본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어의 종성중화 작용이 영어 단어 인지에 미치는 영향

The Effects of Korean Coda-neutralization Process on Word Recognition in English

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This study addresses the issue of whether Korean(L1)-English(L2) non-proficient bilinguals are affected by the native coda-neutralization process when recognizing words in English continuous speech. Korean phonological rules require that if liaison occurs between 'words', then coda-neutralization process must come before the liaison process, which results in liaison-consonants being coda-neutralized ones such as /b/, /d/, or /g/, rather than non-neutralized ones like /p/, /t/, /k/, /ʧ/, /ʤ/,or /s/. Consequently, if Korean listeners apply their native coda-neutralization rules to English speech input, word detection will be easier when coda-neutralized consonants precede target words than when non-neutralized ones do. Word-spotting and word-monitoring tasks were used in Experiment 1 and 2, respectively. In both experiments, listeners detected words faster and more accurately when vowel-initial target words were preceded by coda-neutralized consonants than when preceded by coda non-neutralized ones. The results show that Korean listeners exploit their native phonological process when processing English,irrespective of whether the native process is appropriate or not.

Abstract

This study addresses the issue of whether Korean(L1)-English(L2) non-proficient bilinguals are affected by the native coda-neutralization process when recognizing words in English continuous speech. Korean phonological rules require that if liaison occurs between 'words', then coda-neutralization process must come before the liaison process, which results in liaison-consonants being coda-neutralized ones such as /b/, /d/, or /g/, rather than non-neutralized ones like /p/, /t/, /k/, /ʧ/, /ʤ/,or /s/. Consequently, if Korean listeners apply their native coda-neutralization rules to English speech input, word detection will be easier when coda-neutralized consonants precede target words than when non-neutralized ones do. Word-spotting and word-monitoring tasks were used in Experiment 1 and 2, respectively. In both experiments, listeners detected words faster and more accurately when vowel-initial target words were preceded by coda-neutralized consonants than when preceded by coda non-neutralized ones. The results show that Korean listeners exploit their native phonological process when processing English,irrespective of whether the native process is appropriate or not.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 허웅, "국어음운학" (1985), 샘문화사
  2. 김선미, "음절의 시작과 단어 시작의 불일치가 영어 단어 인지에 미치는 영향", 말소리와 음성과학, 1(4), pp.61~71 (2009), 한국음성학회
  3. 이호영, "국어음성학" (1996), 태학사
  4. 박현수, "한국어 모어 화자의 음절에 의한 말소리 분절", 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 16(3), pp.261~283 (2004), 한국인지및생물심리학회
  5. Bailey, C.-J. N., "Gradience in English syllabification and a revised concept of unmarked syllabification" (1978), Indiana University Linguistics Club
  6. The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM), "Baayen, R. H.", Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, ~ (1995)
  7. Cutler, A., "The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary", Computer Speech and Language, 2, pp.133~142 (1987)
  8. Cutler, A., "The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English", Journal of Memory and Language, 25, pp.385~400 (1986)
  9. Cutler, A., "Mora or phoneme? Further evidence for language-specific listening", Journal of Memory and Language, 33, pp.824~844 (1994)
  10. Darcy, I., "“Online processing of phonological variation in speech comprehension: The case of assimilation”, Temporal integration in the perception of speech", Temporal integration in the perception of speech, 32 (2002), ISCA
  11. Darcy, I., "Bilinguals play by the rules: Perceptual compensation for assimilation in late L2-learners", Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 9 (2007)
  12. Darcy, I., "“Phonological knowledge in compensation for native and non-native assimilation”, In Variation and Gradience in Phonetics and Phonology" (2007), Mouton de Gruyter
  13. Gaskell, G., "Phonological variation and inference in lexical access", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, pp.144~158 (1996)
  14. Gaskell, G., "Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, pp.380~396 (1998)
  15. Goto, H., "Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds 'l' and 'r'", Neuropsychologia, 9, pp.317~323 (1971)
  16. Hoard, J. E., "Aspiration, tenseness, and syllabification in English", Language, 47, pp.133~140 (1971)
  17. Ishikawa, K., "Syllabification of intervocalic consonants by English and Japanese Speakers", Language and Speech, 45(4), pp.355~385 (2002)
  18. Kahn, D., "Syllable-based generalization in English phonology" (1976), MIT Dissertation Service Center
  19. Kilborn, K., "Word spotting", Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(6), pp.689~694 (1996)
  20. McQueen, J. M., "Word spotting", Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(6), pp.695~699 (1996)
  21. McQueen, J. M., "Rhythmic cues and Possible-Word Constraints in Japanese speech segmentation", Journal of Memory and Language, 45, pp.103~132 (2001)
  22. Miyawaki, K., "An effect of linguistic experience; The discrimination of", r, l, pp.by native speakers of japanese and English, Perception and Psychophysics[DOI]
  23. Navarra, J., "The perception of second language sounds in early bilinguals: new evidence from an implicit measure", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), pp.912~918 (2005)
  24. Otake, T., "Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese", Journal of Memory and Language, 32, pp.258~278 (1993)
  25. Otake, T., "Speech segmentation by Japanese listeners", pp.183~201 (1996), Mouton de Gruyter
  26. Pallier, C., "A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception", Cognition, 64, pp.B9~B17 (1997)
  27. Pallier, C., "The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: Exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries", Psychological Science, 12(6), pp.445~449 (2001)
  28. Pulgram, E., "Syllable, word, nexus, cursus" (1970), Mouton
  29. Ranbom, L., "Lexical representation of phonological variation in spoken word recognition", Journal of Memory and Language, 57, pp.273~298 (2007)
  30. Sebastián-Gallés, N., "On-line processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals", Cognition, 72, pp.112~123 (1999)
  31. Selkirk, E. O., "The syllable. in: The structure of phonological representations (part 2)" (1982), Foris
  32. Snoeren, N. D., "On the role of regular phonological variation in lexical access: Evidence from voice assimilation in French", Cognition, 108, pp.512~521 (2008)
  33. Treiman, R., "Segmentation of spoken words into syllables by English-speaking children as compared to adults", Journal of Child Psychology, 83, pp.213~238 (2002)
  34. Treiman, R., "Syllabification of intervocalic consonants", Journal of Memory and Language, 27, pp.87~104 (1988)
  35. Treiman, R., "Toward an understanding of English syllabification", Memory and Language, 29(1), pp.66~85 (1990)
  36. Tyler, M. D., "Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(1), pp.367~376 (2009)
  37. Vroomen, J., "Lexical access of resyllabified words: Evidence from phoneme monitoring", Memory and Cognition, 27, pp.413~421 (1999)
  38. Vroomen, J., "Cues to segmentation", Evidence from juncture misperceptions and word spotting. Memory and Cognition, 24, pp.744~755 (1996)
  39. Warner, N., "Use of complex phonological patterns in speech processing: evidence from Korean", Journal of Linguistics, 41, pp.353~387 (2005)
  40. Weber, A., "First-language phonotactics in second-language listening", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, pp.597~607 (2006)
  41. Werker, JF, "Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, pp.1866~1878 (1984)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)