본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어 논술문에서의 성별의 차이:통사적 복잡성의 분석

Gender differences in L2 argumentative writing: An analysis of syntactic complexity.

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study aimed to examine whether there are any gender differences in linguistic ability when comparing Korean males’ and females’ English writings regarding measures of syntactic complexity. For the purpose of the study, the Yonsei English learner Corpus was used as data and L2 Syntactical Complex Analyzer as a tool for analyzing the level of syntactic complexity. The results of the study demonstrated three different outcomes. First, when comparing two gender groups, regardless of English proficiency, the level of syntactic complexity was very similar in general. Secondly, when comparing groups of the same proficiency between the two genders, only beginner and intermediate groups demonstrated a significant difference in the level of syntactic complexity. On the other hand, there was no significant gender difference in the high-intermediate and advanced groups. For the high-intermediate and advanced groups, gender as a variable does not directly affect the syntactic development. Lastly, when comparing groups within the same gender, there was a trend showing linear progression of the level of syntactic complexity.

Abstract

This study aimed to examine whether there are any gender differences in linguistic ability when comparing Korean males’ and females’ English writings regarding measures of syntactic complexity. For the purpose of the study, the Yonsei English learner Corpus was used as data and L2 Syntactical Complex Analyzer as a tool for analyzing the level of syntactic complexity. The results of the study demonstrated three different outcomes. First, when comparing two gender groups, regardless of English proficiency, the level of syntactic complexity was very similar in general. Secondly, when comparing groups of the same proficiency between the two genders, only beginner and intermediate groups demonstrated a significant difference in the level of syntactic complexity. On the other hand, there was no significant gender difference in the high-intermediate and advanced groups. For the high-intermediate and advanced groups, gender as a variable does not directly affect the syntactic development. Lastly, when comparing groups within the same gender, there was a trend showing linear progression of the level of syntactic complexity.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 이석재, "한국 예비 대학생의 영어 사용 특성 파악을 위한 대규모 공개 영어 학습자 코퍼스 구축 및 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 14(11), pp.1019~1029 (2014), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  2. 최재웅, "대학생 영어 학습자 작문 코퍼스에 대한 주제별 분류: 계층적 군집화", 언어정보, (17), pp.93~115 (2013), 언어정보연구소
  3. Cooper, T. C., "Measuring written syntactic patterns of second language learners of German", The Journal of Educational Research, 69(5), pp.176~183 (1976)
  4. Cornett, H. E., "Gender differences in syntactic development among English speaking adolescents", Student Pulse, 6(3) (2014)
  5. Eriksson, M., "Differences between girls and boys in emerging language skills : Evidence from 10 language communities", British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(2), pp.326~343 (2012)
  6. Ellis, R., "Understanding second language acquisition." (2015), Oxford University Press
  7. Ellis, R., "The effects of planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in second language narrative writing", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), pp.59~84 (2004)
  8. "Gender: The key to substantiality and food security. SD Dimensions" (2015)[URL]
  9. Foster, P., "The influence of planning and task type on second language performance", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, pp.299~323 (1996)
  10. Gyllgard, L., "Gender differences in Swedish students’ written English and students’ identification of female and male language features" (2006), Karlstads University
  11. Hampson, E., "Behavioral endocrinology", pp.357~398 (1992), MIT Press
  12. Hills, M., "You are what you type: Language and gender deception on the Internet", 석사, pp.2000
  13. Grammatical structures written at three grade levels, "Hunt, K. W.", IL: National Council of Teachers of English, ~, pp.Research Report No. 3 (1965)
  14. 황은경, "Korean EFL Learners’ Language Development across Proficiency Levels in Written Productions", 영어교육, 67(3), pp.27~50 (2012), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  15. 황은경, "Syntactic Complexity of Korean EFL Learners’ Argumentative Writing", 현대영어교육, 14(2), pp.123~143 (2013), 현대영어교육학회
  16. Joseph, R., "The evolution of sex differences in language, sexuality, and visual-spatial skills", Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 29, pp.35~66 (2000)
  17. 강동호, "Gender Role and Motivation on Dictogloss", 영어교과교육, 8(1), pp.81~101 (2009), 한국영어교과교육학회
  18. 김정연, "Roles of gender in the relationship between EFL learners’ perceptions of the context and their speaking achievement", 영어교과교육, 13(4), pp.55~76 (2014), 한국영어교과교육학회
  19. Kim, S., "Gender-based differences in learner English.", 석사, pp.2012
  20. Lakoff, R., "Language and woman’s place", Language in Society, 2(1), pp.45~80 (1973)
  21. Larsen-Freeman, D., "The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English", Applied Linguistics, 27(4), pp.590~619 (2006)
  22. Lu, X., "Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), pp.474~496 (2010)
  23. Lu, X., "A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development", TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), pp.36~62 (2011)
  24. Nippold, M. A., "Peer conflict explanations in child, adolescents, and adults : Examining the development of complex syntax", American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, pp.179~188 (2007)
  25. Norman, G., "Likert scales, levels of measurement and the ‘laws’ of statistics", Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), pp.625~632 (2010)
  26. Ortega, L., "Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2proficiency : A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing", Applied Linguistics, 24, pp.492~518 (2003)
  27. Pienemann, M., "Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory", pp.1~60 (2005), John Benjamins
  28. Pienemann, M., "Studying processability theory", pp.50~63 (2011), John Benjamins
  29. Selinker, L., "Interlanguage", International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), pp.201~231 (1972)
  30. Shirzad, F., "Gender differences in EFL academic writing", International Journal of Academic Research, 5(4), pp.79~87 (2013)
  31. Snow, C., "The critical age for language acquisition : Evidence from second language learning", Child Development, 49, pp.1114~1128 (1978)
  32. Subon, F., "Gender differences in the use of linguistic forms in the speech of men and women in the Malaysian context", Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 13(3), pp.67~79 (2013)
  33. Sunderland, J., "Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language", Language Teaching, 33(4), pp.203~223 (2000)
  34. Tse, S. K., "Sex differences in syntactic development : Evidence from Cantonese-speaking preschoolers in Hong Kong", International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(6), pp.509~517 (2002)
  35. Vaezi, S., "Learner characteristics and syntactic and lexical complexity of written products", International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), pp.671~687 (2012)
  36. Waskita, D., "Differences in men’s and women’s ESL academic writing at the University of Melbourne", Journal Sosioteknologi, 14, pp.448~463 (2008)
  37. Wolfe-Quintero, K., "Second language development in writing : Measures of fluency, accuracy & complexity" (1998), University of Hawaii Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)