본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

日韓語の友人同士の会話における 不同意・否定的評価の対象 -ポライトネス理論の観点から-

Objects of Disagreements and Negative assessments in Korean and Japanese conversation between friends -From the perspectives of politeness-

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze objects of utterances which include expressions of disagreements and negative assessments found in Korean and Japanese conversation between friends. I have found the following similarities and differences between Korean conversations and Japanese conversations: A)The result showed that “thought” is most likely to be subject to disagreements and negative assessments in both Korean and Japanese conversations between friends. B)In Japanese conversations, when the other participants talk about past experiences, their “accomplishment”, “talent”, “behavior” are likely to be subject to disagreements and negative assessments and these utterances are recognized as jokes such as “tsukkomi”. C)Korean conversations have higher proportion of “behavior” and “personality”, in case of “behavior”, qualitative differences were found. In Korean conversations, behaviors which directly affect speakers tend to be the objects of disagreements and negative assessments. Also the essential matters which stepping into other’s personal space such as “personality” are more likely to be subjects to disagreements and negative assessments. These results have led to the suggestion that there is a difference in the degree of FTA tolerance between Korean conversations and Japanese conversations.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze objects of utterances which include expressions of disagreements and negative assessments found in Korean and Japanese conversation between friends. I have found the following similarities and differences between Korean conversations and Japanese conversations: A)The result showed that “thought” is most likely to be subject to disagreements and negative assessments in both Korean and Japanese conversations between friends. B)In Japanese conversations, when the other participants talk about past experiences, their “accomplishment”, “talent”, “behavior” are likely to be subject to disagreements and negative assessments and these utterances are recognized as jokes such as “tsukkomi”. C)Korean conversations have higher proportion of “behavior” and “personality”, in case of “behavior”, qualitative differences were found. In Korean conversations, behaviors which directly affect speakers tend to be the objects of disagreements and negative assessments. Also the essential matters which stepping into other’s personal space such as “personality” are more likely to be subjects to disagreements and negative assessments. These results have led to the suggestion that there is a difference in the degree of FTA tolerance between Korean conversations and Japanese conversations.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 장윤아, "한일 양국인의 대화에 나타나는 농담 프레임과 문맥화 단서: 부동의와 부정적 평가 발화를 중심으로", 사회언어학, 25(4), pp.119~141 (2017), 한국사회언어학회[DOI]
  2. 今田恵美, "対人関係構築プロセスの会話分析" (2015), 大阪大学出版会
  3. 林始恩, "親和的関係における否定的評価の研究-日韓母語話者の言語行動の比較-", 博士, pp.2015
  4. 임시은, "非難の表現形式 -疑問文を中心に-", 일어일문학연구, 91(1), pp.391~413 (2014), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
  5. 大津友美, "親しい友人同士の会話におけるポジティブ・ポライトネス-「「遊びとしての対立行動に注目して-", 社会言語科学, 6(2), pp.44~53 (2004)
  6. 金庚芬, "会話に見られる「ほめ」の対象に関する日韓対照研究", 日本語教育, 124, pp.13~22 (2005)
  7. 小矢野哲夫, "大阪的談話の特徴-ボケとツッコミ-", 日本語学, 23(11), pp.45~52 (2004)
  8. 関崎博紀, "日本人大学生同士の雑談に見あられる否定的評価の言語的表現方法に関する考察", 日本語教育, 115, pp.111~125 (2013)
  9. 関崎博紀, "日本語の自然会話における悪態の対象", 国際日本研究, 1, pp.71~93 (2009), 筑波大学人文社会科学研究科国際日本研究専攻
  10. 椙本総子, "提案に対する反対の伝え方-親しい友人同士の会話データをもとにして-", 日本語学, 23(8), pp.22~33 (2004)
  11. 張允娥, "日韓同性間の会話における不同意・否定的評価の相互行為-ジェンダーとポライトネスの観点からみる対立と冗談-", 阪大日本語研究, 29, pp.101~127 (2017), 阪大学大学院文学研究科日本語学講座
  12. 水鳥梨秒, "発話の連関における類似批判的コメントの機能と伝達について―"つっこみ"と呼ばれる言語現象とその相互作用", 国際広報メディアジャーナル, 2, pp.53~72 (2004), 北海道大学大学院国際広メディア研究科
  13. 박승원, "韓人日本語習者の不表明行の特非言語行動を含む不の表し方を中心に", Foreign Languages Education, 14(3), pp.367~383 (2007), 한국외국어교육학회
  14. Brown, P., "Politeness: Some universals in language use" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  15. Leech, G., "Principle of pragmatics" (1983), Longman
  16. Levinson, S. C., "Pragmatics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
  17. Schegloff, E. A., "Opening up closings", Semiotica, 7, pp.289~327 (1973)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)