한국 중국 주거건축 공간구성 비교
A Study on the Spatial Composition of Korean House and Chinese House
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study finds out the spatial composition of Korean and Chinese Houses with space syntax. The results of analysis so far are summarized as follow. First of all, korean house shall have priority in visible division system for gender classification and in space system for the distinction of status. But For chinese house, in visible or invisible, the higher hierarchy of space is placed more inside of the house. While korean house have high connectivity and opened space with MaDang, chinese one have closed space system. It shows difference between korean house which get privacy and authority by opened spaces and chinese house which get privacy by closed and deep spaces. So, although similar courtyard system, they shows different space system each other. Next, in case of apartment of nowadays, korean one have more opened spaces than chinese one. And It shows that korean apartment still reflect traditional lifestyle, preferred space and social structure. Korean house's opened space with MaDang has evolved into space of nowadays apartment of korea around livingroom. On the other hand, although chinese traditional house is in progress with yuànzi(院子) as center, nowadays apartment of china is in progress with dining room. Also, China is identified as having more independence from personal space than Korea.
Abstract
This study finds out the spatial composition of Korean and Chinese Houses with space syntax. The results of analysis so far are summarized as follow. First of all, korean house shall have priority in visible division system for gender classification and in space system for the distinction of status. But For chinese house, in visible or invisible, the higher hierarchy of space is placed more inside of the house. While korean house have high connectivity and opened space with MaDang, chinese one have closed space system. It shows difference between korean house which get privacy and authority by opened spaces and chinese house which get privacy by closed and deep spaces. So, although similar courtyard system, they shows different space system each other. Next, in case of apartment of nowadays, korean one have more opened spaces than chinese one. And It shows that korean apartment still reflect traditional lifestyle, preferred space and social structure. Korean house's opened space with MaDang has evolved into space of nowadays apartment of korea around livingroom. On the other hand, although chinese traditional house is in progress with yuànzi(院子) as center, nowadays apartment of china is in progress with dining room. Also, China is identified as having more independence from personal space than Korea.
참고문헌 (11)
- Amos Rapopoprt, "주거의 형태와 문화" (1995), 열화당
- B. Hillier, "The Social Logic of Space", Cambridge University Press
- 손세관, "넓게 본 중국의 주택" (2001), 열화당
- 손세관, "깊게 본 중국의 주택" (2001), 열화당
- 공동주택연구회, "한국 공동주택의 역사" (1999), 세진사
- 김성우, "중국 동부 합원 및 천정식민가와 한국 ㅁ자형 민가의 비교 연구", 대한건축회논문집, 16(8) (2000)
- 장동국, "영.호남 전통상류주택 공간의 비교분석에 관한 연구 - 공간구문론에 의한 ㅁ자형 주택의 공간해석을 중심으로 -", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 18(11), pp.125~132 (2002), 대한건축학회
- 최윤경, "공간의 권력화에 관한 연구:파놉티논과 양진당", 대한건축학회, 16(11) (2000)
- 김미나, "韓·中·日의 경계의식에 따른 주거공간의 경계구조", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 18(1), pp.123~131 (2002), 대한건축학회
- 심우갑, "한중일 집합주택 주호평면의 비교연구", 대한건축학회논문집, 16(11) (2000)
- 김봉렬, "시대를 담는 그릇" (1999), 이상건축
