四方正木、及び『深契情話恋の若竹』の 成立時期について
About the establishment time of Yomono-masaki and “Koinowakatake”
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It was 1833 when Itoi-takesi activities to solidify its position as a successor to the name Jippensya-ikku II. First of all, in the epilogue of the three volumes of “Adakurabe-imayogusi”, I researched a person named “Kyogechusya-Yomono- masaki” who talks about Itoi’s name. As a result, it was possible to point out the fallacy of the preceding catalog that “Kyogechusya-Yomono－masaki” is “Yomono- umehiko”. I have demonstrated that Yomono-masaki was neither “Kyokabo- Yomono-takisui II” nor his son “Yomono-umehiko=Machusono-umehiko”. Then, a volume of Itoi’s ninzyobon “Koino-wakatake” was published in 1833. In fact, the time when this ninzyobon was established has not been determined even in previous studies. Therefore, it was necessary to investigate the bibliography. As a result, it was found that the publisher, Chyoziya, who obtained one volume published in 1830, used the board as it was for the text, and remade the daisen(題簽), prologue, kuchie(口絵), illustrations, dvertisements, and okuzuke(奥付). When announcing that the author had named Jippensha Ikku, it was concluded that the first edition of 1833 was reprinted in line with the trend of Ninjyobon.
Abstract
It was 1833 when Itoi-takesi activities to solidify its position as a successor to the name Jippensya-ikku II. First of all, in the epilogue of the three volumes of “Adakurabe-imayogusi”, I researched a person named “Kyogechusya-Yomono- masaki” who talks about Itoi’s name. As a result, it was possible to point out the fallacy of the preceding catalog that “Kyogechusya-Yomono－masaki” is “Yomono- umehiko”. I have demonstrated that Yomono-masaki was neither “Kyokabo- Yomono-takisui II” nor his son “Yomono-umehiko=Machusono-umehiko”. Then, a volume of Itoi’s ninzyobon “Koino-wakatake” was published in 1833. In fact, the time when this ninzyobon was established has not been determined even in previous studies. Therefore, it was necessary to investigate the bibliography. As a result, it was found that the publisher, Chyoziya, who obtained one volume published in 1830, used the board as it was for the text, and remade the daisen(題簽), prologue, kuchie(口絵), illustrations, dvertisements, and okuzuke(奥付). When announcing that the author had named Jippensha Ikku, it was concluded that the first edition of 1833 was reprinted in line with the trend of Ninjyobon.
참고문헌 (22)
- 江戸軟派全集刊行会, "人情廓の鶯、仇競今様櫛:人情本集", pp.91~211 (1927), 江戸軟派全集刊行会
- 内村和至, "四方梅彦雑纂―幕末歌舞伎･戯作の一側面", 歌舞伎研究と批評, 34, pp.81~ (2005)
- 内村和至, "四方梅彦の事績", 文芸研究, 100, pp.177~208 (2006), 明治大学
- 内村和至, "四方梅彦について—訂正･補遺", 文芸研究, 101, pp.25~55 (2007), 明治大学
- 内村和至, "四方梅彦について―訂正･補遺(二)", 文芸研究, 103, pp.41~ (2007), 明治大学
- 川田壽, "続江戸名所図会を読む", pp.3~ (1995), 東京堂出版
- 강지현, "磯川南嶺・東船笑登満人の文政中期著作活動について", 일어일문학연구, 113, pp.217~239 (2020), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
- 강지현, "東船笑登満人・十字亭の文政十一年著作活動について － 為永門下から十返舎門下へ －", 日本語文學, 1(85), pp.109~127 (2020), 한국일본어문학회[DOI]
- 강지현, "十字亭三九の文政末期・天保初期著作活動について", 日本語敎育, (92), pp.129~140 (2020), 한국일본어교육학회[DOI]
- 강지현, "糸井武作『仇競今様櫛』からみる天保四年の 「二代目十返舎一九」公表を巡って", 일본언어문화, (52), pp.145~164 (2020), 한국일본언어문화학회
- 康志賢, "礫川南嶺･東船笑登満人･十字亭三九に関する再考察", 語文研究, 130-131, pp.264~279 (2021), 九州大学国語国文学会
- 강지현, "糸井武の「二代目十返舎一九」としての著作活動考", 日本學硏究, 62, pp.193~208 (2021), 일본연구소[DOI]
- 小林ふみ子, "酒月米人小伝, 法政大学学術機関リポジトリ", pp.2005
- 小林ふみ子, "天明狂歌研究", pp.328~ (2009), 汲古書院
- 神保五弥, "為永春水の研究", pp.302~ (1964), 白日社
- 中山尚夫, "十返舎一九研究", pp.244~ (2002), おうふう
- 浜田義一郎, "江戸文学地名辞典", pp.29~ (1973), 東京堂出版
- 本田康雄, "二世十返舎一九の漂白－盛田家文書について", 国文学研究資料館紀要, 12, pp.107~118 (1986)
- 村上静人, "貞操婦女八賢誌下、深契情話恋の若竹･吉原楊枝", pp.267~456 (1925), 人情本刊行会
- 山崎麓, "改訂日本小説書目年表", pp.845~ (1977), ゆまに書房
- 山杢誠, "二世十返舎一九と為永春水", 白山国文, 1, pp.23~31 (1997), 東洋大学国語国文学会
- "歴史の文字 記載･活字･活版 - 東京大学総合研究博物館"[URL]