본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

집단구성원의 기분이 집단의사결정에 미치는 영향력에 대한 이론적 고찰과 실증적 분석연구-중국 및 동아시아 문화권의 집단주의 문화를 중심으로

The Effects of Moods on Group Decision Making: Implications for Collectivistic Culture

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study investigates the effect of mood on group decision-making in terms of polarization. The design of the study was a 3(mood: positive, negative, vs. neutral) * 2(decision: individual vs. group) mixed design, with mood being a between-subject variable and decision being a within-subject variable. Participants were 184 undergraduate students from two universities located in Seoul, South Korea. For the purpose of mood manipulation, participants were asked to describe events that aroused the most happiness or the most sad emotional states from their life experiences. They were then asked to record their decision in terms of risk taking. Through ANOVA, it was found that all three hypotheses were supported in statistical significance. First, groups in the neutral mood condition, when presented with a risk inducing choice dilemma, showed a risky shift in their decisions. Second, groups in the happy mood condition did not show a statistically significant shift in their decisions. Last, groups in the sad mood condition became riskier than either group of the other two mood conditions. Two major perspectives can account for mood's effects on depth of information processing. One explanation posits that participants in the sad mood condition processed information centrally, that was elaborate and process information relevant to the task at hand. Happy participants, on the other hand, are believed to be less capable of systematic information processing. The second explanation, motivational in nature, posits that the shift demonstrated in the sad mood condition is a result of the motivation of sad participants to get our of their negative mood state, whereas happy participants are motivated to maintain their mood and avoid complex information processing. The findings are discussed in relation to collectivistic culture including China and East Asia.

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of mood on group decision-making in terms of polarization. The design of the study was a 3(mood: positive, negative, vs. neutral) * 2(decision: individual vs. group) mixed design, with mood being a between-subject variable and decision being a within-subject variable. Participants were 184 undergraduate students from two universities located in Seoul, South Korea. For the purpose of mood manipulation, participants were asked to describe events that aroused the most happiness or the most sad emotional states from their life experiences. They were then asked to record their decision in terms of risk taking. Through ANOVA, it was found that all three hypotheses were supported in statistical significance. First, groups in the neutral mood condition, when presented with a risk inducing choice dilemma, showed a risky shift in their decisions. Second, groups in the happy mood condition did not show a statistically significant shift in their decisions. Last, groups in the sad mood condition became riskier than either group of the other two mood conditions. Two major perspectives can account for mood's effects on depth of information processing. One explanation posits that participants in the sad mood condition processed information centrally, that was elaborate and process information relevant to the task at hand. Happy participants, on the other hand, are believed to be less capable of systematic information processing. The second explanation, motivational in nature, posits that the shift demonstrated in the sad mood condition is a result of the motivation of sad participants to get our of their negative mood state, whereas happy participants are motivated to maintain their mood and avoid complex information processing. The findings are discussed in relation to collectivistic culture including China and East Asia.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Asch, S. E, "Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority", Psychological Monographs, 70, pp.410~416 (1956)
  2. Bless, H, "Mood and persuasion: A cognitive response analysis", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, pp.331~345 (1990)
  3. Bishop, G. D, "Information influence in group discussion", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, pp.92~104 (1974)
  4. Bower, G. H, "Mood and memory", American Psychologist, 36, pp.129~148 (1981)
  5. Bower, G. H, "Mood congruity of social judgments in Emotion and social judgments", pp.31~53 (1991), Pergamon
  6. Brehm, S. S, "Social Psychology" (1993), Houghton
  7. Brewer M, "Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing", Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 50, pp.67~73 (1986)
  8. Brown, R, "Social Psychology" (1965), Free Press
  9. Craik, F. I. M, "Levels of processing: A framework for memory research", Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, pp.671~684 (1972)
  10. Eagly, A. H, "Johnson, Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis", Psychological Bulletin, 108, pp.233~256 (1990)
  11. Hofstede, G, "Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related attitudes" (1980), Sage
  12. Festinger, L, "A theory of social comparison processes", Human Relations, 7, pp.117~140 (1954)
  13. Forgas, J. P, "Emotion and social judgments" (1991), Pergamon
  14. Forgas, J. P, "After the movies: the effects of transient mood states on socialjudgments", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, pp.478~489 (1987)
  15. Frijida, N. H, "The laws of emotion", American Psychologist, 43, pp.349~358 (1988)
  16. Isen, A. M, "The influence of positive affect on decision making and cognitive organization", Advances in. Consumer Research, 11, pp.534~537 (1984)
  17. Isen, A. M, "Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior in Advances in experimental social psychology" (1987), Academic Press
  18. Isen, A. M.⋅, "The influence of affect on categorization", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, pp.1122~1131 (1984)
  19. Isen, A. M, "Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, pp.11~23 (1987)
  20. Isen, A. M, "The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, pp.1413~1426 (1985)
  21. Isen, A. M.⋅, "The effect of positive feelings on risk-taking: When the chips are down", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, pp.194~202 (1983)
  22. Isen, A. M.,⋅, "Affect, accessibility of material and behavior: A cognitive loop", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, pp.1~12 (1978)
  23. Isenberg, D. J, "Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, pp.1141~1151 (1986)
  24. Karau, S. J.⋅, "Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, pp.681~706 (1993)
  25. Mackie, D. M, "Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, pp.27~40 (1989)
  26. Moscovici, S, "Foreword in Health and illness: a social psychological analysis" (1973), Academic Press
  27. Myers, D. G, "Discussion-induced attitude polarization", Human Relations, 28, pp.699~714 (1975)
  28. Myers, D. G, "The polarizing effect of group discussion", American Scientist, 63, pp.297~303 (1975)
  29. Myers, D. G.⋅, "Enhancement of dominant risk tendencies in group discussion", Psychological Reports, 30, pp.615~623 (1972)
  30. Petty, R. E, "Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change" (1986), Springer-Verlag
  31. Reisenzein, R, "Stumpf s cognitive-evaluative theory of emotion", American Psychologist, 47, pp.34~45 (1992)
  32. Salovey, P, "Cognitions about the self: Connecting feeling states and social behavior", Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, pp.143~166 (1985)
  33. Schwarz, N, "How do I feel about it? The informative function of mood in Affect, cognition, and social behavior", pp.44~62 (1988), C. J. Hogrefe
  34. Snyder, J.⋅, "Treating impulsively and program noncompliance with self-instruction in Therapies for adolescents" (1982), Jossey Bass
  35. Stoner, J. A. F, "A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk in Social Psychology" (1961), Free Press
  36. Thayer, R. E, "The biopsychology of mood and arousal" (1989), Oxford University Press
  37. Triandis, H, "Culture and social behavior", Graw-Hill
  38. Triandis, H, "Individualism and collectivism" (1994), Westview
  39. Vinokur, A, "Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group induced shifts: A group problem-solving approach", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, pp.305~315 (1974)
  40. Wallach, M. A, "Group influence on individual risk taking", Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, pp.75~86 (1962)
  41. Wegener, D. T, "Mood-management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, pp.1034~1048 (1994)
  42. Wyer, R. S, "The effects of feedback about self and others on the recall and judgments of feedback-relevant information in Handbook of social cognition (2nd edition, vol10)" (1983), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc
  43. Wyer, R. S, "Psychological Review", Psychological Review, 93, pp.322~359 (1986)
  44. Wyer, R. S, "Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information in Social cognition: The Ontario S y m p o s i u m , Vol. 1" (1981), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc
  45. Zaccaro, S. J, "The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive group task", Journal of Applied Psychology, 18, pp.837~851 (1988)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)