수중 출산에서 산모와 신생아의 성과; 일개 자연출산병원의 3년간 자료를 바탕으로
Outcomes of Maternal and Newborn in Waterbirth; A Review of 3-Year Medical Records in a Natural Birth Center
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the effects of waterbirth on the maternal delivery process and its safety on the newborn babies. Methods: This study is a retrospective study, analyzing the medical records of pregnant women who gave birth at a natural birthing center in Seoul, Republic of Korea. The study compared and analyzed a total of 1,907 medical records of pregnant women, composed of 539 women who used a birthing pool and 1,160 women who did not use a birthing pool from 2015 to 2017. The collected data were analyzed by the chisquare test, Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher exact test using SPSS ver. 22.0. The results are shown in the table below. Results: The cesarean section rate was lower in the birthing pool use group, compared to the non-birthing pool use group (p=0.038), with the significantly lower cesarean section rate in birthing pool use group among primigravida women in particular (p=0.002). The birthing pool use group also used oxytocin less frequently than the non-birthing pool use group (p=0.001) And especially in primigravida women, the second stage of delivery in birthing pool use group was found to be shorter than that of the non-birthing pool use group (p=0.045). There were no significant differences in the neonatal Apgar score and the neonatal intensive care unit admission rate between the 2 groups. Conclusion: This study has its meaning as the first report in Korea that analyzes the effects of waterbirth on the maternal delivery process and its safety on the newborn babies.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the effects of waterbirth on the maternal delivery process and its safety on the newborn babies. Methods: This study is a retrospective study, analyzing the medical records of pregnant women who gave birth at a natural birthing center in Seoul, Republic of Korea. The study compared and analyzed a total of 1,907 medical records of pregnant women, composed of 539 women who used a birthing pool and 1,160 women who did not use a birthing pool from 2015 to 2017. The collected data were analyzed by the chisquare test, Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher exact test using SPSS ver. 22.0. The results are shown in the table below. Results: The cesarean section rate was lower in the birthing pool use group, compared to the non-birthing pool use group (p=0.038), with the significantly lower cesarean section rate in birthing pool use group among primigravida women in particular (p=0.002). The birthing pool use group also used oxytocin less frequently than the non-birthing pool use group (p=0.001) And especially in primigravida women, the second stage of delivery in birthing pool use group was found to be shorter than that of the non-birthing pool use group (p=0.045). There were no significant differences in the neonatal Apgar score and the neonatal intensive care unit admission rate between the 2 groups. Conclusion: This study has its meaning as the first report in Korea that analyzes the effects of waterbirth on the maternal delivery process and its safety on the newborn babies.
참고문헌 (20)
- Bovbjerg ML, "Maternal and newborn outcomes following waterbirth : The Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009 Cohort", J Midwifery Womens Health, 61, pp.11~20 (2016)
- Burns EE, "Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool : a prospective observational study", Birth, 39, pp.192~202 (2012)
- Davies R, "The effect of waterbirth on neonatal mortality and morbidity : a systematic review and meta-analysis", JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep, 13, pp.180~231 (2015)
- Demirel G, "The effects of water birth on neonatal outcomes : a five-year result of a referral tertiary centre", Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 17, pp.1395~1398 (2013)
- Harper B., "Waterbirth basics: from newborn breathing to hospital protocols", Midwifery Today Int Midwife, (117), pp.32~35 (2016)
- Kavosi Z, "A comparison of mothers' quality of life after normal vaginal, cesarean, and water birth deliveries", Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery, 3, pp.198~204 (2015)
- 이은주, "조산원 출산 여성의 ‘자연출산’ 의미와 경험 - 페미니스트 접근", 여성건강간호학회지, 18(2), pp.135~148 (2012), 한국여성건강간호학회[DOI]
- Lee SH, "Characteristics, motivation of choice and childbirth experience of women who selected delivery at midwifery clinic", Korean Parent-Child Health J, 16, pp.1~10 (2013)
- Lim KM, "A comparative study between the pioneer cohort of waterbirths and conventional vaginal deliveries in an obstetrician-led unit in Singapore", Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 55, pp.363~367 (2016)
- Menakaya U, "A retrospective comparison of water birth and conventional vaginal birth among women deemed to be low risk in a secondary level hospital in Australia", Women Birth, 26, pp.114~118 (2013)
- Mollamahmutoğlu L, "The effects of immersion in water on labor, birth and newborn and comparison with epidural analgesia and conventional vaginal delivery", J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc, 13, pp.45~49 (2012)
- Nilvér H, "Measuring women's childbirth experiences : a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments", BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 17, pp.203~ (2017)
- Odent M, "Birth under water", Lancet, 2, pp.1476~1477 (1983)
- Park MI, "A clinic study on underwater 650 case", Korean J Obstet Gynecol, 87, pp.179~ (2001)
- Peacock PJ, "Neonatal outcomes following delivery in water: evaluation of safety in a district general hospital", Cureus, 10, pp.e2208~ (2018)
- Poder TG, "Advantages and disadvantages of water birth. A systematic review of the literature", Gynecol Obstet Fertil, 42, pp.706~713 (2014)
- Taylor H, "Neonatal outcomes of waterbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis", Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 101, pp.F357~F365 (2016)
- Thöni A, "Water birthing: retrospective review of 2625 water births. Contamination of birth pool water and risk of microbial cross-infection", Minerva Ginecol, 62, pp.203~211 (2010)
- Ulfsdottir H, "Waterbirth in Sweden-a comparative study", Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 97, pp.341~348 (2018)
- Weaver MH, "Water birth in the hospital setting", Nurs Womens Health, 18, pp.365~369 (2014)