본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Fluency and Syntactic Complexity in Korean EFL Learners’ Written English

2

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The purposes of this study were to examine (1) the effect of two different modes of discourse,i.e., narrative and argument, on the level of writing performance, fluency, and syntactic complexity of compositions written by Korean EFL university students; (2) whether the level of writing proficiency affects fluency and syntactic complexity of compositions written in each mode. The writing samples were collected from seventy-eight Korean university students, rated using a holistic rubric, and then divided into three groups of writing proficiency. Four fluency variables (TW, total number of words; MLS, mean length of sentence; MLT, mean length of T-unit; MLC, mean length of clause) and three syntactic complexity variables (T/S, sentence coordination ratio; C/T, T-unit complexity ratio; DC/C, dependent clause ratio) were analyzed and compared across two discourse modes and three proficiency levels. The results indicated that mode of discourse has a significant influence on the ratings of writing performance, MLS,MLT, C/T, and DC/C. The analysis revealed statistically significant correlations in both discourse modes between the level of writing and the following six variables: TW, MLS, MLT,MLC, C/T, and DC/C. Implications for L2 writing instruction and assessment are discussed.

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to examine (1) the effect of two different modes of discourse,i.e., narrative and argument, on the level of writing performance, fluency, and syntactic complexity of compositions written by Korean EFL university students; (2) whether the level of writing proficiency affects fluency and syntactic complexity of compositions written in each mode. The writing samples were collected from seventy-eight Korean university students, rated using a holistic rubric, and then divided into three groups of writing proficiency. Four fluency variables (TW, total number of words; MLS, mean length of sentence; MLT, mean length of T-unit; MLC, mean length of clause) and three syntactic complexity variables (T/S, sentence coordination ratio; C/T, T-unit complexity ratio; DC/C, dependent clause ratio) were analyzed and compared across two discourse modes and three proficiency levels. The results indicated that mode of discourse has a significant influence on the ratings of writing performance, MLS,MLT, C/T, and DC/C. The analysis revealed statistically significant correlations in both discourse modes between the level of writing and the following six variables: TW, MLS, MLT,MLC, C/T, and DC/C. Implications for L2 writing instruction and assessment are discussed.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Akef, K., "A model for developing rating scale descriptors: Assessing EFL writing process" (2012), Lambert Academic Publishing
  2. Anakasiri, S., "Indicators of quality in second language written communication", 박사, pp.1986
  3. Bain, A., "English composition and rhetoric" (1867), D. Appleton and Company
  4. Braddock, R., "Research in written composition" (1963), National Council of Teachers of English
  5. Relationship of admission test scores to writing performance of native and nonnative speakers of English, "Carlson, S.", ETS, ~, pp.TOEFL Research Report 19: ETS Research Report (1985)
  6. Carrell, P. L., "Reading and writing descriptive and persuasive texts", The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), pp.314~324 (1991)
  7. Chenoweth, N. A., "Fluency in writing. Generating text in L1 and L2", Written Communication, 18(1), pp.80~98 (2001)
  8. Choi, I. C., "Construct validation of English simulated oral proficiency interview test method facets", Journal of the Applied Linguistics Association of Korea, 16(1), pp.215~246 (2000)
  9. Collins, J. L., "Strategies for struggling writers" (1998), The Guilford Press
  10. Crowhurst, M., "Teaching and learning the writing of persuasive", argumentative discourse, 1990, pp.15(4), 348~359
  11. Crowhurst, M., "Audience and mode of discourse effects on syntactic complexity in writing two grade levels", Research in the Teaching of English, 13, pp.101~109 (1979)
  12. Cumming, A., "Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL", Assessing Writing, 10(1), pp.5~43 (2005)
  13. Engber, C. A., "The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(2), pp.139~155 (1995)
  14. Engelhard, Jr. G., "The influences of mode of discourse, experiential demand, and gender on the quality of student writing", Research in the Teaching of English, 26, pp.315~335 (1992)
  15. Ferris, D. R., "Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at different levels of L2 proficiency", TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), pp.414~420 (1994)
  16. Freedman, A., "Writing in the college years : Some indices of growth", College Composition and Communication, 31, pp.311~324 (1984)
  17. Investigating source use, discourse features, and process in integrated writing tests, "Gebril, A.", 47~84, pp.Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second Language Assessment, 7 (2009)
  18. Grobe, C., "Syntactic maturity, mechanics, and vocabulary as predictors of quality ratings", Research in the Teaching of English, 15, pp.75~85 (1981)
  19. Hamp-Lyons, L., "Examining expert judgments of task difficultyon essay tests. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 49-68. Early L2 writing development : A study of autobiographical essays by university-level students of Russian", The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), pp.309~326 (1994)
  20. Hinkel, E., "The effects of essay topics on modal verb uses in L1 and L2 academic writing", Journal of Pragmatics, 41, pp.667~683 (2009)
  21. "Personal narrative collection" (2012)[URL]
  22. Grammatical structures written at three grade levels, "Hunt, K. W.", National Council of Teachers of English, ~, pp.Research Report No. 3 (1965)
  23. Hunt, K. W., "Do sentences in the second language grow like those in the first?", TESOL Quarterly, 4(3), pp.195~202 (1970)
  24. Ishikawa, S., "Objective measurement of low-proficiency EFL narrative writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(1), pp.51~70 (1995)
  25. Kameen, P., "Syntactic skill and ESL writing quality, In On TESOL ’79", pp.343~350 (1979), TESOL
  26. Kegley, P. H., "The effect of mode of discourse on student writing performance : Implications for policy", Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 8, pp.147~154 (1986)
  27. Larsen-Freeman, D., "An ESL index of development", TESOL Quarterly, 12(4), pp.439~447 (1978)
  28. Nold, E. W., "An analysis of readers' response to essays", Research in the Teaching of English, 11, pp.164~174 (1977)
  29. Ortega, L., "Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency : A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing", Applied Linguistics, 24(4), pp.492~518 (2003)
  30. Perron, J. D., "Written syntactic complexity and the modes of discourse", Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (1977)
  31. Polio, C. G., "Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research", Language Learning, 47(1), pp.101~143 (1997)
  32. Pollitt, A., "Calibrating graded assessments : Rasch Partial Credit Analysis of performance in writing", Language Testing, 4(1), pp.72~92 (1987)
  33. Quellmalz, E. S., "Effects of discourse and response mode on the measurement of writing competence", Journal of Educational Measurement, 19, pp.241~258 (1982)
  34. Rashid, S., "ESL writing variability : Writing tasks, gender and proficiency level", Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(2), pp.227~243 (2007)
  35. Reid, J., "Responding to different topic types: A quantitative analysis of contrastive rhetoric perspective, In Second language writing", pp.191~210 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  36. Reid, S., "Writer’s workbench analysis of holistically scored essays", Computers and Composition, 3(2), pp.6~32 (1986)
  37. Robinson, L. K., "Best practices in curriculum-based evaluation and written expression, In Best practices in school psychology V", pp.439~452 (2008), National Association of School Psychologists
  38. Rosen, H., "An investigation of the effects of differentiated writing assignments on the performance in English composition of a selected group of 15", 16-year-old pupils, University of London, 1969
  39. San Jose, C. P. M., "Grammatical structures in four modes of writing at fourth grade level", 박사, pp.1972
  40. Smith, C. S., "Discourse modes : aspectual entities and tense interpretation", Cahiers de Grammaire, 26, pp.183~206 (2001)
  41. Weigle, S. C., "Assessing writing" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  42. Wiseman, C. S., "Rater decision-making behaviors in measuring second language writing ability using holistic and analytic scoring methods", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics (2009)
  43. Witte, S. P., "Evaluating college writing programs" (1983), Southern Illinois University Press
  44. Wolfe-Quintero, K., "Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity" (1998), University of Hawaii Press
  45. Yau, M., "The influence of mode on the syntactic complexity of EFL students at three grade levels", TESL Canada Journal, 2(1), pp.65~76 (1984)
  46. Watanabe, Y., "Read-to-write tasks for assessment of second language academic writing skills:Investigating text features and rater reactions", 박사, pp.2001
  47. Weigle, S. C., "Assessing writing" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  48. White, E. M., "Some issues in the testing of writing", Notes from the National Testing Network in Writin, 17~ (1982)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)