본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

公海漁業에서의 非旗國 規制에 관한 硏究

A Study on the Non-flag Enforcement in the High Seas Fisheries

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

This article is an overview of the non-flag enforcement, (boarding and inspection on the high seas). The non-flag enforcement developed as one of the methods to resolve problems related to the conservation and management of the marine resources living in the high seas under the 1982 United Nations Law of Sea Convention. In this respect, the objective of this research is to investigate : firstly, the main contents and problems regarding the conservation and management of marine resources living in the high seas, secondly, the trend and content of newly developed order of high seas fisheries including non-flag enforcement, and lastly finding out the actual condition of the high seas under the non-flag enforcement, (boarding and inspection on the high seas) which is controled by the regional fishery organization. The result of research are as follows. Firstly, it appears clear that the necessity of building a newly developed order of high seas fisheries is not only a failure of control and regulation by flag state against their fishing vessels on the high seas, but also is incomplete regarding the conservation and management of resources marine living in the high seas. Secondly, it was found that the international fishery legal instruments which developed after the 1982 United Nations Law of the Sea Convention included several epoch-making principles to resolve the problems that originated from the conservation and management of high seas fisheries. Thirdly, it was proved that some of the regional fisheries organizations such as NAFO, CCBSP, NPAFC and CCAMLR have been operating the non-flag enforcement since before the 1982 United Nations law of the Sea Convention. A newly established regional fisheries organization, WCPFC has also contained the non-flag enforcement under the 1995 High Seas Fish Stocks Agreement. It can be interpreted that the introduction of non-flag enforcement against the high seas fishing vessels, through the fundamental amendment of one of the principles(a fishing vessels on the high seas against the exclusive jurisdiction rights by their flag state) of international law was inevitable considering the urgency to build a sustainable conservation and management norms for high seas fisheries. To achieve the intended goals of non-flag enforcement, we need to complete the participation and cooperation of groups which have been interested in high seas fisheries. However, considering the practice of high seas fisheries, especially the position of high seas fishery's nations, a substantial settlement of this system and the non-flag enforcement may take time.

Abstract

This article is an overview of the non-flag enforcement, (boarding and inspection on the high seas). The non-flag enforcement developed as one of the methods to resolve problems related to the conservation and management of the marine resources living in the high seas under the 1982 United Nations Law of Sea Convention. In this respect, the objective of this research is to investigate : firstly, the main contents and problems regarding the conservation and management of marine resources living in the high seas, secondly, the trend and content of newly developed order of high seas fisheries including non-flag enforcement, and lastly finding out the actual condition of the high seas under the non-flag enforcement, (boarding and inspection on the high seas) which is controled by the regional fishery organization. The result of research are as follows. Firstly, it appears clear that the necessity of building a newly developed order of high seas fisheries is not only a failure of control and regulation by flag state against their fishing vessels on the high seas, but also is incomplete regarding the conservation and management of resources marine living in the high seas. Secondly, it was found that the international fishery legal instruments which developed after the 1982 United Nations Law of the Sea Convention included several epoch-making principles to resolve the problems that originated from the conservation and management of high seas fisheries. Thirdly, it was proved that some of the regional fisheries organizations such as NAFO, CCBSP, NPAFC and CCAMLR have been operating the non-flag enforcement since before the 1982 United Nations law of the Sea Convention. A newly established regional fisheries organization, WCPFC has also contained the non-flag enforcement under the 1995 High Seas Fish Stocks Agreement. It can be interpreted that the introduction of non-flag enforcement against the high seas fishing vessels, through the fundamental amendment of one of the principles(a fishing vessels on the high seas against the exclusive jurisdiction rights by their flag state) of international law was inevitable considering the urgency to build a sustainable conservation and management norms for high seas fisheries. To achieve the intended goals of non-flag enforcement, we need to complete the participation and cooperation of groups which have been interested in high seas fisheries. However, considering the practice of high seas fisheries, especially the position of high seas fishery's nations, a substantial settlement of this system and the non-flag enforcement may take time.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 편의치적제도 활용방안 연구, "강종희", 한국해양수산개발원, 17~ (2001)
  2. 유엔해양법협약 이후 새로운 공해어업질서의 법적 성격 연구, "김선표", 한국해양수산개발원, 12~ (2000)
  3. 불법·비보고·비규제(IUU)어업 근절을 위한 국제행동계획과 국내 이행방안 연구, "김선표", 한국해양수산개발원, 4~ (2001)
  4. 이상고, "해양환경어업론", pp.27~ (1999), 아르케
  5. 이병조, "국제법신강", pp.524~ (1995), 일조각
  6. 이윤철, "해사법규", pp.35~37 (2005), 다솜출판사
  7. 최종화, "현대 국제해양법", pp.32~ (2004), 도서출판 두남
  8. 한국수산회, "수산연감", pp.188~189 (2009)
  9. 해양수산부, "신국제어업질서 구축에 따른 국제어업협력방안", pp.253~254 (2000)
  10. 백진현, "유엔해양법협약 체제의 평가와 전망: 제도적 발전을 중심으로", 국제법학회논총, 50(3), pp.123~144 (2005), 대한국제법학회
  11. 주동금, "선박의 국적과 편의치적 문제", 국제법학회논총, 38(2), pp.268~ (1993), 대한국제법학회
  12. 최종화, "공해조업선에 대한 비선적국의 집행권 행사제도", 해사법연구, 22(1), pp.1~24 (2010), 한국해사법학회
  13. 최종화, "국제수산기구 자원보존관리조치의 국내법적 수용체계", 해사법연구, 18(2), pp.1~26 (2006), 한국해사법학회
  14. 최종화, "공해조업선에 대한 관할권 문제와 기국의 책임", 국제법학회논총, 39(1), pp.183~ (1994), 대한국제법학회
  15. 최종화, "공해조업선에 대한 비선적국의 집행권 행사제도", 해사법연구, 22(1), pp.1~24 (2010), 한국해사법학회
  16. Black's Law Dictionary, "(Centennial Edition(1891-1991))", pp.1306~ (1990)
  17. Gerald Moore, "The FAO Compliance Agreement" (2000), Myron H. Norquest and John
  18. Norton Moore, "Current Fisheries Issues and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations", pp.78~, The hague
  19. Rosemary Rayfuse, "The interrelationship between the global instruments of international fisheries Law. in: Development in International Fisheries Law", pp.111~ (1999), Kluwer Law International

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)