先秦汉语否定词系统及其演变试说
A Brief Description of the Systematization and Evolution of the Privatives of the HAN Language in the Pre-historic QIN Dynasty Era
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
本文以“不+N”结构的性质为切入点，根据时间性和空间性的区分，把先秦汉语的否定词分为两大类五小类，并梳理了汉语否定词系统从先秦到现代汉语的演变。本文还重点说明了两个问题：（一）“不+名”是否定词“不”对名词的否定，“不”和名词之间既没有隐含一个动词，名词也没有活用为动词；（二）现代汉语中的“没有”有两个来源，先来源于名词否定标记“无”，再来源于动词否定标记“未”。
Abstract
Based on the nature of "Bu (不)+ N" structure, this paper divides the negative words in pre-Qin Chinese into two categories and five sub-categories according to the distinction of time and space, and combs the evolution of Chinese negative word system from Pre-Qin to modern Chinese. This paper also focuses on two problems: (1) whether "Bu(不) + N" is the negation of noun by the determiner "bu(不)", and whether there is no implied verb between "Bu(不)" and noun, nor is the noun used flexibly as a verb; (2) there are two sources of "MEIYOU(没有)" in modern Chinese, first from the negative sign of noun "WU(无)", then from the negative sign of verb "WEI(未)". Traditionally, the negation words of pre-Qin Chinese are divided into four categories: (1) The "Bu(不)" category, which means simple negation. (2) The"Wei(未)"category, indicating a negative attitude towards the past. (3) The "Fei(非)" category, which conveys negation of judgment. (4) The "Mo(莫)" category, signifying prohibition. Such classification, though comes with a certain degree of rationality, but embraces unscientific elements. For example, the "Bu(不)" category as a notion of simple negation is not a scientific explanation. This paper attempts to apply the research results of negative words in modern Chinese to the study of negative words in ancient Chinese. Professor Nie Renfa聂仁发 (2001) believes that the time significance of the "Bu(不)" and "Meiyou(没有)" categories in modern Chinese is reflected in the "Object(体)" rather than "time（时）" and summarizes their differences as: "Bu(不)" ：【+Negation】[-Realization] Or“Mei(没)“：【+Negation】[+Realization] Professor Nie”s belief is truly inspirational. Hence we pursue further, by judging from the time elements of the pre-Qin Chinese negation word system, to try to divide them into two main categories as well as five small sub-categories. We shall be deeply obliged to receive feedbacks in any forms as well as criticisms as to determine whether this classification is appropriate, correct and in particular with reference to the negation of judgment as a [-Time elements]; while the negation of the imperatives as a [+Time elements].
참고문헌 (13)
- 白 荃, "“不”、“没（有）”教学和研究上的误区——关于“不”、“没（有）”的意义和用法的探讨", 语言教学与研究, (3), pp.21~25 (2000)
- 车淑娅, "〈韩非子〉否定副词研究", 西安电子科技大学学报 (社科版), (4), pp.129~135 (2003)
- 葛佳才, "否定副词在东汉的混同兼用", 湛江师范学院学报, (2), pp.61~65 (2004)
- 高顺全, "进行体、持续体的否定及相关问题", 世界汉语教学, (4), pp.32~40 (2003)
- 蒋冀骋, "近代汉语纲要" (1997), 湖南教育出版社
- 李铁根, "“不”、“没（有）”的用法及其所受的时间制约", 汉语学习, (2), pp.2~7 (2003)
- 聂仁发, "否定词“不”与“没有”的语义特征及其时间意义", 汉语学习, (1), pp.21~27 (2001)
- 沈开木, "“不”字的否定范围和否定中心的探索", 中国语文, (6) (1984)
- 徐时仪, "否定词“没”“没有”的来源和语法化过程", 湖州师范学院学报, (2), pp.1~6 (2003)
- 许敏云, "今文〈尚书〉中的否定副词", 宜春学院学报 (社科版), (3), pp.77~80 (2005)
- 杨荣祥, "近代汉语否定副词及相关语法现象略论", 语言研究, (1), pp.20~28 (1999)
- 杨伯峻, "古汉语语法及其发展" (2001), 语文出版社
- 志村良治, "中国中世语法史研究" (1995), 中华书局