세네카의 안티오이디푸스: 세네카의 오이디푸스 와 소포클레스의 오이디푸스 왕 비교 연구
Seneca's anti-Oedipus: a comparative study of Seneca's Oedipus and Sophocles' Oedipus the King
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is intended to investigate the reception and transformation of the Sophoclean version of the Oedipus myth in Seneca's Oedipus. In this Roman tragedy Seneca not only condensed, extended, corrected, and interpreted the influential version of Oedipus' myth, but also introduced elements of Roman values. This alteration leads to the crystalisation of a Roman Oedipus, i.e. Anti-Oedipus. In comparison with Sophocles' Oedipus the King, Seneca's Oedipus highlights three different points: 1. Senecan Oedipus does not show disbelief in the oracle of Apollo, but manifests himself in his piety. From a Roman point of view, the decrees of the gods(fatum/fata) no longer result from the enigmatic and whimsical actions of the gods, but a cosmological and historical principle, which one must accept and follow. 2. Seneca's Oedipus is not a drama about the search for truth, but about recognizing ordained fate and overcoming it. Accordingly, the work consists of two corresponding and contrasting parts in which Oedipus, on the one hand, fears confronting ordained fate and can not recognize it, and on the other, wills himself to recognize it, thus fulfilling and overcoming it. 3. The father-son relationship plays an important role in the fulfillment and overcoming of fate. As the dead Laius predicted how Oedipus would act, and ordained, implicitly, what mission he should achieve, Oedipus blinds himself and goes in exile to recover the order of nature and save his fatherland from plague. In this way Seneca went to dissolve the tragic conception inherent in human action in Sophocles' drama. Seneca's Oedipus does not show concretisation of condicio humana arising from the limitation of human knowledge, nor dramatize Oedipus' heroism culminating not only in the process of coming to full recognition of the truth, but also in his endurance of enormous suffering. But Senecan Oedipus is an incarnation of Roman ideology manifested in the very action of sacrificing individual existence and humanity to save his fatherland from plague and recover the order of nature.
Abstract
This study is intended to investigate the reception and transformation of the Sophoclean version of the Oedipus myth in Seneca's Oedipus. In this Roman tragedy Seneca not only condensed, extended, corrected, and interpreted the influential version of Oedipus' myth, but also introduced elements of Roman values. This alteration leads to the crystalisation of a Roman Oedipus, i.e. Anti-Oedipus. In comparison with Sophocles' Oedipus the King, Seneca's Oedipus highlights three different points: 1. Senecan Oedipus does not show disbelief in the oracle of Apollo, but manifests himself in his piety. From a Roman point of view, the decrees of the gods(fatum/fata) no longer result from the enigmatic and whimsical actions of the gods, but a cosmological and historical principle, which one must accept and follow. 2. Seneca's Oedipus is not a drama about the search for truth, but about recognizing ordained fate and overcoming it. Accordingly, the work consists of two corresponding and contrasting parts in which Oedipus, on the one hand, fears confronting ordained fate and can not recognize it, and on the other, wills himself to recognize it, thus fulfilling and overcoming it. 3. The father-son relationship plays an important role in the fulfillment and overcoming of fate. As the dead Laius predicted how Oedipus would act, and ordained, implicitly, what mission he should achieve, Oedipus blinds himself and goes in exile to recover the order of nature and save his fatherland from plague. In this way Seneca went to dissolve the tragic conception inherent in human action in Sophocles' drama. Seneca's Oedipus does not show concretisation of condicio humana arising from the limitation of human knowledge, nor dramatize Oedipus' heroism culminating not only in the process of coming to full recognition of the truth, but also in his endurance of enormous suffering. But Senecan Oedipus is an incarnation of Roman ideology manifested in the very action of sacrificing individual existence and humanity to save his fatherland from plague and recover the order of nature.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김기영, "오이디푸스 신화의 수용과 변형 소포클레스의 오이디푸스 왕을 중심으로", 26, pp.151~188 (2007)
- "Seneca의 비극 희랍라틴문학연구 인문과학연구소", pp.179~213 (1992), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 아이네이스, "6권에 나타난 로마인의 가치관 서양고전학연구", pp.203~31 (1993)
- 정세웅, "메데아의 자기형성과 그 비극적 함의-Seneca의 메데아 연구" (2007)
- Buchner, "Griechentum und Romertum Bauvergleich des sophokleischen und enekaischen Oidipus", pp.66~82 (1965)
- Calder III, "Tragedian of Imperial Rome", pp.1~11 (1976)
- Dingel, "Seneca und die Dichtung" (1974), Universitat Verlag
- Fairclough, "The Art of Poetry" (1926)
- Fitch, John G., "Seneca Oedipus, Agamemnon, Thyestes" (2004), Cambridge[DOI]
- Halliwell, Stephen, "Aristotle Poetics" (1995), Cambridge[DOI]
- Horn, Chr, "Worterbuch der antiken Philosophie" (2002), Munchen: Verlag C. H. Beck
- Hornblower, S, "The Oxford Classical Dictionary" (1996), Oxford: Oxford UP
- Eckard, "Der Einflus Senecas auf das europaische Drama" (1978)
- Liddell, J.D, "A Greek-English Lexicon" (1996), Oxford: Oxford UP,
- 1972, , 376~401
- 1972, , 402~49
- Schindel, Ulrich, "Senecas Tragodien: Dissoziation des Dramenkorpers?" (2003), Gottingen: Wallstein
- Schopsdau, K., "Zur dramatischen Struktur von Senecas Oedipus", 113, pp.84~100 (1985)
- Seidensticker, B, "Peripeteia and Tragic Dialectic in Euripidean Tragedy", pp.377~396, Oxford: Oxford UP
- Erich, "Vergleichende Untersuchungen zum 'Konig Oedipus' des Seneca und Sophokles", pp.151~95 (1972), Serta philologica Aenipontana II
- Lucius Annaeus Seneca, "Kommentar mit Einleitung Text und bersetzung" (1994), Universitat Verlag
