Future Oriented SMART SOCIETY and Ethical Issues
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study explores the ethical issues that arise in building a community where humans can use smart technology to lead happier lives, a smart society. Method: Technology in a smart society is not unrelated to the human variable, no matter how advanced its level is. As humans pursue value, smart societies also need to be explored from an ethical perspective. This study provides the need for an ethical approach that emphasizes humanity in the process of building and maintaining a smart society. The research was conducted by contents based approach. Results: This research showed that the smart society was clarified by the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and got two characteristics as follows: First, AI, which is the core of smart society in particular, fosters human nature and potentialility through automatic self-realization, human representation, personal and social skills, and social cohesion. Second, smart AI ethical standards include beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice, and explicability. Conclusion: This paper presented a normative and substantial directions to what preparations should be made for human-centered ethical coexistence in a future-oriented smart society. The ethical virtue or a way of living could be summarized as followed: love for humans, retrospective understanding, variable dialogue, self-sustainability, tarnsparency, explainability.
Abstract
Purpose: This study explores the ethical issues that arise in building a community where humans can use smart technology to lead happier lives, a smart society. Method: Technology in a smart society is not unrelated to the human variable, no matter how advanced its level is. As humans pursue value, smart societies also need to be explored from an ethical perspective. This study provides the need for an ethical approach that emphasizes humanity in the process of building and maintaining a smart society. The research was conducted by contents based approach. Results: This research showed that the smart society was clarified by the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and got two characteristics as follows: First, AI, which is the core of smart society in particular, fosters human nature and potentialility through automatic self-realization, human representation, personal and social skills, and social cohesion. Second, smart AI ethical standards include beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice, and explicability. Conclusion: This paper presented a normative and substantial directions to what preparations should be made for human-centered ethical coexistence in a future-oriented smart society. The ethical virtue or a way of living could be summarized as followed: love for humans, retrospective understanding, variable dialogue, self-sustainability, tarnsparency, explainability.
참고문헌 (17)
- 서은숙, "The Super-Aged Multiculturalism in South Korea and the Necessity of Wearable AI Ethics", Robotics & AI Ethics, 5(2), pp.34~41 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Yeojin Lim, "Implications of Emotional Coaching and Integrated Art Therapy Teaching Method on Leadership Education in the AI Era", Robotics & AI Ethics, 5(2), pp.42~49 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- 이재범, "Suggestions for Using AI in Preparation for a Super-Aging Society", Robotics & AI Ethics, 5(2), pp.57~64 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Yi Li, "AI Ethics and Privacy Right", Robotics & AI Ethics, 5(2), pp.27~33 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Kim Tae-woong, "IR4.0 and Ethical Tasks of AI", Robotics & AI Ethics, 4(2), pp.6~13 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
- Floridi L, "AI 4 People -An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations-", Minds and Machines, 28, pp.689~707 (2018)
- Lee J, "Protection of Personal Information in Cyberspace", Information Society and Media, 12, pp.51~62 (2007)
- Levy C, "Towards a Smart Society", Big Innovation Centre, ~ (2014)
- Oosthuizen J, "The Determinants of Fourth Industrial Revolution Leasdership Dexterity: A Proposed Framework for 4IR-intelligence and Subsequent 4IR Leadership Development", 4th International Conference on Responsible Leadership (2017)
- Jeong J, "Study on Targets and Methods of Personal Information Risk in Smart Society", Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 16(3), pp.113~136 (2013)
- Future Possiblities Report 2020, "2020 Centennial Lab", Ministry of Cabinet Affairs and the Future, ~ (2020)
- Ashley KD, "Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics", pp.2017
- Joldersman CW, "Neuroscience and Education: A Philosophical Appraisal" (2016), Taylor & Francis
- Levy N, "Neuroethics", pp.2007