본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

'ないでおくれ'의 사용 실태 및 표현가치

The usage and grammatical significance of “Naide-Okure”

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

.

Abstract

This paper focuses on the extracted illustrations of linguistic materials which <Naide-Okure> appears, then classified into linguistic・situational・contextual conditions and examined the usage and the grammatical significance of the illustrations. To examine the usages of <Naide-Okure>, in <Intimate relationship>, it was unable to find the examples of <Naide-Okure> being used, where the cases were [male speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific higher seniority)・[male speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific equal or higher seniority)・[male speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific equal or lower seniority)・[male speaker/female listener](the listener is in honorific higher seniority)・[male speaker/female listener](the listener is in honorific equal or higher seniority)・[male speaker/female listener](the listener and the speaker are in honorific equal seniorities) and [female speaker/male listener](the listener and the speaker are in honorific equal seniorities)・[female speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific equal or lower seniority)・[female speaker/female listener](the listener is in honorific higher seniority)・[female speaker/female listener](the listener is in honorific equal or higher seniority)・[female speaker/female listener](the listener and the speaker are in honorific equal seniorities)・[female speaker/female listener](the listener is in honorific equal or lower seniority). In <Estranged relationship>, it was unable to find the examples of <Naide- Okure> being used, where the cases were [male speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific higher seniority)・[male speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific equal or higher seniority)・[male speaker/male listener](the listener and the speaker are in honorific equal seniorities)・[male speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific equal or lower seniority)・[male speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific lower seniority)・[male speaker/female listener](the listener is in honorific higher seniority)・[male speaker/female listener](the listener is in honorific equal or lower seniority)・[male speaker/female listener](the listener is in honorific equal or lower seniority)・[male speaker/female listener](the listener is in honorific lower seniority) and [female speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific higher seniority)・[female speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific equal or higher seniority)・[female speaker/female listener](the listener is in honorific higher seniority)・[female speaker/female listener](the listener is in honorific equal or higher seniority)・[female speaker/female listener](the listener and the speaker are in honorific equal seniorities)・[female speaker/female listener](the listener is in honorific equal or lower seniority). To examine the grammatical significance of <Naide-Okure>, in linguistic・contextual・situational condition where the speaker and the listener’s degree of intimacy is defined as an <Intimate relationship>, is followed. The expression presents [request][entreaty] where the cases are (1)[male speaker/male listener](the listener and the speaker are in honorific equal seniorities)・(2)(3)[male speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific lower seniority)・(5)[male speaker/female listener] (the listener is in honorific equal or lower seniority)・(6)(7)[male speaker/female listener](the listener is in honorific lower seniority)・(12)[female speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific lower seniority)・(14)[female speaker/female listener](the listener is in honorific lower seniority). And the expression presents [solicitation] where the cases are (8)[female speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific higher seniority)・(9)[female speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific equal or higher seniority). The condition where the speaker and the listener’s degree of intimacy is defined as <Estranged relationship>, the expression presents [unpleasantness] where the cases are (4)[male speaker/female listener](the listener and the speaker are in honorific equal seniorities)・(10)[female speaker/male listener](the listener and the speaker are in honorific equal seniorities)・(11)[female speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific equal or lower seniority)・(13)[female speaker/male listener](the listener is in honorific lower seniority)・(15)[female speaker/female listener](the listener is in honorific lower seniority).

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 이성규, "日本語 依賴表現 硏究의 課題", 일본학보, 0(70), pp.111~124 (2007), 한국일본학회
  2. 이성규, "<お/ご~くださる> 계열의 서열화 및 사용가능성에 대해", 일본학보, 0(71), pp.93~110 (2007), 한국일본학회
  3. 李成圭, "일본어 의뢰표현Ⅰ - 肯定의 依賴表現의 諸相 -", pp.16~117 (2007), 시간의물레
  4. 이성규, "일본어 의뢰표현의 유형화 및 서열화에 대해 ― <てくれる>계열·<てもらえる>계열을 대상으로 하여 ―", 일본학보, (74), pp.17~34 (2008), 한국일본학회
  5. 이성규, "의뢰표현 <てくださるか>에 관한 재론", 일본학보, (76), pp.97~115 (2008), 한국일본학회
  6. 이성규, "의뢰표현 <てくださらないか>에 관한 재론 - 시대물을 대상으로 하여 -", 일본학보, (77), pp.45~56 (2008), 한국일본학회
  7. 이성규, "의뢰표현 <てくださらないか>에 관한 재론― 현대물을 대상으로 하여 -―", 일본학보, (79), pp.87~100 (2009), 한국일본학회
  8. 이성규, "<ないでもらえる>계열의 의뢰표현― 각 형식의 사용실태 및 표현가치(정중도)를 중심으로 하여 ―", 일본학보, (92), pp.63~83 (2012), 한국일본학회[DOI]
  9. 이성규, "의뢰표현 <ないでくださいますか>의 표현가치", 외국학연구, (23), pp.121~138 (2013), 외국학연구소
  10. 이성규, "<ないでくださる?><ないでくださらない?>の依頼表現 ― 使用実態および使用可能性、そして表現価値 ―", 일본학보, (95), pp.47~61 (2013), 한국일본학회
  11. 이성규, "의뢰표현 <ないでくださいませんか>의 운용 실태와 표현가치", 외국학연구, (27), pp.237~257 (2014), 외국학연구소
  12. 이성규, "<ないでくださるでしょうか>의 의뢰표현 - 사용 가능성 및 표현가치 -", 일본학보, (99), pp.137~150 (2014), 한국일본학회
  13. 이성규, "<ないでくださらないでしょうか>의 사용 가능성 및 표현가치–남성 화자를 중심으로 하여–", 일본연구, (60), pp.459~484 (2014), 일본연구소
  14. 이성규, "<ないでくださいます?>의 사용 가능성 및 표현가치 ― 여성 화자를 중심으로 하여 ―", 日本語敎育, (68), pp.17~38 (2014), 한국일본어교육학회
  15. 이성규, "<ないでくださいません?>의 사용 가능성 및 표현가치 - 화자 불명을 중심으로 -", 비교일본학, 30, pp.263~290 (2014), 일본학국제비교연구소
  16. 이성규, "<ないでくださいませんでしょうか>의 사용 가능성 및 표현가치 - 남성 화자를 중심으로 하여 -", 일본연구, (22), pp.227~262 (2014), 글로벌일본연구원
  17. 이성규, "<ないでくださいますでしょうか>의 표현가치 - 여성 화자를 중심으로 하여 -", 외국학연구, (29), pp.277~302 (2014), 외국학연구소
  18. 이성규, "의뢰표현 <ないでいただけませんか>의 사용 가능성 및 표현가치 - 남성 화자를 중심으로 -", 외국학연구, (32), pp.153~182 (2015), 외국학연구소[DOI]
  19. 李成圭, "現代日本語敬語の研究", pp.70~82 (1999), 不二文化社
  20. 李成圭, "일본어 경어의 제문제", pp.31~50 (2006), 不二文化
  21. 林八龍, "분야별 현대 일본어학 연구 5장", pp.281~299 (2014), 도서출판 박이정
  22. 일본어교육 1(문법), "일본어학", pp.2013, 韓美卿
  23. 工藤真由美, "依頼表現の発達", 国語と国文学, 56(1), pp.46~63 (1979)
  24. 久野暲, "新日本文法研究", pp.95~108 (1983), 大修館書店
  25. 坂田幸子, "教師用日本語教育ハンドブック④ 文法(ぶんぽう) Ⅱ", pp.147~149 (1980), 国際交流基金 凡人社
  26. 仁田義雄, "日本語のモダリティと人称", pp.232~236 (1991), ひつじ書房
  27. 日本語教育学会, "日本語教育事典", pp.197~198 (1982), 大修館書店
  28. 日本語教育学会, "新版 日本語教育事典", pp.463~464 (2005), 大修館書店
  29. 庭三郎, "『現代日本語文法概説』(net版)", ~ (2004)
  30. "敬語の指針" (2007)[URL]
  31. 吉川武時, "日本語文法入門", pp.143~144 (1989), アルク

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)