본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

L2 Learners’ Comprehension of Conversational Implicatures

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

This study delves into Korean vocational college and university students’ comprehension of conversational implicatures in terms of perceived and actual difficulty. For this purpose, the study employs an implicature test. The participants are 126 vocational college students and 121 university students. The analysis demonstrates that conversational implicatures were more difficult for the vocational college students to comprehend than they were for the university students and that indirect criticism proved the most troublesome type of implicature for the two learner groups. The findings further show that the college group had a higher level of perceived difficulty with all five types of implicatures than the university group, whereas the former group had a higher level of actual test performance difficulty than the latter group, especially with relevance, POPE-Q, and Minimum Requirement Rule implicatures. Correlation analyses indicate that the learners’ perceived difficulty was not always in consonance with their actual difficulty. On the basis of the results, the study provides helpful suggestions to help the learners improve their comprehension of conversational implicatures.

Abstract

This study delves into Korean vocational college and university students’ comprehension of conversational implicatures in terms of perceived and actual difficulty. For this purpose, the study employs an implicature test. The participants are 126 vocational college students and 121 university students. The analysis demonstrates that conversational implicatures were more difficult for the vocational college students to comprehend than they were for the university students and that indirect criticism proved the most troublesome type of implicature for the two learner groups. The findings further show that the college group had a higher level of perceived difficulty with all five types of implicatures than the university group, whereas the former group had a higher level of actual test performance difficulty than the latter group, especially with relevance, POPE-Q, and Minimum Requirement Rule implicatures. Correlation analyses indicate that the learners’ perceived difficulty was not always in consonance with their actual difficulty. On the basis of the results, the study provides helpful suggestions to help the learners improve their comprehension of conversational implicatures.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Bouton, L. F., "A cross-cultural study of ability to interpret implicatures in English", World Englishes, 7(2), pp.183~196 (1988)
  2. Bouton, L. F., "The interpretation of implicature in English by NNS: Does it come automatically without being explicitly taught?", Pragmatics and Language Learning, 3, pp.53~65 (1992)
  3. Bouton, L. F., "Can NNS skill in interpreting implicature in American English be improved through explicit instruction? A pilot study", Pragmatics and Language Learning, 5, pp.88~108 (1994)
  4. Bouton, L. F., "Conversational implicature in a second language : Learned slowly when not deliberately taught", Journal of Pragmatics, 22(2), pp.157~167 (1994)
  5. Bouton, L. F., "Culture in second language teaching and learning", pp.47~70 (1999), Cambridge University Press
  6. Brown, D., "Principles of language learning and teaching" (2007), Pearson Education
  7. Brown, P., "Politeness : Some universals in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  8. Cook, M., "The development of comprehension in interlanguage pragmatics : The case of request strategies in English", Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 25(1), pp.19~39 (2002)
  9. Garcia, P., "Pragmatic comprehension of high and low level language learners", TESL-EJ, 8(2), pp.1~15 (2004)
  10. Grice, H. P., "Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3", pp.31~58 (1975), Academic Press
  11. Harris, J., "The teaching of implicature to ESL learners", master’s, pp.1995
  12. Holtgraves, T., "Interpreting indirect replies", Cognitive Psychology, 37(1), pp.1~27 (1998)
  13. Holtgraves, T., "Comprehending indirect replies: When and how are their conveyed meanings activated?", Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), pp.519~540 (1999)
  14. Ishihara, N., "Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet", pp.145~166 (2010), Longman Applied Linguistics
  15. 정우현, "Textbook Analysis: Pragmatic Inappropriateness in the Realization of Speech Acts", 영어교과교육, 16(3), pp.49~76 (2017), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  16. 정우현, "L2 Learners’ Pragmatic Awareness in Comparison to Grammatical Awareness in Tertiary Education Settings", 현대영어교육, 20(2), pp.19~32 (2019), 현대영어교육학회[DOI]
  17. KIM CHRISTIAN, "The Process of Korean Learners of English in Understanding Conversational Implicatures", The SNU Journal of Education Research, 21, pp.57~79 (2012), 교육종합연구원
  18. 김덕영, "한국 EFL 학생들의 대화함축 이해에 관한 연구", 영어영문학연구, 50(3), pp.57~72 (2008), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
  19. 김종보, "의사소통능력 향상을 위한 교수방법 연구 - 전문대학 교양영어를 중심으로", 영어교육연구, 6(1), pp.147~163 (1997), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  20. Kubota, M., "Teachability of conversational implicature to Japanese EFL learners", IRLT(Institute for Research in Language Teaching)Bulletin, 9, pp.35~67 (1995)
  21. JinSookLee, "Interpreting Conversational Implicatures:A study of Korean learners of English", Korea TESOL Journal, 5(1), pp.1~26 (2002), 대한영어교육학회
  22. 이선미, "한국 대학생 영어 학습자들의 동기 및 탈동기 요인", 언어과학연구, (68), pp.287~312 (2014), 언어과학회
  23. 문영인, "우리나라 대학생들의 영어 대화 함의 해석 능력", Foreign Languages Education, 16(3), pp.357~376 (2009), 한국외국어교육학회
  24. Murray, J. C., "Do bears fly? Revisiting conversational implicature in instructional pragmatics", TESL-EJ, 15(2), pp.1~30 (2011)
  25. Roever, C., "Testing ESL pragmatics" (2005), Peter Lang
  26. Roever, C., "Validation of a web-based test of ESL pragmalinguistics", Language Testing, 23(2), pp.229~256 (2006)
  27. Roever, C., "Assessing second language pragmatics", pp.43~64 (2013), Palgrave Macmillan
  28. Roever, C., "Learner background factors and learning of second language pragmatics", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52(4), pp.377~401 (2014)
  29. Taguchi, N., "Comprehending implied meaning in English as a second language", The Modern Language Journal, 89(4), pp.543~562 (2005)
  30. Taguchi, N., "Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic comprehension in English as a foreign language", TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), pp.313~338 (2007)
  31. Taguchi, N., "Corpus-informed assessment of comprehension of conversational implicatures in L2 English", TESOL Quarterly, 43(4), pp.739~750 (2009)
  32. Taguchi, N., "Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching", pp.19~41 (2013), John Benjamins
  33. Taguchi, N., "The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics", pp.31~46 (2019), Routledge
  34. Wesely, P. M., "Learner attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs in language learning", Foreign Language Annals, 45(1), pp.98~117 (2012)
  35. Yamanaka, J., "Effects of proficiency and length of residence on pragmatic comprehension of Japanese ESL learners", Second Language Studies, 22(1), pp.107~175 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)