본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

재조일본인 아동용 『심상소학교 보충교본』의 내용과 그 성격

The contents and its character of “Supplement teaching materials of a small study school”

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This study is about the contents and characteristics of ‘Sim-Sang elementaryschool supplementing textbook(3 volumes)’ for Japanese residents in Korea that Inewly found out. These days, studies about textbooks written by JoseonChongdokbuare actively being conducted. Many of them are about ‘elementary school(=ES)’ forKorean kids, and researches of ‘ES Japanese Language’, ‘ES Korean Language’, ‘ESHistory’, and ‘ES Ethics’ are now on the way separately. However, these studiesmay have some problems. First, Lack of viewpoint about textbook writers.Second,hard to understand the writer’s holistic intention and the development process dueto the studies limited to each subject. Third, Indifferent to textbooks for Japanesebecause preceding researches have been one-sided to ‘ES textbooks’. I think youcan find out the reality by comparing and contrasting textbooks of MEXT1) , andtextbooks for Korean and Japanese written byChongdokbu. This study is considering the background and characteristic of ‘supplementingtextbook’(Japanese, ethics, math) for Japanese residents in Korea, mainly about 立柄敎俊 who wrote the 1st edition of Japanese and ethics inJoseonChongdokbu. Incomparison with the fact that they were conscious of Koreans in writing EStextbooks for Korean, supplementing textbooks for Japanese residents were relativelyfree to Koreans and had a strong ideology. What is remarkable is that 小田省吾課長 and 立柄編修官, main figures of theeducation and management bureau, eagerly tried to write textbooks in order to helpstudents get interested and motivated. That’s why they used Korean folk tales inwriting textbooks. But deliberately arranging folk tales about harmony betweenJapan and Korea from Korean folklores was the problem. This research reveals the characteristic of supplementing textbooks by investigating and comparing the Korean folk tales to the textbooks for Korean. In short, first,textbooks for 2nd and 3rd grade had a stronger sense of political ideology than for1st grade. Second, tried giving a sense of superiority and duty to Japanese kids. Third,dealt with books about harmony between Japan and Korea to help Japanese kidsget along with Korean kids. Fourth, exaggerated the similarity between Japan andJoseon. In this way, ‘supplementing textbook’ is trying to justify the colonial ruleby showing Joseon and Japan come from the same root as well as exaggeratingthe sense of duty and superiority.

Abstract

This study is about the contents and characteristics of ‘Sim-Sang elementaryschool supplementing textbook(3 volumes)’ for Japanese residents in Korea that Inewly found out. These days, studies about textbooks written by JoseonChongdokbuare actively being conducted. Many of them are about ‘elementary school(=ES)’ forKorean kids, and researches of ‘ES Japanese Language’, ‘ES Korean Language’, ‘ESHistory’, and ‘ES Ethics’ are now on the way separately. However, these studiesmay have some problems. First, Lack of viewpoint about textbook writers.Second,hard to understand the writer’s holistic intention and the development process dueto the studies limited to each subject. Third, Indifferent to textbooks for Japanesebecause preceding researches have been one-sided to ‘ES textbooks’. I think youcan find out the reality by comparing and contrasting textbooks of MEXT1) , andtextbooks for Korean and Japanese written byChongdokbu. This study is considering the background and characteristic of ‘supplementingtextbook’(Japanese, ethics, math) for Japanese residents in Korea, mainly about 立柄敎俊 who wrote the 1st edition of Japanese and ethics inJoseonChongdokbu. Incomparison with the fact that they were conscious of Koreans in writing EStextbooks for Korean, supplementing textbooks for Japanese residents were relativelyfree to Koreans and had a strong ideology. What is remarkable is that 小田省吾課長 and 立柄編修官, main figures of theeducation and management bureau, eagerly tried to write textbooks in order to helpstudents get interested and motivated. That’s why they used Korean folk tales inwriting textbooks. But deliberately arranging folk tales about harmony betweenJapan and Korea from Korean folklores was the problem. This research reveals the characteristic of supplementing textbooks by investigating and comparing the Korean folk tales to the textbooks for Korean. In short, first,textbooks for 2nd and 3rd grade had a stronger sense of political ideology than for1st grade. Second, tried giving a sense of superiority and duty to Japanese kids. Third,dealt with books about harmony between Japan and Korea to help Japanese kidsget along with Korean kids. Fourth, exaggerated the similarity between Japan andJoseon. In this way, ‘supplementing textbook’ is trying to justify the colonial ruleby showing Joseon and Japan come from the same root as well as exaggeratingthe sense of duty and superiority.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 강재철, "조선총독부가 1913년에 전국적으로 실시한 조선설화조사자료의 발굴과 그에 따른 해제 및 설화학적 검토", 비교민속학, (48), pp.273~306 (2012), 비교민속학회
  2. 강진호, "조선어독본(1~5권)" (2010), 제이앤씨
  3. 김순전, "일제강점기 일본어교과서 국어독본을 통해 본 식민지조선 만들기" (2012), 제이앤씨
  4. 김광식, "조선총독부 편찬 일본어교과서 『국어독본』의 조선설화 수록 과정 고찰", 淵民學志, 18 (2012), 연민학회
  5. 이시준, "1910년대 조선총독부 학무국 편집과가 실시한 조선 민간전승 조사 고찰 -1913년 보고집 『전설동화 조사사항(傳説童話調査事項)』을 중심으로-", 일본문화연구, (44), pp.523~544 (2012), 동아시아일본학회
  6. 장신, "조선총독부 교과서 총서 1권" (2006), 청운
  7. 조선총독부학무국, "전설동화조사사항" (2012), 제이앤씨
  8. 高橋亨, "조선 이야기집과 속담" (2012), 제이앤씨
  9. 김광식, "植民地朝鮮と帝国日本" (2010), 勉誠出版
  10. 渡部宗助他, "日本植民地⋅占領地の敎科書に關する總合的比較硏究", pp.2009
  11. 小田省吾, "合倂前後の敎科書編纂に就て", 朝鮮及滿洲, 235, pp.40~ (1935)
  12. 立柄敎俊君談, "朝鮮に於ける敎科書編纂事業に就きて", 敎育時論, 966 (1912)
  13. 立柄敎俊, "小學校敎育法, In 公立小學校敎員講習會講演集" (1913), 朝鮮總督府
  14. 立柄敎俊, "國民性統一と民族同化, In 中島敎授在職 二十五年 記念 論文集", pp.165~ (1919), 目黑書店
  15. 立柄敎俊, "尋常小學校補充敎本(朝鮮に於ける內地人學校用)に就て", 朝鮮敎育, (64) (1921)
  16. 朝鮮總督府, "普通學校 國語補充敎材" (1911)
  17. 朝鮮總督府, "尋常小學校補充敎本 전3권" (1920)
  18. 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮總督府及所屬官署 職員錄 전33권" (2009), ゆまに書房
  19. 朝鮮公論社, "在朝鮮內地人 紳士名鑑" (1917)
  20. 朝鮮中央経濟會, "京城市民名鑑" (1921)
  21. 中村榮孝, "朝鮮に於ける國史敎育, In 朝鮮" (1940)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (27건)