吳相錦『文選』李善注引『左傳』注及其各家注考略
Li Shan’s Commentary on the Selected Writings, Citing the Commentary on the Zuo Zhuan and Its Commentaries by Various Literati
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
李善所注『左傳』內容依照正文詞彙及其內容,注引多圍繞其主要歷史事件,詞語出典等方面。另外,即便『文選』作品正文有其主導思想,或受『左傳』影響而寫之,通過李善注引此經文在『文選』作品之中,既是客觀地將字詞注解到位,亦有在觀念上突出了ꡒ以民为重ꡓ的思想。對李善注引『左氏傳』各家注的問題上,李善並不受政治所主張『五經』統一的影響,他以杜注為主,並不排斥其他『左傳』各家注,依照『文選』正文所載,認為符合正文語詞,適當使用北學之服虔『左傳』注以及其他注釋者之注。其中,筆者疑李善當參考服䖍『解誼』本、賈逵『春秋左氏解詁』,而馬融的話,很難說是注文出自馬融『春秋三傳異同說』,其文當引自當時其他文獻。『文選』注本所載馬融注,其內容皆可從孔穎達疏文中查到較『文選』注更加詳細的整條注釋,然就『文選』注來看,尤其今天可視為李善注的注釋皆在其舊注的範圍之中,李善是否對後面在舊注出現同樣字詞的情況下,引用舊注為其他作品注解,也是很有可能的。
Abstract
Li Shan’s commentary on the Selected Writings appears in 304 of his works, ranging from the Xidufu, an excerpt from the Zuo Zhuan, to the Ritual Essay, Ji Qu Yuan Wen. The Zuo Zhuan records a wide range of topics, from the evolution of history to various rituals, social customs, astronomy and geography, rhymes, proverbs, and a variety of literature. Li Shan’s commentary on the Zuo Zhuan is based on the main text and its content, with citations centered on its main historical events and the origin of its words. On the question of Li Shan’s citation of the Zuo Zhuan notes, we can see through examination that Li Shan was not influenced by the political advocacy of the unification of the Five Classics, and that he took Du’s notes as his main focus and did not exclude the other Zuo Zhuan notes, and in accordance with what is stated in the text of the Selected Works, he thought that it conformed to the wording of the text and made appropriate use of the Fu Qian’s service of the pianist’s notes on the Zuo Zhuan as well as the notes of the other annotators. Among them, the author suspects that Li Shan should have referred to the text of Fu Qian’s “Jie Yi” and Jia Kui’s “ChunQiu ZuoShi JieGu”, while Ma Rong’s words can hardly be said to be a comment from Ma Rong’s “ChunQiu SanZhuan YiTongShuo”, but rather a text quoted from other documents of the time. The contents of Ma Rong’s commentaries in the “Selected Writings” can be found in Kong Yingda’s commentary, which is more detailed than the “Selected Writings” commentary. However, in terms of the “Selected Writings” commentary, especially nowadays, it can be regarded that the commentaries of Li Shan’s commentaries are within the scope of his old commentaries, and it is quite possible that Li Shan cited his old commentaries as commentaries on other works in the case of the same words in his old commentaries in the later years.
참고문헌 (28)
- 蔡夢弼, "杜工部草堂詩箋, 清光緒黎庶昌刻古逸叢書本", ~
- 陳壽, "三國誌" (1982), 中華書局
- 丁晏, "左傳杜解集正, 民國張氏刻適園叢書本", ~
- 董文渙輯, "集韻編雅, 清同治十二年洪洞董氏刻本", ~
- 杜預, "十三經注疏" (2009), 中華書局
- 服虔, "鄭氏佚書十五之一·春秋傳服氏注, 清光緒十四年浙江書局刻鄭氏佚書本", ~
- 高步瀛, "文選李注義疏" (1985), 中華書局
- 侯康, "補後漢書藝文誌, 清光緒十七年廣雅書局刻本", ~
- 黃奭輯, "漢學堂經解逸書考·服虔春秋左氏傳解誼, 清道光黃氏刻民國二十三年江都朱長圻補刊本", ~
- 洪亮吉, "春秋左傳詁, 南菁書院續經解本", ~
- 李富孫, "春秋三傳異文釋, 清道光蔣氏刻別下齋叢書本", ~
- 劉沅, "十三經恆解箋解本·春秋恆解" (2016), 巴蜀書社
- 劉寶楠, "論語正義" (1990), 中華書局
- 陸德明, "經典釋文序錄疏證" (2008), 中華書局
- 梁章鉅, "文選旁證 清光緒八年 吳下重刻本", ~ (1882)
- 賈逵, "賈逵春秋左氏解詁, 清道光黃氏刻民國二十三年江都朱長圻補刊本", ~
- 馬瑞辰, "毛詩傳箋通釋, 南菁書院續經解本", ~
- 釋玄應, "一切經音義, 清海山仙館叢書本", ~
- 汪師韓, "清代文選學名著集成" (2013), 廣陵書社
- 嚴可均, "唐石經校文, 清嘉慶九年刻四錄堂類集本", ~
- 嚴可均, "全上古三代秦漢三國六朝文" (1958), 中華書局
- 余蕭客, "古經解鉤沉 文淵閣 四庫全書本", ~
- 阮元, "經籍撰詁, 清嘉慶阮氏琅嬛仙館刻本", ~
- 張聰鹹, "左傳杜注辨證, 清光緒貴池劉世珩刻聚學軒叢書本", ~
- 張涌泉, "敦煌經部文獻合集" (2008), 中華書局
- 陳緒波, "李善注文選徵引左傳考釋", 甘肅聯合大學學報 (2012)
- 陳緒波, "文選李善注中的左傳材料述略", 河西學院學報 (2013)
- 劉高尚, "文選李善注引經部佚書考", 碩士, pp.2015
