp.147~179 (1999)
- de Guerrero, M., "Social‐cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision", The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), pp.484~496 (1994)
- Ferris, D., "The influence of teacher commentary on student revision", TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), pp.315~339 (1997)
- Ferris, D. R., "Response to student writing: Implications for second language students" (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Ferris, D., "Responding to L2 students in college writing classes : Teacher perspectives", TESOL Quarterly, 45(2), pp.207~234 (2011)
- Gascoigne, C., "Examining the effect of feedback in beginning L2 composition", Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), pp.71~76 (2004)
- Guardado, M., "ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback", Computers and Composition, 24(4), pp.443~461 (2007)
- Hall, C., "Managing the complexity of revising across languages", TESOL Quarterly, 24(1), pp.43~60 (1990)
- Halliday, M. A. K., "Notes on transitivity and theme in English Part I", Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), pp.37~81 (1967)
- Ho, M., "The effects of face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review on EFL writers’ comments and revisions", Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), pp.1~15 (2015)
- Hyland, K., "Methods and methodologies in second language writing research", System, 59, pp.116~125 (2016)
- Liou, H. C., "Training effects on computer-mediated peer review", System, 37(3), pp.514~525 (2009)
- Liu, J., "The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(3), pp.193~227 (2003)
- Lockhart, C., "Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups : Stances, functions, and content", Language Learning, 45(4), pp.605~651 (1995)
- Mangelsdorf, K., "ESL student response stances in a peer-review task", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), pp.235~254 (1992)
- McGroarty, M. E., "Triangulation in classroom research : A study of peer revision", Language Learning, 47(1), pp.1~43 (1997)
- Mendonça, C. O., "Peer review negotiations : Revision activities in ESL writing instruction", TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), pp.745~769 (1994)
- Nelson, G. L., "An L2 writing group : Task and social dimensions", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), pp.171~193 (1992)
- Nelson, G. L., "Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts?", TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), pp.135~141 (1993)
- Nelson, M. M., "The nature of feedback : How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance", Instructional Science, 37(4), pp.375~401 (2009)
- "Higher order concerns (hocs) and lower order concerns (locs)"[URL]
- Reid, J., "Responding to ESL students’ texts : The myths of appropriation", TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), pp.273~292 (1994)
- Stanley, J., "Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), pp.217~233 (1992)
- Van Waes, L., "Learning to write in an online writing center : The effect of learning styles on the writing process", Computers & Education, 73, pp.60~71 (2014)
- Zhu, W., "Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups", Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), pp.251~276 (2001)