중세 전ㆍ후기 자료에 나타나는추량조동사 「む」의 특징
The characteristics of auxiliary verb "Mu"in the early and end of the Middle Age
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is a study of the characteristics of the writing system and the meaningof "Mu" "N" "U" "You" The following is the results. First, the characteristics of the writing system is that "Mu" "N" was both usedin the early Middle Age. "N" "U" were both used at end of the Middle Age. Atthe end of Middle Age, the frequency of use of "Mu" decreased sharply and thefrequency of use of "N" decreased. However, the frequency of use of "U" increased. The way of writing them is different by the individuals writing them. The reasonthat use of "Mu" decreased sharply is that the writing system changed over from"Mu" to "N". The lot of use of "U" in the Colloquial Sources At the end of MiddleAge shows that "U" has Colloquial writing system compared to "N". Compared tothe use of "N"and "U", "N" was found mainly in the written sources like forewordor WAKA, U" was used a lot in the Colloquial sources. Second, as a characteristic of the meaning, that expression of <willㆍdeterminationㆍdesire>-<postulatedㆍperiphrastic>-<Inferenceㆍexpectation>-<invitationㆍexpectationㆍimperative> distributed in the early Middle Age. At the end of MiddleAge the expressions of <willㆍdeterminationㆍdesire>-<Inferenceㆍexpectation>-<postulatedㆍperiphrastic>-<invitationㆍexpectationㆍimperative> distributed. Itshows that the early Middle Age has different use from the end of Middle Age. However, expressions of <willㆍdeterminationㆍdesire> is used most during thesame period and it shows that The main meaning of "Mu" is <willㆍdeterminationㆍdesire>. The meaning does not change, though the writing system changed from"Mu" to "U" "You". The remarkable characteristic at the end of Middle Age is that the expressionsof <postulatedㆍperiphrastic> had been decreasing. The reason that the expressionsof <postulatedㆍperiphrastic> decreased is that adnominal form decreased and,function of <postulatedㆍperiphrastic> itself decreased.
Abstract
This paper is a study of the characteristics of the writing system and the meaningof "Mu" "N" "U" "You" The following is the results. First, the characteristics of the writing system is that "Mu" "N" was both usedin the early Middle Age. "N" "U" were both used at end of the Middle Age. Atthe end of Middle Age, the frequency of use of "Mu" decreased sharply and thefrequency of use of "N" decreased. However, the frequency of use of "U" increased. The way of writing them is different by the individuals writing them. The reasonthat use of "Mu" decreased sharply is that the writing system changed over from"Mu" to "N". The lot of use of "U" in the Colloquial Sources At the end of MiddleAge shows that "U" has Colloquial writing system compared to "N". Compared tothe use of "N"and "U", "N" was found mainly in the written sources like forewordor WAKA, U" was used a lot in the Colloquial sources. Second, as a characteristic of the meaning, that expression of <willㆍdeterminationㆍdesire>-<postulatedㆍperiphrastic>-<Inferenceㆍexpectation>-<invitationㆍexpectationㆍimperative> distributed in the early Middle Age. At the end of MiddleAge the expressions of <willㆍdeterminationㆍdesire>-<Inferenceㆍexpectation>-<postulatedㆍperiphrastic>-<invitationㆍexpectationㆍimperative> distributed. Itshows that the early Middle Age has different use from the end of Middle Age. However, expressions of <willㆍdeterminationㆍdesire> is used most during thesame period and it shows that The main meaning of "Mu" is <willㆍdeterminationㆍdesire>. The meaning does not change, though the writing system changed from"Mu" to "U" "You". The remarkable characteristic at the end of Middle Age is that the expressionsof <postulatedㆍperiphrastic> had been decreasing. The reason that the expressionsof <postulatedㆍperiphrastic> decreased is that adnominal form decreased and,function of <postulatedㆍperiphrastic> itself decreased.
참고문헌 (16)
- 한미경, "일본어 고전문법", pp.87~ (2004), 태학사
- 이수향, "중세전기에 나타나는 추량조동사「む」의 사용양상", 日本文化研究, 46, pp.479~502 (2013), 동아시아일본학회
- 이수향, "推量の助動詞「ん」から「う」への表記移行に関する考察", 일본언어문화, (19), pp.299~316 (2011), 한국일본언어문화학회
- 池上秋彦, "古文における推量(むㆍらむㆍけむ)の助動詞, In 国文法講座2古文解釈と文法ー活用語", pp.310~352 (1987), 明治書院
- 池上秋彦, "国語史から見た近代語", pp.498~546 (1996), 東苑社
- 江口正弘, "天草版平家物語の語彙と語法", pp.201~202 (1994), 笠間書院
- 沖森卓也, "日本語史", pp.129~ (1989), おうふう社
- 桑原博史, "国語史資料集ー図録と解説", pp.110~ (1976), 武蔵野書院
- 此島正年, "国語助動詞の研究", pp.262~282 (1973), 桜楓社
- 桜井光昭, "推量の助動詞, In 品詞別日本文法講座 助動詞Ⅰ", pp.203~209 (1972), 明治書院
- 田中章夫, "近代語成立過程にみられるいわゆる分析的傾向について", 近代語研究, 1, pp.13~26 (1965), 武蔵野書院
- 土井忠生, "新訂 国語史要説", pp.81~ (1981), 修文舘
- 時枝誠記, "古典の解釈文法", pp.245~251 (1953), 至文堂
- 時枝誠記, "日本文法 文語篇" (1954), 岩波書店
- 橋本進吉, "助詞ㆍ助動詞の研究", pp.392~ (1969), 岩波書店
- 吉田金彦, "助動詞の変遷, In 品詞別日本文法講座 助動詞Ⅰ", pp.56~59 (1972), 明治書院
