본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

コウシタ類とコノヨウナ類の相違-文体と文章媒体に着目して-

Differences between the Koushita-Group and the Konoyouna-Group

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

In contemporary Japanese, the koushita-group and the konoyouna-group of demonstratives share a number of grammatical properties, but no serious analysis has be given to clarify the relation between these two groups. The aim of the present article is to reveal differences between the two groups in terms of style and the medium of style. Our analysis that focuses on style shows that the distinction between the plain form and the polite form has little effect on the differences between the two groups. According to the analysis relating to the medium of style, no significant difference in frequency between the two groups is observed in white papers, the Diet records, and books which are not restricted in terms of quantity such as newspaper and magazines. This finding suggests that the perspectives of “complexity and formality of discourse” and of “the extent to which a discourse is conceived of as a written language or spoken language” are not appropriate for explaining the difference between the two groups. On the other hand, the frequency of items belonging to the konoyouna-group is high in Chie Bukuro. This indicates that the occurrence of items belonging to the koushita-group is restricted when a discourse is relatively characterized as that of spoken language and the context and the relationship with the hearers or readers are formal. In this respect, it is suggested that the demonstratives of the koushita-group are particularly suited for formal discourse.

Abstract

In contemporary Japanese, the koushita-group and the konoyouna-group of demonstratives share a number of grammatical properties, but no serious analysis has be given to clarify the relation between these two groups. The aim of the present article is to reveal differences between the two groups in terms of style and the medium of style. Our analysis that focuses on style shows that the distinction between the plain form and the polite form has little effect on the differences between the two groups. According to the analysis relating to the medium of style, no significant difference in frequency between the two groups is observed in white papers, the Diet records, and books which are not restricted in terms of quantity such as newspaper and magazines. This finding suggests that the perspectives of “complexity and formality of discourse” and of “the extent to which a discourse is conceived of as a written language or spoken language” are not appropriate for explaining the difference between the two groups. On the other hand, the frequency of items belonging to the konoyouna-group is high in Chie Bukuro. This indicates that the occurrence of items belonging to the koushita-group is restricted when a discourse is relatively characterized as that of spoken language and the context and the relationship with the hearers or readers are formal. In this respect, it is suggested that the demonstratives of the koushita-group are particularly suited for formal discourse.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 岡崎友子, "日本語指示詞の歴史的研究", pp.1~321 (2010), ひつじ書房
  2. 柏野和佳子, "テキストの硬さと軟らかさの考察", 第1回コーパス日本語学ワークショップ予稿集, pp.131~138 (2012), 国立国語研究所
  3. 柏野和佳子, "書籍サンプルの文体を分類する", 国語研プロジェクトレビュー, 4(1), pp.43~53 (2013), 国立国語研究所
  4. 菊池誠治, "日本語の指示連体詞に関する研究", 博士, 日語日文学科, pp.2013
  5. 小磯花絵, "コーパスに基づく多様なジャンルの文体比較", 言語処理学会第15回年次大会発表論文集, pp.594~597 (2009), 言語処理学会
  6. 近 悠 美, "連体詞「こういう」「こうした」の使い分け", 日本文化學報, (63), pp.25~48 (2014), 한국일본문화학회[DOI]
  7. Sakaguchi Sayaka, "連体修飾形の指示表現にみられる相違 ─後続名詞句の特徴から-", 일어일문학연구, 97(1), pp.231~252 (2016), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
  8. Sakaguchi Sayaka, "連体修飾形指示表現にみられる例示指示と唯一指示", 일본언어문화, (36), pp.177~197 (2016), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
  9. 佐野大樹, "システミック文法に基づく書きことばの複雑さ測定", 言語処理学会第14回年次大会発表論文集, pp.1097~1100 (2008), 言語処理学会
  10. 宮内佐夜香, "接続助詞とジャンル別文体的特徴の関連について", 国立国語研究所論集, 3, pp.39~52 (2012), 国立国語研究所

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)