사회부과 완벽주의는 항상 부적응적인가?: 잠재 프로파일 분석을 통한 적응 집단의 탐색
Is Socially Prescribed Perfectionism Always Maladaptive?: Exploring Adaptive Groups Through Latent Profile Analysis
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는사회부과완벽주의와 그릿, 개인지향 및사회지향성취동기, 지각된 사회적 지지를바탕으로잠재집단을탐색하고, 정신적안녕감과학업적적응의차이를확인하고자하였다. 만19~25세대학생400명을 대상으로온라인자기보고설문을실시하였다. 잠재프로파일분석결과‘평균형(44.8%)’, ‘적응적 비사회완벽형(15.9%)’, ‘저자원 취약형(14.7%)’, ‘적응적 사회완벽형(24.6%)’의 4개 잠재 집단이 도출되었다. 각 잠재프로파일별결과변수의차이를살펴본결과, 그릿과개인지향성취동기, 지각된사회적지지와같은심리적자원수준이높을수록전반적인안녕감및학업적적응수준이높았다. 특히‘적응적사회완벽형’의사회적안녕감이‘적응적 비사회완벽형’보다 유의하게 높았으며, ‘저자원 취약형’의 심리적 안녕감은‘평균형’보다 유의하게 낮았다. 이러한 결과는 집단주의 문화인 한국의 대학생들에게는 사회부과 완벽주의가 사회적안녕감에 긍정적으로 기능할 수 있음을보여주며, 그릿과개인지향 성취동기, 지각된 사회적지지가보호적자원이될수있음을시사한다.
Abstract
This study aimed to explore latent groups based on socially prescribed perfectionism(SPP), grit, individual-oriented and social-oriented achievement motivation(IOAM and SOAM), and perceived social support, and examine differences in mental well-being and academic adaptation. An online self-report survey was conducted with 400 university students aged 19-25. Latent profile analysis revealed four latent groups: ‘general type(44.8%)’, ‘adaptive non-perfectionism type(15.9%)’, ‘low-resource vulnerable type(14.7%)’, and ‘adaptive perfectionism type(24.6%)’. Analysis of outcome variables across latent profiles showed that higher levels of grit, IOAM, and perceived social support were associated with better overall well-being and academic adaptation. Notably, the ‘adaptive perfectionism type’ showed significantly higher social well-being than the ‘adaptive non-perfectionism type’, while the ‘low-resource vulnerable type’ had significantly lower psychological well-being than the ‘general type’. These results suggest that SPP can positively function for social well-being among Korean university students in a collectivistic culture, and that grit, IOAM, and perceived social support can serve as protective factors.