Korean University Student Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback on English Writing
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
The purpose of this study was to determine the preferences of Korean university students among five specific types of written corrective feedback (WCF) for English writing. A cross-sectional sample of ninety-two freshmen at a private university were administered an anonymous questionnaire. The participants were given examples of passages using the different types of WCF and were asked to rate the usefulness of each on a scale of one to seven. The study also wanted to determine the five types of WCF. Follow up group interviews were conducted to gain additional information about their preferences. The results of a repeated-measures ANOVA clearly showed Direct WCF was preferred by the students over the other methods by significant margin. ANOVA tests showed a cluster of three methods: Indirect A, Meta A, and Meta B in second place. There was no significant difference between the participants’ preference for these three methods. ANOVA also showed Indirect B, as the least useful of all the methods. Prior to the time of the study, the students had little experience with methods other than direct correction. However, the group interviews showed that the students understood the potential value of the indirect methods.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the preferences of Korean university students among five specific types of written corrective feedback (WCF) for English writing. A cross-sectional sample of ninety-two freshmen at a private university were administered an anonymous questionnaire. The participants were given examples of passages using the different types of WCF and were asked to rate the usefulness of each on a scale of one to seven. The study also wanted to determine the five types of WCF. Follow up group interviews were conducted to gain additional information about their preferences. The results of a repeated-measures ANOVA clearly showed Direct WCF was preferred by the students over the other methods by significant margin. ANOVA tests showed a cluster of three methods: Indirect A, Meta A, and Meta B in second place. There was no significant difference between the participants’ preference for these three methods. ANOVA also showed Indirect B, as the least useful of all the methods. Prior to the time of the study, the students had little experience with methods other than direct correction. However, the group interviews showed that the students understood the potential value of the indirect methods.
참고문헌 (57)
- Alshahrani, A., "Investigating teachers’ written corrective feedback practices in a Saudi EFL context: How do they align with their beliefs, institutional guidelines, and student preferences?", Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 37(2), pp.101~122 (2014)
- Amrhein, H. R., "Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers think is right and why?", Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2010, pp.13(2), 95~127
- Barnes, B. D., "The attributes of effective lecturers of English as a foreign language as perceived by students in a Korean university", Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), pp.139~152 (2010)
- Barnes, B. D., "Student perceptions of effective foreign language teachers : A quantitative investigation from a Korean university", Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), pp.19~36 (2013)
- Block, D., "A day in the life of a class : Teacher", learner perceptions of task purpose in conflict, 1994, pp.22(4), 473~486
- Brice, C., "ESL writers’ reactions to teacher commentary: Case study", Retrieved from the ERIC database (ED394312), ~ (1995)
- Busse, V., "How do students of German perceive feedback practices at university? A motivational exploration", Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(4), pp.406~424 (2013)
- Cathcart, R. L., "On TESOL ‘76", pp.41~53 (1976), TESOL
- Chen, S., "EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback : a case study of university students from Mainland China", Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(1), pp.1~17 (2016)
- Chin, Cheongsook, "EFL Learners' Perceptions on English Writing Tasks and Teacher Feedback", 영어어문교육, 13(1), pp.1~26 (2007), 한국영어어문교육학회
- Choi, Heeyoon., "A study on Korean students’ perceptions on teachers’ feedback in English writing classes", 석사, pp.2002
- 최연희, "Effects of Revision Training on L2 Writing", 영어교육, 65(1), pp.25~56 (2010), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
- Di Loreto, S., "The relationship between instructor feedback and ESL student anxiety", TESL Canada Journal, 31(1), pp.20~41 (2014)
- Diab, R. L., "EFL university students’ preferences for error correction and teacher feedback on writing", TESL Reporter, 38(1), pp.27~51 (2005)
- Ellis, G., "How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach?", ELT journal, 50(3), pp.213~218 (1996)
- Ellis, R., "A typology of written corrective feedback types", ELT journal, 63(2), pp.97~107 (2009)
- Elwood, J. A., "Student preferences vis-à-vis teacher feedback in university EFL writing classes in Japan", System, 42, pp.333~343 (2014)
- 은호윤, "A Study on Perceptions of Feedback between Students and Teachers in English Writing Course", 영어영문학연구, 41(3), pp.203~232 (2015), 대한영어영문학회
- Ferris, D. R., "Response to student writing : Implications for second language students. Mahwah" (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Ferris, D. R., "The"grammar correction"debate in L2 writing : Where are we, and where do we go from here?(and what do we do in the meantime…?)", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), pp.49~62 (2004)
- Ferris, D. R., "Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues", pp.81~104 (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Ferris, D. R., "Treatment of error in second language student writing." (2011), University of Michigan Press
- Hajian, L., "A study of students’ and teachers’ preferences and attitudes towards correction of classroom written errors in Iranian EFL context", International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(5), pp.287~297 (2014)
- Halimi, S. S., "Indonesian teachers’ and students’ preferences for error correction. Wacana", Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia, 10(1), pp.50~71 (2008)
- Hamouda, A., "A study of students and teachers’ preferences and attitudes towards correction of classroom written errors in Saudi EFL context", English Language Teaching, 4(3), pp.128~141 (2011)
- Haupt, J., "English language learners’ perceptions of the usefulness of types of form-focused written feedback", Writing & Pedagogy, 6(2), pp.283~305 (2014)
- 허재연, "Korean Students’ Perspectives on L2 Writing Difficulty, Needs, and Challenges", Studies in English Education, 20(2), pp.161~188 (2015), 글로벌영어교육학회
- Hyland, F., "Sugaring the pill : Praise and criticism in written feedback", Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), pp.185~212 (2001)
- 장성수, "Learners’ Proficiency Level and the Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback on L2 Acquisition", 응용언어학, 30(3), pp.27~49 (2014), 한국응용언어학회
- 정영경, "Use and effects of the tutoring service at the English Writing Lab", 영어교육연구, 27(3), pp.21~44 (2015), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
- 김현우, "The Perception Change toward Feedback in L2 Writing: An Analysis of Graduate Students’ Writing Processes", 영어교육, 64(3), pp.79~105 (2009), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
- 김지선, "A Way of Using Feedback in University EFL Classes in Korea", 현대영어영문학, 59(3), pp.95~123 (2015), 한국현대영어영문학회
- 김신혜, "The Writing process in the Process-oriented Writing Class", 영어교육연구, 16(3), pp.109~134 (2004), 팬코리아영어교육학회
- 김성연, "한국 고등학생들의 영어 쓰기에 대한 태도와 쓰기 교수법에 대한 인식", Studies in English Education, 19(1), pp.77~102 (2014), 글로벌영어교육학회
- Kim, Yanghee, "Teaching Korean university writing class", Asian EFL, 7(2), pp.69~90 (2005)
- Lee, I., "Error correction in the L2 writing classroom: What do students think?", TESL Canada Journal, 22(2), pp.1~16 (2005)
- Lee, I., "Student reactions to teacher feedback in two secondary Hong Kong classrooms", Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), pp.144~164 (2008)
- Lee, I., "Research into practice : Written corrective feedback", Language Teaching, 46(1), pp.108~119 (2013)
- 이상기, "Different Rater Groups and Their Feedback on Written Texts: Where Do They Focus Their Attention?", 영어교과교육, 12(1), pp.57~76 (2013), 한국영어교과교육학회
- 이상교, "NESTs’ Perceptions of Feedback on L2 Writing", 영어교육연구, 25(4), pp.47~66 (2013), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
- Leki, I., "The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college level writing classes", Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), pp.203~218 (1991)
- Liu, Xuelian, "EFL College Students’ Reactions to Their Writing Teachers’ Corrective Feedback", 영어교육, 69(3), pp.81~103 (2014), 한국영어교육학회
- Mahfoodh, O., "A qualitative case study of EFL students’affective reactions to and perceptions of their teachers’ written feedback", English Language Teaching, 4(3), pp.14~25 (2011)
- McCarger, D. F., "Teacher and student role expectations: cross cultural differences and implications", The Modern Language Journal, 77(2), pp.192~207 (1993)
- McMartin-Miller, C., "How much feedback is enough? : Instructor practices and student attitudes toward error treatment in second language writing", Assessing Writing, 19, pp.24~35 (2014)
- "Foreign language students’ perceptions of a reflective approach to text correction" (2006)[URL]
- 김보경, "The effect of teacher feedback on student motivation in an EFL writing class", 영어교과교육, 14(1), pp.23~41 (2015), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
- Nunan, D., "Communication and learning in the classroom community", pp.176~190 (1987), SEAMO Regional Language Centre
- Nunan, D., "Understanding language classrooms" (1989), Prentice Hall International(UK)Ltd
- Nunan, D., "Closing the gap between learning and instruction", TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), pp.133~158 (1995)
- Oladejo, J. A., "Error correction in ESL : Learners’ preferences", TESL Canada Journal, 10, pp.71~89 (1993)
- 류영숙, "The Effects of Indirect and Direct Error Feedback on Korean College Students’ Accuracy Improvement in Writing", Foreign Languages Education, 13(3), pp.241~262 (2006), 한국외국어교육학회
- Shultz, R. A., "Focus on form in the foreign language classroom : Students’ and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar", Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), pp.343~364 (1996)
- Ueno, J., "Learning styles and error correction: How do learning styles affect students’ perceptions towards error correction in a foreign language classroom? Bloomington", Indiana University. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED429452), ~ (1998)
- Wang, P., "Dealing with English majors’ written errors in Chinese universities", Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), pp.194~205 (2010)
- 이영주, "Trends and Challenges for EFL Writing Teacher Education in Korea : A Content Analysis", 인문과학연구, (29), pp.51~73 (2011), 인문과학연구소
- Zacharrias, N. T., "Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback", RELC Journal, 38(1), pp.38~52 (2007)
