유도분만 시행 여부에 따른 임산부의 분만진행과정, 분만결과, 분만만족도
Pregnant Women’s Labor Progress, Childbirth Outcome, and Childbirth Satisfaction according to the Presence or Absence of Labor Induction
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To provide accurate information on induced labor and find strategies to enhance women’s childbirth satisfaction. Methods: Participants were pregnant women expected to have normal vaginal delivery. A total of 113 women with induced labor and 61 women with spontaneous labor were surveyed. Data were collected using a questionnaire and electronic medical records. Results: The following variables related to labor progress showed significant differences between the induced labor group and the spontaneous labor group: length of the first stage of labor in primigravidas, use of analgesic, incidence of uterine hyperstimulation, incidence of fetal distress, and medical treatment for the expectant mother. Delivery type and the incidence of postpartum complications showed significant difference between the two groups. Induced labor women’s childbirth satisfaction was mainly affected by the process of labor whereas spontaneous labor women’s childbirth satisfaction was affected by the outcome of childbirth. Conclusion: Medical staff should have accurate information on the risk of induced labor and the benefits of a natural delivery. Moreover, medical staff should provide necessary information and environment for women to participate in the decision-making process.
Abstract
Purpose: To provide accurate information on induced labor and find strategies to enhance women’s childbirth satisfaction. Methods: Participants were pregnant women expected to have normal vaginal delivery. A total of 113 women with induced labor and 61 women with spontaneous labor were surveyed. Data were collected using a questionnaire and electronic medical records. Results: The following variables related to labor progress showed significant differences between the induced labor group and the spontaneous labor group: length of the first stage of labor in primigravidas, use of analgesic, incidence of uterine hyperstimulation, incidence of fetal distress, and medical treatment for the expectant mother. Delivery type and the incidence of postpartum complications showed significant difference between the two groups. Induced labor women’s childbirth satisfaction was mainly affected by the process of labor whereas spontaneous labor women’s childbirth satisfaction was affected by the outcome of childbirth. Conclusion: Medical staff should have accurate information on the risk of induced labor and the benefits of a natural delivery. Moreover, medical staff should provide necessary information and environment for women to participate in the decision-making process.
참고문헌 (29)
- Mozurkewich E, "Indications for induction of labour: a best-evidence review", An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 116(5), pp.626~636 (2009)[DOI]
- (2006)[URL]
- Rayburn WF, "Rising rates of labor induction: Present concerns and future strategies", Obstetrics & Gynecology, 100(1), pp.164~167 (2002)
- Eom JM, "Effect of labor induction on cesarean delivery rates in term pregnancies", pp.2011
- 최영실, "초임부에서 유도된 진통 분만의 임상적 고찰", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 50(12), pp.1650~1656 (2007), 대한산부인과학회
- Kelly AJ, "Vaginal prostaglandin (Prostaglandin E2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term", Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, 4 (2003)
- Lee BI, "A clinical study on the risk factors responsible for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in vaginal delivery", Inje Medical Journal, 12(1), pp.41~42 (1991)
- Kaufman KE, "Elective induction: An analysis of economic and health consequences", American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 187(4), pp.858~863 (2002)[DOI]
- Maslow AS, "Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low risk women at term", Obstetrics & Gynecology, 95(6), pp.917~922 (2000)
- Lee HS, "Clinical study on the oxytocin effect on neonate", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 29(7), pp.942~949 (1986)
- Choi H, "The management of post-term pregnancy: a comparative clinical study between the induced labor and the spontaneous labor", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 27(15), pp.2108~2114 (1984)
- Simpson KR, "Trends and issues in labor induction in the United States: Implications for clinical practice", Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 32(6), pp.767~779 (2003)[DOI]
- Smith GCS, "Cesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy", The Lancet, 362(9398), pp.1779~1784 (2003)[DOI]
- McCrea BH, "Satisfaction in childbirth and perception of personal control in pain relief during labor", Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(4), pp.877~884 (2000)[DOI]
- Hauck Y, "The influence of childbirth expectations on Western Australian women's perceptions of their birth experience", Midwifery, 23(3), pp.235~247 (2007)[DOI]
- Nichols FH, "Childbirth education: Practice, research and theory" (2000), W.B. Saunders
- Yeh P, "The relationship between umbilical cord arterial pH and serious adverse neonatal outcome: Analysis of 51519 consecutive validated samples", An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gyanecology, 119(7), pp.824~831 (2012)[DOI]
- Hodnett ED, "The Labour Agentry Scale: Psychometric properties of an instrument measuring control during childbirth", Research in Nursing and Health, 10(5), pp.301~310 (1987)[DOI]
- Fraser M, "Randomized controlled trial of a prenatal vaginal birth after cesarean section education and support program", American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 176(2), pp.419~425 (1997)[DOI]
- Kim DY, "Original article: A clinical study on the elective induction of labor", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 41(12), pp.2990~2996 (1998)
- Cammu H, "Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: A matched cohort study", American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186(2), pp.240~244 (2002)[DOI]
- van Gemund N, "Intervention rates after elective induction of labor compared to labor with a spontaneous onset", Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 56(3), pp.133~138 (2003)[DOI]
- Porreco RP, "The changing specter of uterine rupture", American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 200(3), pp.269.e1~269.e4 (2009)[DOI]
- Briggs GG, "Drug therapy during labor and delivery, part 2", American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 63(12), pp.1131~1139 (2006)[DOI]
- Nicholson JM, "Active management of risk in nulliparous pregnancy at term: Association between a higher preventive labor induction rate and improved birth outcomes", American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 200(3), pp.254.e1~254.e13 (2009)[DOI]
- Ashalatha S, "Women's perceptions, expectations and satisfaction with induced labour-A questionnaire-based study", European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 123(1), pp.56~61 (2005)[DOI]
- Chun N, "The effects of childbirth education on primiparas' childbirth experience and postpartum maternal adaptation", pp.2001
- Henderson J, "Women's experience of induction of labor: a mixed methods study", Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 92(10), pp.1159~1167 (2013)
- Jun HR, "Decisionmaking process and satisfaction of pregnant women for delivery method", Korean Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(4), pp.751~769 (1998)