相対名詞の語彙的なアスペクトの関係 －韓国語の「전」と日本語の「前(マエ／ゼン)」をめぐって－
Lexical aspect relation of relative nouns -Focusing on “Jeon” in Korean and “Mae／Zen” in Japanese-
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper, based on synchronic and diachronic studies on systems of the temporal relational nouns in Korean and Japanese temporal relative clauses, describes and identifies correspondence of the systems of temporal relative nouns in terms of facts and observation. On this paper, corresponding relation and lexical association(on Chinese words/Haneo) of Koran “전” and Japanese “前(マエ／ゼン)” are classified as 4 types and considered. as a reviewing method, based on dictionaries published in Korea and Japan, all vocabularies are extracted and reviewed. Each heading vocabulary extracted from each dictionary for each type is described; ① beyond the standards, and “前･後” is lexically corresponding. ② beyond the standards, and “前” is lexically not corresponding. ③ beyond the standards, and “後” is lexically not corresponding. ④ “前”,which is beyond the temporal standards, means a temporal relational noun in the standards. As a result of consideration, temporal directional functions in Korean and Japanese temporal relative nouns do not coincide. In other words, when we think about when the generality inherent in each temporal relative noun is actually realized in language, we find that their specificity is part of the universality, not an exception, but a process of grammaticalization.
Abstract
This paper, based on synchronic and diachronic studies on systems of the temporal relational nouns in Korean and Japanese temporal relative clauses, describes and identifies correspondence of the systems of temporal relative nouns in terms of facts and observation. On this paper, corresponding relation and lexical association(on Chinese words/Haneo) of Koran “전” and Japanese “前(マエ／ゼン)” are classified as 4 types and considered. as a reviewing method, based on dictionaries published in Korea and Japan, all vocabularies are extracted and reviewed. Each heading vocabulary extracted from each dictionary for each type is described; ① beyond the standards, and “前･後” is lexically corresponding. ② beyond the standards, and “前” is lexically not corresponding. ③ beyond the standards, and “後” is lexically not corresponding. ④ “前”,which is beyond the temporal standards, means a temporal relational noun in the standards. As a result of consideration, temporal directional functions in Korean and Japanese temporal relative nouns do not coincide. In other words, when we think about when the generality inherent in each temporal relative noun is actually realized in language, we find that their specificity is part of the universality, not an exception, but a process of grammaticalization.
참고문헌 (30)
- 고광주, "국어의 능격성 연구" (2001), 월인
- 金庚洙, "연체수식절에 나타나는 動詞性名詞의 의미적 고찰ー韓·日對照의 觀點에서ー", 일본학보, (61), pp.33~42 (2004), 한국일본학회
- 김경수, "「漢語する」に対応する韓国語の漢語動詞の実態調査", 日本語敎育, (51), pp.39~56 (2010), 한국일본어교육학회
- 김경수, "「前に」 節과 「전에」 節의 再考", 일본학보, (112), pp.23~44 (2017), 한국일본학회
- 김경수, "어휘적 아스펙트에 대한 일고찰", 東亞歷史文化硏究, 10, pp.149~161 (2019), 東亞歷史文化學會
- 권재일, "현대국어의 ‘기’ 명사화 내포문 연구", 한글, 171(171), pp.45~63 (1981), 한글학회
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판사
- 심재기, "명사화의 의미 기능", 언어, pp.5~1 (1980)
- 안평호, "時間関係節に関する日本語教育において考慮すべき点 ―韓国語母語話者の場合を中心に―", 日本語敎育, (55), pp.105~116 (2011), 한국일본어교육학회
- 안평호, "「-MAE NI」節와 「-(기) 前(에)」節에 대한 대조연구", 일본학보, (92), pp.51~62 (2012), 한국일본학회[DOI]
- 안평호, "「～ないまえ(前)に」節과 「～기 전(前)에」節 - 한일대조를 중심으로 -", 일본연구, (17), pp.161~177 (2012), 글로벌일본연구원
- 이광호, "중세 국어 문법론" (1990), 학연사
- 이성화, "문법화의 이해" (1998), 한국문화사
- 장윤희(張允熙), "‘전(前)’의 內包文 構成의 文法史", 어문연구(語文硏究), 36(1), pp.85~104 (2008), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- 岩崎卓, "ノデ節･カラ節のテンスについて", 国語学, 179, pp.114~103 (1994), 日本語学会(旧国語学会)
- 岩崎卓, "マエ節･アト節内のル形･タ形について", 光華日本文学, 7(7), pp.15~29 (1999), 光華女子大学日本文学会
- 大和田栄, "接尾辞"~中"とその造語性", 東京成徳短期大学紀要, 30, pp.37~44 (1997), 東京成徳短期大学
- 奥津敬一郎, "生成日本文法論", pp.230~273 (1974), 大修館書店
- 柏野健次, "｢故障中｣の意味論－造語意識とアスペクト－", 大阪樟蔭女子大学論集, 16, pp.101~112 (1979)
- 梶原滉太郎, "近代漢語の変遷", 日本語学, 17(5), pp.23~28 (1998), 明治書院
- 河上誓作, "｢マエに｣の前の肯定と否定", 日本語･日本文化研究論集, 3, pp.1~36 (1986), 大阪大学文学部共同研究センター
- 北原保雄, "明鏡国語辞典" (2003), 大修館書店
- 金庚洙, "日韓漢語動詞に関する対照言語学的研究", 博士, pp.2009
- 小林英樹, "現代日本語の漢語名詞の研究", pp.31~35 (2004), ひつじ書房
- 塚本秀樹, "日本語と朝鮮語の対照研究Ⅳ(下)研究論文編", pp.197~200 (1997), くろしお出版
- 永田高志, "｢故障中｣の社会言語学, 文学･芸術･文化", 近畿大学文芸学部論集, 12(2), pp.39~53 (2001)
- 橋本修, "相対基準時節の緒タイプ", 国語学, 181, pp.15~29 (1995)
- 橋本修, "引用節の基準時", 文芸言語研究･言語編, 29, pp.25~39 (1996), 筑波大学文芸･言語学系
- 橋本修, "マエ･アト節のトキ解釈", 文芸言語研究･言語編, 32, pp.49~60 (1997), 筑波大学文芸･言語学系
- Hopper, P. J., "文法化" (2003), 九州大学出版会