A Suggestion on the Ethics in Artificial Intelligence
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Now and in the future, AI is inevitable and necessary for our lives in almost every respect. There are many aspects and consequences our use of AI and the AI itself (as an independent actor in the future) generate, some of which are good, valuable as intended and desired by us human beings, but some of which are bad, harmful, or dangerous whether it is intended or not. Ever since AI was started to be used, there has been a variety of discussions on the ethics which may work as guidelines for the regulation of its development and use. Some of the ethics have not yet become enforceable norm and some others exist already as a part of regulation enforceable under the power of governments. The designers or developers of such ethics are diverse from an individual to international organizations. Almost all of the AI Ethics are not sufficiently satisfying the requirements, needs, and hopes of the society members not only local level, but, national or international level. They lack something in ensuring to make all the stake-holders’ participation in developing the ethics and to achieve such key objectives as the accountability, explainability, traceability, no-bias, and privacy protection in the development, use, and improvement of AI. Based upon the review and analysis of the currently available AI Ethics, this article tries to find and suggest a method to design, develop, and improve continuously the AI Ethics through the National AI Ethics Platform where all the relevant stake-holders participate and exchange ideas and opinions together with the AI itself as a device to help, with its great capacity to deal with big data, all the processing and operation of the ethics through simulations utilizing all the input data provided by the participants and the situations surrounding the participants not in a static mode but a dynamic continuing mode.
Abstract
Now and in the future, AI is inevitable and necessary for our lives in almost every respect. There are many aspects and consequences our use of AI and the AI itself (as an independent actor in the future) generate, some of which are good, valuable as intended and desired by us human beings, but some of which are bad, harmful, or dangerous whether it is intended or not. Ever since AI was started to be used, there has been a variety of discussions on the ethics which may work as guidelines for the regulation of its development and use. Some of the ethics have not yet become enforceable norm and some others exist already as a part of regulation enforceable under the power of governments. The designers or developers of such ethics are diverse from an individual to international organizations. Almost all of the AI Ethics are not sufficiently satisfying the requirements, needs, and hopes of the society members not only local level, but, national or international level. They lack something in ensuring to make all the stake-holders’ participation in developing the ethics and to achieve such key objectives as the accountability, explainability, traceability, no-bias, and privacy protection in the development, use, and improvement of AI. Based upon the review and analysis of the currently available AI Ethics, this article tries to find and suggest a method to design, develop, and improve continuously the AI Ethics through the National AI Ethics Platform where all the relevant stake-holders participate and exchange ideas and opinions together with the AI itself as a device to help, with its great capacity to deal with big data, all the processing and operation of the ethics through simulations utilizing all the input data provided by the participants and the situations surrounding the participants not in a static mode but a dynamic continuing mode.
참고문헌 (31)
- Alan FT Winfield, "Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems" (2017), Springer International Publishing
- "Article 13 of Korean Criminal Code. (In Korean: 대한민국 형법 13조)", ~
- "Article 750 of Korean Civil Code.(In Korean: 대한민국 민법 750조)", ~
- "Big Standard Korean Dictionary published by the National Institute of Korean Language (In Korean: 국립국어원 표준국어대사전)", ~
- "For a Meaningful Artificial Intelligence - Towards a French and European Strategy" (2018)[URL]
- European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies, "Statement on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and ‘Autonomous’ Systems" (2018)
- "Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI" (2019)[URL]
- Algorithms in Decision-Making, Fourth Report of Session 2017-19, "House of Commons", ~
- "Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy"[URL]
- Jacob Turner, "Robot Rules - Regulating Artificial Intelligence" (2019), Palgrave Macmillan
- Kate Crawford, "There Is a Blind Spot in AI Research", Nature, 538, pp.311~ (2016)
- 김효은, "의사결정 자동화에 대한 대응으로서의 인공지능윤리 교육", 윤리교육연구, (55), pp.277~308 (2020), 한국윤리교육학회[DOI]
- 한국인공지능법학회, "인공지능과 법", pp.17~21 (2019), 박영사
- 이현주, "윤리경영과 기업윤리 용어 개념에 대한 이론적 고찰", 윤리경영연구, 12(1), pp.4~10 (2010), 한국윤리경영학회
- LeCun, Y., "Deep learning", Nature, 521(7553), pp.436~444 (2016)
- Luengo-Oroz, M., "Solidarity should be a core ethical principle of AI", Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11) (2019)
- Preparing For the Future of Artificial Intelligence, "National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology", Executive Office of the President, Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), ~ (2016)
- "New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan"[URL]
- Pastor-Escuredo, D., "How computation is helping unravel the dynamics of morphogenesis", Frontiers in Physics, (8) (2020)
- Paula Boddington, "Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence" (2017), Springer
- Paul Nemitz, "Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), pp.20180089~ (2018), The Royal Society[DOI]
- Rahwan, I., "Machine behaviour", Nature, 568(7753) (2019)
- René von Schomberg, "Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields" (2011), European Commission
- "Regulation (EU) 2016", 679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95, EC, pp.O J L 119, 2016[DOI]
- Virginia Dignum, "Ethics by Design: Necessity or Curse?", Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI, 2018, ~[DOI]
- Vinuesa, R., "The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals", Nature Communications, 11(1), pp.1~10 (2020)
- Wigel, V., "SophoLab: Experimental Computational Philosophy", 3TU Ethics, 3 (2007)