본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘에밀레종’ 전설의 일본어 번역과 식민지시기 희곡의 정치성 -함세덕의 희곡 「어밀레종」을 중심으로-

A study on Japanese translation of “the Emile Bell” legend and “Emile Bell” by Ham-sedeok

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

.

Abstract

The goal of this study is to analyze the records of the legend of the Emile Bell, elucidating the influence of the colonial Japanese translations on the Korean records of the legend. The very first records of the legend are the English translations by missionaries. However, these poems or short introductory texts do not specify the temporal or spatial background of the story and focus only on the motif of sacrificing a child in the process of forging a bell. They lack explicit description of the characters and narrative structure, also not showing any relation to the Bell of Bongdeoksa. Only after the 1920’s, when the legend was documented by the Japanese, the records began to convey clear portrayal of the characters, structured narratives and the link to the Bell of Bongdeoksa. Hamaguchi’s “Play Daughter Sacrifice Story” was the first to establish the motifs of “the Emile Bell” legend by explicitly depicting the characters and showing a concrete narrative. Nakamura’s “The Bell of Bongdeoksa” represented the story in connection with the Bell of Bongdeoksa for the first time. Osaka’s record first mentions a woman who voluntarily gives her child as a temple offering. Those records by the Japanese influenced the records by Korean researchers after the 1930’s. The texts feature a range of representations of women, classified into slip-resistance, slip-conformity and voluntary-offering types. The representations of slip-resistance type later developed into the image of women criticizing the Japanese Empire for mobilizing the people of Korea by force. Voluntary-offering type, in combination with slip-conformity motif in artist novels, developed into the image of women used for the propagation of the war ideology. In the light of the images of women discussed above, “the Emile bell” by Ham-sedeok can be seen as a criticism of the “mother of military nation” ideology. Despite the apparent pro-Japanese framework, his work shows how Ihwanyeo resists to the unjust authority that demands sacrifice of a child and thus points out the violent nature of the ideology forcing mothers to send their children to the battlefield.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Constance J. D. Coulson, "The Sights of Seoul", Korea, pp.59~ (1910)
  2. H. B. Hulbert, "The Korean Legend on the ‘Spirit of the Bell’", The Korea Review, pp.1~ (1901)
  3. 김재석, "함세덕 그가 걸었던 길", pp.10~ (2012), 역락
  4. 김효순, "조선전통문예 일본어번역의 정치성과 현진건의 『무영탑』에 나타난 민족의식 고찰", 일본언어문화, (32), pp.297~320 (2015), 한국일본언어문화학회
  5. 문명대, "한국불교미술사", pp.319~ (1997), 한언
  6. 박영정, "함세덕의 ‘어밀레종’에 관한 일고찰", 한국극예술연구, 2, pp.128~ (1992)
  7. 성낙주, "에밀레종傳說硏究史 批判", 동악어문학, 47, pp.153~ (2006)
  8. 성낙주, "‘에밀레종 傳說’의 政治學的 讀解", 한국문학연구, (31), pp.259~296 (2006), 한국문학연구소
  9. 孫晋泰, "朝鮮巫覡의神歌 (其二)", 靑丘學叢, 22, pp.199~ (1935), 靑丘學會
  10. 宋錫夏, "神話傳說의 新羅", 조광, 1(1), pp.312~ (1935)
  11. 이기홍, "朝鮮傳說集", pp.170~171 (1944), 朝鮮出版社
  12. 이지영, "‘에밀레종’ 전설과 그 소설적 변용연구", 冠嶽語文硏究, 16, pp.192~196 (1991), 서울대국문과
  13. 이정욱, "만주사변과 식민지 조선의 전쟁동원 : 조선인의 독행미담집 제1집", pp.137~ (2016), 도서출판 역락
  14. 일연, "삼국유사 2 흥법 탑상 의해 신주 감통 피은 효선", pp.141~ (2014), 고려대학교출판부
  15. 장혜전, "함세덕희곡선집", pp.377~ (1995), 시인사
  16. 조선헌병대사령부, "조선인 독행 미담집(朝鮮の人の篤行美談集) 제2집" (1933), 역락
  17. 하마구치 료코, "재조일본인이 본 조선인의 심상2-『조선 및 만주』의 조선문예물 번역집-", pp.179~ (2016), 역락
  18. 함세덕, "함세덕희곡선집", pp.49~ (1995), 시인사
  19. 황인덕, "에밀레종 전설의 근원과 전래", 어문연구, 56, pp.289~322 (2008), 어문연구학회
  20. 秋葉隆, "朝鮮の神話と傳說" (1943), 一杉書店
  21. 大坂六村, "慶州の傳說", pp.1~ (1927), 芦田書店
  22. 高裕燮, "朝鮮名人傳 2", pp.100~101 (1939), 朝鮮日報社
  23. 申來鉉, "朝鮮の神話と傳說" (1943), 一杉書店
  24. 中村亮平, "朝鮮童話集", pp.1~2 (1926), 富山房
  25. 中村亮平, "朝鮮慶州の美術", pp.1~ (1929), 芸艸堂

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)