본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Analysis of Korean-to-English machine translation systems’ treatment of passives.

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study explores how Korean-to-English machine translation (MT) systems (e.g., Google Translator, NAVER Papago) deal with Korean passive structures. Cross-linguistically, Korean and English passives show different ways to construct passive-voice sentences from active structure. English passives including with be+p.p. may have a ‘by phrase’ after the verb, which perform the agent of the action. However, Korean has three different passive structures and a rich repertoire of affixes, including case markers, which play critical roles in the production and comprehension of passives, complicating translation to English. Moreover, the grammatical constructions that express passive voice in Korean and English differ in terms of frequency in both written and spoken contexts. To explore production accuracy by two MTs, 213 Korean passive sentences were translated into English passives. This finding shows that current Korean-to-English MTs almost always produce translations that are correct in meaning when they generally translate Korean passives into English passives. They also translate Korean passives into English active voice constructions at significant rates.

Abstract

This study explores how Korean-to-English machine translation (MT) systems (e.g., Google Translator, NAVER Papago) deal with Korean passive structures. Cross-linguistically, Korean and English passives show different ways to construct passive-voice sentences from active structure. English passives including with be+p.p. may have a ‘by phrase’ after the verb, which perform the agent of the action. However, Korean has three different passive structures and a rich repertoire of affixes, including case markers, which play critical roles in the production and comprehension of passives, complicating translation to English. Moreover, the grammatical constructions that express passive voice in Korean and English differ in terms of frequency in both written and spoken contexts. To explore production accuracy by two MTs, 213 Korean passive sentences were translated into English passives. This finding shows that current Korean-to-English MTs almost always produce translations that are correct in meaning when they generally translate Korean passives into English passives. They also translate Korean passives into English active voice constructions at significant rates.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Aarts, B., "English syntax and argumentation" (2017), Bloomsbury Academic
  2. Baker, M., "Phrase structure and the lexicon", pp.7~34 (1996), Springer
  3. Biber, D., "Longman grammar of spoken and written English" (1999), Longman
  4. 변혜원, "An Analysis on the Performance Differences in Translating the Passive Voice", 통번역교육연구, 15(3), pp.173~189 (2017), 한국통번역교육학회[DOI]
  5. EFL Teacher’s Course, "The grammar book: An ESL", pp.1999, Celce-Murcia, M.
  6. Cowan, R., "The teacher's grammar of English with answers: A course book and reference guide" (2008), Cambridge University Press
  7. Ferreira, V. S., "Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntax and lexical production", Cognitive Psychology, 40(4), pp.296~340 (2000)
  8. Hong, K. S., "Argument selection and case marking in Korean", doctor, pp.1992
  9. 김은일, "영어 수동문의 한국어 번역에 대한 기능문법적 설명", 언어과학, 18(1), pp.21~41 (2011), 한국언어과학회
  10. 김채은, "Korean EFL Learners’ Production of English Relative Clauses", 현대영어교육, 18(2), pp.71~85 (2017), 현대영어교육학회
  11. 김채은, "한영 기계번역에 나타나는 관계절 연구", 영어영문학21, 34(4), pp.279~305 (2021), 21세기영어영문학회[DOI]
  12. 김경숙, "한국어 속담의 영어 기계번역에 미치는 격조사의 영향—구글번역기를 중심으로—", 언어학, 26(3), pp.139~157 (2018), 대한언어학회[DOI]
  13. Klaiman, M. H., "Passive and voice", pp.25~83 (1988), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  14. 이승아, "영한 병렬 코퍼스에 나타난 영어 수동문의 한국어 번역", 영어영문학, 56(5), pp.871~906 (2010), 한국영어영문학회[DOI]
  15. MacDonald, M. C., "How language production shapes language form and comprehension", Frontiers in Psychology, 4, pp.226~ (2013)
  16. 박기성, "영어와 한국어의 수동구문과 어휘부에서의 행위성", 새한영어영문학, 47(3), pp.183~205 (2005), 새한영어영문학회
  17. 박준석, "Analysis of the Types of Translation Errors by the Google Translator", 영어영문학연구, 59(4), pp.279~299 (2017), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
  18. 서희정, "‘교육과 인공지능’을 주제로 국내 학술지에 게재된 연구물 분석(1985-2018) : 언어 네트워크 분석 적용", 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지, 9(11), pp.209~217 (2019), 사단법인 인문사회과학기술융합학회[DOI]
  19. Shibatani, M., "Passives and related constructions : A prototype analysis", Language, 61(4), pp.821~848 (1985)
  20. Sohn, H. M., "Korean" (2019), Routledge
  21. 최준수, "한국어 수동구문과 사동구문: 어휘적 도출", 생성문법연구, 28(1), pp.1~68 (2018), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  22. Quirk, R., "A grammar of contemporary English" (1972), Longman

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)